Skip to content
Jockey profile

Miss E Bushe

11 rides in the lifetime window · 4 individual horses
As at 28 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last ride Jun 2017 91% of rides on the flat
No rides in the last 5 seasons — showing the lifetime record, from 1 Jan 2008 — the aggregate floor: every horse in the window has a complete captured career behind it.
0–11
Wins / Runs
0%
Strike rate
n=11
3 (27%)
Placed
0.00
n=11 · 0.00 incl. margin
−11.00
£1 level stake
n=11 at SP · −100.0%
£2,620
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
0%

Small sample — fewer than 30 runs in this window. Read the Ns before the percentages.

Riding patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 0% baseline
First ride on the horse · first captured pairing
0%+0.0
n=4 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −4.00
Last-time-out winners · previous run was a win
0%+0.0
n=1 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −1.00
Fresh horses · 61+ days off
0%+0.0
n=1 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −1.00
When favourite
0%
n=1 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −1.00
Claiming rides · riding with a claim
0%+0.0
n=10 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −10.00
Big fields · 14+ runners
0%+0.0
n=1 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −1.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 0% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. First rides are the first captured pairing of horse and rider; last-time-out winners are horses whose previous captured run was a win; claiming rides are runs where the rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Race type

TypeRWSR£1
Flat 10 0 0% −10.00
Hurdle 1 0 0% −1.00

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Standard (AW) 8 0 0% −8.00
Good to Soft 1 0 0% −1.00
Good 1 0 0% −1.00
Soft 1 0 0% −1.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Wolverhampton (AW) 3 0 0% −3.00
Lingfield (AW) 2 0 0% −2.00
Southwell (AW) 2 0 0% −2.00
Stratford 1 0 0% −1.00
Chelmsford City (AW) 1 0 0% −1.00
Lingfield 1 0 0% −1.00
Newbury 1 0 0% −1.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 5 8 0 0% −8.00
Class 6 2 0 0% −2.00
Class 4 1 0 0% −1.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 1 0 0% 0.00 −1.00
2nd–3rd fav 1 0 0% 0.00 −1.00
4th–6th fav 6 0 0% 0.00 −6.00
7th+ in betting 3 0 0% 0.00 −3.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses ridden

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Noguchi (IRE) 8 0 2 26 Jun 17
Flexible Flyer (GB) 1 0 0 12 May 17
Commanche (GB) 1 0 0 16 Mar 17
Speed Check (IRE) 1 0 1 30 Oct 14
All 4 horses ridden in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.

Riding for

same window · biggest samples first
TrainerRWSR£1
Chris Dwyer 10 0 0% −10.00
Don Cantillon 1 0 0% −1.00
Muted rows are under 30 rides.

Sires of the horses ridden

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Pivotal (GB) 0% · 0–8
Progeny have won 13.6% of 12,788 runs since 2008 (1,019 horses). Weakest over 2m5f – 3m (all codes): 7.4% from 108.
Exceed and Excel (AUS) 0% · 0–1
Progeny have won 11.9% of 16,030 runs since 2008 (1,161 horses). Strongest on Firm going: 20.7% from 198. Weakest on Soft going: 7.9% from 1,194.
Kris Kin (USA) 0% · 0–1
Progeny have won 7% of 732 runs since 2008 (89 horses). Strongest over 2m5f – 3m (all codes): 12.8% from 141. Weakest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 3.7% from 219.
Sleeping Indian (GB) 0% · 0–1
Progeny have won 8.9% of 3,714 runs since 2008 (238 horses). Weakest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 0.9% from 108.
Top line: the rider's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 28 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

all 11 archived runs · newest first

Every one of Miss E Bushe's 11 archived rides, from 30 October 2014 to 26 June 2017, newest first — no winners among them.

Best finish: 2nd of 10 — Noguchi (IRE), Southwell (AW), 19 Jan 2017.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP
12 May 17 Lingfield Flexible Flyer (GB)T: Chris Dwyer Silk Series Lady Riders' HandicapClass 4 · 7f · Good To Soft · 7 ran 4th 9/1
29 Mar 17 Southwell (AW) Noguchi (IRE)T: Chris Dwyer Betway Amateur Riders' HandicapClass 6 · 14f · Standard · 10 ran 5th 10/1
27 Jan 17 Lingfield (AW) Noguchi (IRE)T: Chris Dwyer Betway Amateur Riders' HandicapClass 5 · 12f · Standard · 11 ran 10th 14/1
19 Jan 17 Southwell (AW) Noguchi (IRE)T: Chris Dwyer Betway Amateur Riders' HandicapClass 5 · 14f · Standard · 10 ran 2nd 10/1
29 Jan 16 Lingfield (AW) Noguchi (IRE)T: Chris Dwyer Coral Amateur Riders' HandicapClass 5 · 12f · Standard · 10 ran 3rd 20/1

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is Miss E Bushe's strike rate?
Miss E Bushe has won 0 of 11 rides since 2008, a strike rate of 0% (as at 28 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive. A small sample — fewer than 30 rides, so read the count before the percentage.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 28 October 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).