Skip to content
Trainer profile

Frau Scarlet Moller

4 runners in the last 5 seasons
As at 3 Nov 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner yesterday 100% of runners on the flat
Last 5 seasons Lifetime (2025→)
from 1 Jan 2022
0–4
Wins / Runs
0%
Strike rate
n=4
1 (25%)
Placed
0.00
Fair A/E
n=4 · 0.00 incl. margin
−4.00
£1 level stake
n=4 at SP · −100.0%
£4,580
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
0%

Small sample — fewer than 30 runs in this window. Read the Ns before the percentages.

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 0% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
0%+0.0
n=3 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −3.00
New recruits · first run for the yard
0%+0.0
n=1 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −1.00
When favourite
0%
n=1 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −1.00
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
0%+0.0
n=2 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −2.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 0% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Good to Soft 1 0 0% −1.00
Good 1 0 0% −1.00
Soft 1 0 0% −1.00
Standard (AW) 1 0 0% −1.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Strasbourg (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00
Deauville (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00
Fontainebleau (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00
Longchamp (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 3 1 0 0% −1.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 1 0 0% 0.00 −1.00
2nd–3rd fav 1 0 0% 0.00 −1.00
4th–6th fav 1 0 0% 0.00 −1.00
7th+ in betting 1 0 0% 0.00 −1.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Verdansk (GB)from Gavin Hernon 4 0 1 2 Nov 26
The one horse sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

The one horse listed arrived from another yard in our archive.

It has no later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

Current form

significance-gated

Last 14 days

Small sample
0 from 1
Only 1 runners in the last 14 days — too few to read against the baseline (gate: n≥15). The card states the sample and stays neutral.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
RiderRWSR£1
Delphine Santiago 3 0 0% −3.00
Mme Mickaelle Michel 1 0 0% −1.00
Muted rows are under 30 rides.

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
No Nay Never (USA) 0% · 0–4
Progeny have won 12.1% of 6,358 runs since 2018 (708 horses). Weakest on Good to Soft going: 9.1% from 618. Weakest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 7.6% from 185.
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 3 Nov 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

all 4 archived runs · newest first

Every one of Frau Scarlet Moller's 4 archived runners, from 3 August 2025 to 2 November 2026, newest first — no winners among them.

Best finish: 3rd of 15 — Verdansk (GB), Longchamp (FR), 7 Jun 2026.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP
02 Nov 26 Fontainebleau (FR) Verdansk (GB)J: Delphine Santiago Prix Du Centre D'ecotourisme De FranchardClass 3 · 7f · Soft · 16 ran 6th 11/1
20 Sep 26 Strasbourg (FR) Verdansk (GB)J: Delphine Santiago Prix Du Pmu Au Soleil A Molsheim (Prix Du Donon)7.5f · Good To Soft · 11 ran 4th 11/4F
07 Jun 26 Longchamp (FR) Verdansk (GB)J: Delphine Santiago Prix de l'Ile Saint-Louis (Handicap) (Turf)7f · Good · 15 ran 3rd 10/1
03 Aug 25 Deauville (FR) Verdansk (GB)J: Mme Mickaelle Michel Prix de la Villa Persane (Handicap) (4yo+) (All-Weather Track) (Polytrack)7f · Standard · 15 ran 6th 11/1

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is Frau Scarlet Moller's strike rate?
Frau Scarlet Moller has won 0 of 4 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 0% (as at 3 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive. A small sample — fewer than 30 runners, so read the count before the percentage.
Is Frau Scarlet Moller in form?
Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 1 runner, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 3 November 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).