Skip to content
Jockey profile

Laurent Huart

89 rides in the lifetime window · 49 individual horses
As at 6 Nov 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last ride Mar 2011 100% of rides on the flat
No rides in the last 5 seasons — showing the lifetime record, from 1 Jan 2008 — the aggregate floor: every horse in the window has a complete captured career behind it.
4–89
Wins / Runs
4.5%
Strike rate
n=89
14 (16%)
Placed
0.53
n=75 · 0.44 incl. margin
−10.80
£1 level stake
n=76 at SP · −14.2%
£116k
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
0%
KTB at a glance M Nigge: 3.8% from 53 First rides: 6.3%

Riding patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 4.5% baseline
First ride on the horse · first captured pairing
6.3%+1.8
n=48 · A/E 1.31 · £1 +27.20
Last-time-out winners · previous run was a win
0%−4.5
n=4 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −3.00
Fresh horses · 61+ days off
0%−4.5
n=21 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −17.00
When favourite
0%
n=2 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −2.00
Big fields · 14+ runners
1.7%−2.8
n=59 · A/E 0.38 · £1 −34.80
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
0%−4.5
n=7 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −3.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 4.5% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. First rides are the first captured pairing of horse and rider; last-time-out winners are horses whose previous captured run was a win; claiming rides are runs where the rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
On Standard (AW) going 9.1% vs 4.5% · n=33
Over 1m2f – 1m4f 8.6% vs 4.5% · n=35
At Deauville (FR) 8.3% vs 4.5% · n=36
With M Nigge 3.8% vs 4.5% · n=53 · A/E 0.38
In Flat races 4.5% vs 4.5% · n=89 · A/E 0.53
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Standard (AW) 33 3 9.1% +36.20
Good 18 1 5.6% −16.00
Good to Soft 17 0 0% −16.00
Soft 17 0 0% −14.00
Heavy 4 0 0% −1.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Deauville (FR) 36 3 8.3% +31.20
Longchamp (FR) 14 0 0% −14.00
Saint-Cloud (FR) 14 0 0% −13.00
Maisons-Laffitte (FR) 8 0 0% −8.00
Chantilly (FR) 5 0 0% −4.00
Cholet 2 0 0% —
Saint-Malo 2 1 50% —
Nantes (FR) 2 0 0% —
Le Lion-D'Angers (FR) 2 0 0% −1.00
Cagnes-Sur-Mer (FR) 1 0 0% —
Amiens (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00
Durtal 1 0 0% −1.00
Segre (FR) 1 0 0% —

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 1 7 0 0% −3.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 2 0 0% 0.00 −2.00
2nd–3rd fav 9 0 0% 0.00 −9.00
4th–6th fav 13 0 0% 0.00 −13.00
7th+ in betting 52 2 3.8% 1.37 +13.20
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses ridden

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Eire (GB) 6 0 2 3 Jul 10
Licania (USA) 5 0 0 23 Sep 10
Un Certainmonsieur (FR) 5 0 1 10 Aug 10
Quirinus (GB) 5 1 1 14 Jul 10
Je Suis La (FR) 4 0 1 5 Aug 10
Very Best (FR) 3 0 0 17 Dec 10
Secundus (GER) 3 0 0 14 Sep 10
Loup Normand (FR) 3 0 1 9 Sep 10
Bon'Thorou (FR) 3 0 0 8 Sep 10
Aleandros (GER) 3 0 1 21 Aug 10
Battle Winner (FR) 3 0 0 8 Aug 10
Marangu (IRE) 3 0 0 6 Aug 10
All 49 horses ridden in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.

By month

strike by month, lifetime
JFMAMJJASOND
00000110150000
A flat rider: the season runs Mar–Oct. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Riding for

same window · biggest samples first
Main yardM Nigge
60% of all rides
3.8% SR · A/E 0.38
TrainerRWSR£1
M Nigge 53 2 3.8% −26.80
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2005→
5
Archived wins
£146k
Prize money
2010
Best season · 3 wins
In our archive from its very first year (2005), so this career almost certainly began earlier than our record does. The figures above count 2005 onwards only — what the archive holds, not a full-career total. This card is the full archive census (2005→); the statistics in the header aggregate from 2008 — the floor that guarantees every horse a complete captured career — so this card can legitimately show more wins than the header.
Sternenberg (GER) — Prix De Dieppe (Handicap) (4yo) (Fibresand) Deauville (FR) · Aug 2010
£10,619
Soleil De Vati (FR) — Prix De La Pegaserie (Claimer) (3yo) (Jockeys who have not ridden 10 winners this year) (Fibresand) Deauville (FR) · Aug 2010
£9,292
Quirinus (GB) — Prix De Combourg (Turf) Saint-Malo · Jun 2010
£6,637

Sires of the horses ridden

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Okawango (USA) 14.3% · 1–7
Progeny have won 9.4% of 936 runs since 2008 (80 horses). Strongest on Good to Soft going: 13.4% from 134.
Medicean (GB) 0% · 0–6
Progeny have won 10.4% of 9,890 runs since 2008 (682 horses).
Big Shuffle (USA) 0% · 0–5
Progeny have won 9.1% of 1,088 runs since 2008 (134 horses).
Fusaichi Pegasus (USA) 0% · 0–5
Progeny have won 8.4% of 681 runs since 2008 (61 horses). Weakest on Good going: 3.2% from 157. Strongest over 1m – 1m1f (all codes): 11.4% from 140.
Timboroa (GB) 0% · 0–5
Progeny have won 7.9% of 177 runs since 2008 (24 horses).
Panis (USA) 0% · 0–4
Progeny have won 8.4% of 1,980 runs since 2008 (211 horses). Strongest on Heavy going: 12.2% from 147. Weakest over 2m1f – 2m4f (all codes): 4.3% from 116.
Top line: the rider's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 6 Nov 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 102 · newest first

The latest 50 of 102 archived rides, newest first. The full record runs from 12 March 2005 to 11 March 2011.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP
31 Oct 10 Durtal Sokool (FR)T: G Henrot Prix de Mathefelon (Turf)10f · Good To Soft · 5 ran 5th 48/10

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is Laurent Huart's strike rate?
Laurent Huart has won 4 of 89 rides since 2008, a strike rate of 4.5% (as at 6 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does Laurent Huart do best at?
Deauville (FR) by strike rate: 3 wins from 36 rides (8.3%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most rides on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
Which yard does Laurent Huart ride most for?
M Nigge, with 53 rides since 2008 — 60% of the total. That pairing has won 2 (3.8%).
What is Laurent Huart's Fair A/E?
0.53, from 75 rides with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 6 November 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).