Skip to content
Jockey profile

Cedric Gueude

86 rides in the lifetime window · 68 individual horses
As at 28 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last ride Nov 2012 93% of rides on the flat
No rides in the last 5 seasons — showing the lifetime record, from 1 Jan 2008 — the aggregate floor: every horse in the window has a complete captured career behind it.
2–86
Wins / Runs
2.3%
Strike rate
n=86
8 (9%)
Placed
0.69
n=82 · 0.59 incl. margin
−64.90
£1 level stake
n=82 at SP · −79.1%
£47,157
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
0%
KTB at a glance Claiming: 3.4%

Riding patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 2.3% baseline
First ride on the horse · first captured pairing
1.5%−0.8
n=68 · A/E 0.44 · £1 −51.80
Last-time-out winners · previous run was a win
0%−2.3
n=5 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −4.00
Fresh horses · 61+ days off
0%−2.3
n=29 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −26.00
When favourite
50%
n=2 · A/E 2.29 · £1 +2.90
Claiming rides · riding with a claim
3.4%+1.1
n=58 · A/E 0.88 · £1 −39.90
Big fields · 14+ runners
1.8%−0.5
n=55 · A/E 0.58 · £1 −50.10

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 2.3% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. First rides are the first captured pairing of horse and rider; last-time-out winners are horses whose previous captured run was a win; claiming rides are runs where the rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
At Deauville (FR) 0% vs 2.3% · n=33
On Standard (AW) going 0% vs 2.3% · n=30
On first rides for the horse 1.5% vs 2.3% · n=68 · A/E 0.44
In Flat races 2.5% vs 2.3% · n=80 · A/E 0.71
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Race type

TypeRWSR£1
Flat 80 2 2.5% −59.90
Hurdle 5 0 0% −4.00
Chase 1 0 0% −1.00

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Standard (AW) 30 0 0% −30.00
Good 23 1 4.3% −8.80
Soft 18 0 0% −17.00
Good to Soft 9 1 11.1% −3.10
Heavy 6 0 0% −6.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Deauville (FR) 33 0 0% −33.00
Maisons-Laffitte (FR) 18 0 0% −17.00
Saint-Cloud (FR) 13 0 0% −12.00
Longchamp (FR) 10 0 0% −10.00
Chantilly (FR) 5 2 40% +12.10
Enghien (FR) 5 0 0% −5.00
Nancy 1 0 0% —
Vittel 1 0 0% —

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 2 1 50% 2.29 +2.90
2nd–3rd fav 4 0 0% 0.00 −4.00
4th–6th fav 7 1 14.3% 1.90 +5.20
7th+ in betting 69 0 0% 0.00 −69.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses ridden

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Our Prince (FR) 3 0 0 21 Nov 12
Le Chichi (FR) 3 0 0 11 Jan 11
Valika Dhelleville (FR) 2 0 0 2 Nov 12
William Jasper (FR) 2 0 0 7 Dec 11
Alter Konig (GER) 2 0 0 16 Sep 11
Mambo Star (FR) 2 0 0 30 Aug 11
Balmito (FR) 2 1 1 5 Aug 11
Kosovare (FR) 2 0 0 3 Jun 11
Premiere Aiguille (FR) 2 0 0 21 May 11
Glamour Profession (IRE) 2 0 2 11 Jan 11
Lady Meadow (FR) 2 0 0 27 Dec 10
Palmeral (IRE) 2 1 2 16 Jul 10
Showing the 60 most-raced of the 68 horses ridden in this window — each ran at least 1 time. Horses with fewer runs aren't listed; search finds any horse since 2005. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.

By month

strike by month, lifetime
JFMAMJJASOND
0·00004000000
A flat rider: the season runs Mar–Oct. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Riding for

same window · biggest samples first
TrainerRWSR£1
F Vermeulen 16 1 6.3% −10.10
B Dutruel 10 1 10% +2.20
C Aubert 6 0 0% −5.00
Mlle S-V Tarrou 5 0 0% −5.00
R Caget 4 0 0% −4.00
J Van Handenhove 3 0 0% −2.00
P Chevillard 3 0 0% −3.00
Mme M Bollack-Badel 3 0 0% −3.00
D Retif 3 0 0% −3.00
G Poznanski 2 0 0% −2.00
J-P Gauvin 2 0 0% −2.00
M Figge 2 0 0% −2.00
Muted rows are under 30 rides.

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2005→
3
Archived wins
£55,653
Prize money
2011
Best season · 1 win
In our archive from its very first year (2005), so this career almost certainly began earlier than our record does. The figures above count 2005 onwards only — what the archive holds, not a full-career total. This card is the full archive census (2005→); the statistics in the header aggregate from 2008 — the floor that guarantees every horse a complete captured career — so this card can legitimately show more wins than the header.
Balmito (FR) — Prix Des Blancs Sablons (Claimer) (3yo) (Turf) Chantilly (FR) · Jul 2011
£9,052
Palmeral (IRE) — Prix De La Butte Ronde (Handicap) (4yo) (Turf) Chantilly (FR) · Jul 2010
£7,522
Bedaly (FR) — Prix d'Herblay (Claimer) (Colts & Geldings) Saint-Cloud (FR) · Apr 2006
£6,552

Sires of the horses ridden

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Blackdoun (FR) 0% · 0–3
Progeny have won 6.6% of 242 runs since 2008 (39 horses).
Chichicastenango (FR) 0% · 0–3
Progeny have won 11.7% of 728 runs since 2008 (103 horses). Strongest on Soft going: 14.9% from 174. Weakest on Standard (AW) going: 7.8% from 219. Weakest over 6f – 7f (all codes): 7.1% from 112.
Prince Kirk (FR) 0% · 0–3
Progeny have won 6.1% of 246 runs since 2008 (43 horses).
Apsis (GB) 50% · 1–2
Progeny have won 8.3% of 785 runs since 2008 (91 horses). Strongest over 1m2f – 1m4f (all codes): 12.2% from 115. Weakest over 1m – 1m1f (all codes): 4.5% from 112.
Captain Rio (GB) 0% · 0–2
Progeny have won 9.5% of 6,912 runs since 2008 (423 horses).
Elusive City (USA) 0% · 0–2
Progeny have won 9.7% of 8,425 runs since 2008 (636 horses). Weakest on Soft going: 6.4% from 1,122.
Top line: the rider's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 28 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 89 · newest first

The latest 50 of 89 archived rides, newest first. The full record runs from 10 August 2005 to 21 November 2012.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is Cedric Gueude's strike rate?
Cedric Gueude has won 2 of 86 rides since 2008, a strike rate of 2.3% (as at 28 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does Cedric Gueude do best at?
Deauville (FR) by strike rate: 0 wins from 33 rides (0%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most rides on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
What is Cedric Gueude's Fair A/E?
0.69, from 82 rides with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 28 October 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).