Skip to content
Jockey profile

Elwis Lequesne

97 rides in the lifetime window · 52 individual horses
As at 6 Nov 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last ride Mar 2012 100% of rides over jumps
No rides in the last 5 seasons — showing the lifetime record, from 1 Jan 2008 — the aggregate floor: every horse in the window has a complete captured career behind it.
2–97
Wins / Runs
2.1%
Strike rate
n=97
11 (11%)
Placed
0.00
n=88 · 0.00 incl. margin
−90.00
£1 level stake
n=90 at SP · −100.0%
£235k
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
0%
KTB at a glance First rides: 3.8%

Riding patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 2.1% baseline
First ride on the horse · first captured pairing
3.8%+1.7
n=52 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −47.00
Last-time-out winners · previous run was a win
0%−2.1
n=5 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −4.00
Fresh horses · 61+ days off
0%−2.1
n=34 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −32.00
When favourite
0%
n=4 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −4.00
Big fields · 14+ runners
0%−2.1
n=53 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −53.00
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
0%−2.1
n=25 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −23.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 2.1% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. First rides are the first captured pairing of horse and rider; last-time-out winners are horses whose previous captured run was a win; claiming rides are runs where the rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
At Enghien (FR) 0% vs 2.1% · n=32
On Heavy going 0% vs 2.1% · n=32
On first rides for the horse 3.8% vs 2.1% · n=52 · A/E 0.00
In Hurdle races 1.4% vs 2.1% · n=72 · A/E 0.00
Over 2m1f – 2m4f 2.7% vs 2.1% · n=75 · A/E 0.00
On Soft going 1.6% vs 2.1% · n=63 · A/E 0.00
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Race type

TypeRWSR£1
Hurdle 72 1 1.4% −68.00
Chase 25 1 4% −22.00

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Soft 63 1 1.6% −58.00
Heavy 32 0 0% −31.00
Good to Soft 2 1 50% −1.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Auteuil (FR) 61 1 1.6% −56.00
Enghien (FR) 32 0 0% −32.00
Pau 1 0 0% −1.00
Nancy 1 0 0% —
Cagnes-Sur-Mer 1 1 100% —
Angers 1 0 0% −1.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 1 25 0 0% −23.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 4 0 0% 0.00 −4.00
2nd–3rd fav 4 0 0% 0.00 −4.00
4th–6th fav 14 0 0% 0.00 −14.00
7th+ in betting 68 0 0% 0.00 −68.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Jumping record

completion over obstacles · same window as header
55.7% completed · 97 obstacle rides (chases & hurdles)
CodeRCompFURPUBDOth
Chase 25 60% 5 0 4 0 1
Hurdle 72 54.2% 1 0 19 0 13
Chases and hurdles only — bumpers have no obstacles, so completion is not a question there. F fell · UR unseated rider · PU pulled up · BD brought down · Oth covers refusals, slip-ups, run-outs and the rare disqualification. Non-runners are excluded throughout. Rows under n=30 are shown faded. A descriptive record, not a tip.

Horses ridden

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Deus Ex Machina (FR) 8 1 1 18 Mar 12
Royal Surabaya (FR) 8 1 2 2 Dec 11
Gratia Plena (FR) 7 0 3 28 Feb 12
Secret Agent (FR) 5 0 0 24 Nov 10
Royal Penny (FR) 4 0 0 19 Sep 11
Masters Royal (FR) 4 0 0 6 Apr 11
Voix Royale (FR) 3 0 0 2 Dec 11
Sasharzy (FR) 3 0 0 13 Apr 11
Kasp Royal (FR) 3 0 0 17 Nov 10
Latino Lover (FR) 2 0 0 18 Mar 12
Spiv (FR) 2 0 0 10 Jun 11
Royal Maker (FR) 2 0 0 22 Apr 11
All 52 horses ridden in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.

By month

strike by month, lifetime
JFMAMJJASOND
006000··00025
A jumps rider: the season runs Oct–Apr. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Riding for

same window · biggest samples first
Main yardB Barbier
41% of all rides
2.5% SR · A/E 0.00
TrainerRWSR£1
B Barbier 40 1 2.5% −38.00
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2005→
4
Archived wins
£454k
Prize money
2010
Best season · 1 win
In our archive from its very first year (2005), so this career almost certainly began earlier than our record does. The figures above count 2005 onwards only — what the archive holds, not a full-career total. This card is the full archive census (2005→); the statistics in the header aggregate from 2008 — the floor that guarantees every horse a complete captured career — so this card can legitimately show more wins than the header.
Royal Surabaya (FR) — Prix De La Picardue (Handicap Hurdle) Cagnes-Sur-Mer · Dec 2010
£39,823
Coralhasi (FR) — Prix Francoise de Ganay (Handicap Hurdle) Auteuil (FR) · Dec 2007
£24,324
Deus Ex Machina (FR) — Prix Cousin Pons (Chase) Auteuil (FR) · Mar 2009
£23,301

Sires of the horses ridden

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Michel Georges (GB) 12.5% · 1–8
Progeny have won 12.4% of 266 runs since 2008 (30 horses).
Pelder (IRE) 12.5% · 1–8
Progeny have won 10.8% of 249 runs since 2008 (24 horses).
Kahyasi (IRE) 0% · 0–7
Progeny have won 10.7% of 2,120 runs since 2008 (185 horses).
Solid Illusion (USA) 0% · 0–7
Progeny have won 10.1% of 69 runs since 2008 (5 horses).
Kapgarde (FR) 0% · 0–5
Progeny have won 12.5% of 6,634 runs since 2008 (725 horses).
Cyborg (FR) 0% · 0–4
Progeny have won 8.9% of 470 runs since 2008 (45 horses). Weakest on Good going: 4.9% from 102.
Top line: the rider's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 6 Nov 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 126 · newest first

The latest 50 of 126 archived rides, newest first. The full record runs from 13 March 2005 to 18 March 2012.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP
26 Feb 12 Angers Pride Du Clos (FR)T: L Godard Prix DAuteuil (Chase)18.5f · Good To Soft · 3 ran 3rd 32/1

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is Elwis Lequesne's strike rate?
Elwis Lequesne has won 2 of 97 rides since 2008, a strike rate of 2.1% (as at 6 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does Elwis Lequesne do best at?
Auteuil (FR) by strike rate: 1 wins from 61 rides (1.6%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most rides on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
What is Elwis Lequesne's Fair A/E?
0.00, from 88 rides with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 6 November 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).