Jonathon Bewley
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Rides around 80 times a season, almost all over hurdles and fences, winning on 8% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 0.87). Riding last-time-out winners the record reads 30% (33 rides). Rides mostly for George Bewley — 99% of rides in the window.
The record is strongest at Kelso (13.6%, n=44), clear of the rider's 8.2% baseline. Rides on last-time-out winners have been a positive signal at 30.3% (n=33, Fair A/E 1.68). George Bewley supplies 99% of the rides and matches the rider's average almost exactly (8.2%, A/E 0.87). The rider also reads well over 2m5f – 3m (11.9%, n=126). The record reads poorly on Heavy going — 2.5% over 40 rides, 5.7pts below the baseline. The standout partner of the record: Mah Mate Bob (IRE) — 7 wins from 34 rides together.
Riding patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 8.2% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 8.2% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. First rides are the first captured pairing of horse and rider; last-time-out winners are horses whose previous captured run was a win; claiming rides are runs where the rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Jumping record
completion over obstacles · same window as headerHorses ridden
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Small sampleBy month
strike by month, 5 seasonsRiding for
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2006→Sires of the horses ridden
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 1,110 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 1,110 archived rides, newest first. The full record runs from 3 August 2006 to 31 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
KTB’s figures
the forward record · since 5 Oct 2026KTB’s figures on this rider’s mounts since 20 Oct 2026: fastest on KTB Speed in 1 run (won 0) · to 20 Oct 2026.
Each pick was a KTB figure’s choice before the off — the published KTB Selection, the top-rated horse on KTB Rating, the fastest on KTB Speed — settled against the result the next morning and never worked out again; “did not run” is counted apart. GB and Irish races only. A record of weeks so far: read it as a count, not a verdict.
Quick answers
- What is Jonathon Bewley's strike rate?
- Jonathon Bewley has won 31 of 380 rides since 2022, a strike rate of 8.2% (as at 1 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Jonathon Bewley do best at?
- Kelso by strike rate: 6 wins from 44 rides (13.6%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most rides on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Which yard does Jonathon Bewley ride most for?
- George Bewley, with 376 rides since 2022 — 99% of the total. That pairing has won 31 (8.2%).
- Is Jonathon Bewley in form?
- Too few rides in the last 14 days to read — 8 rides, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
- What is Jonathon Bewley's Fair A/E?
- 0.87, from 380 rides with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.