Skip to content
Trainer profile

B V Van Den Troost

19 runners in the last 5 seasons · 5 individual horses
As at 27 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner 111 days ago 100% of runners on the flat
from 1 Jan 2022
1–19
Wins / Runs
5.3%
Strike rate
n=19
5 (26%)
Placed
1.26
n=19 · 1.05 incl. margin
−13.20
£1 level stake
n=19 at SP · −69.5%
£18,322
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
0%

Small sample — fewer than 30 runs in this window. Read the Ns before the percentages.

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 5.3% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
0%−5.3
n=5 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −5.00
New recruits · first run for the yard
0%−5.3
n=2 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −2.00
Debutants · first career start
0%−5.3
n=1 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −1.00
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
0%−5.3
n=2 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −2.00
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
0%−5.3
n=4 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −4.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 5.3% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Standard (AW) 10 0 0% −10.00
Good to Soft 5 1 20% +0.80
Good 2 0 0% −2.00
Soft 2 0 0% −2.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Chantilly (FR) 8 0 0% −8.00
Deauville (FR) 5 0 0% −5.00
Longchamp (FR) 3 1 33.3% +2.80
Saint-Cloud (FR) 3 0 0% −3.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 3 1 0 0% −1.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
2nd–3rd fav 2 1 50% 4.22 +3.80
4th–6th fav 3 0 0% 0.00 −3.00
7th+ in betting 14 0 0% 0.00 −14.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Cleostorm (FR)from T Van Den Troost · then Yannick Luyckx 8 0 4 29 Nov 22
Cotubanama (GB)from T Van Den Troost 3 1 1 16 Jun 22
Rockin With Mr D (HOL) 1 0 0 2 Nov 22
All 5 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 5 horses listed, 4 arrived from another yard in our archive, most often from T Van Den Troost (3); 1 had its first archived run for this yard.

3 have since run for another yard; 2 have no later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
RiderRWSR£1
Benjamin Marie 6 1 16.7% −0.20
Pierre Bazire 3 0 0% −3.00
Stephane Breux 2 0 0% −2.00
Rosario Mangione 2 0 0% −2.00
C Demuro 1 0 0% −1.00
Esther Ruth Weissmeier 1 0 0% −1.00
Anna Van Den Troost 1 0 0% −1.00
Mme Mickaelle Michel 1 0 0% −1.00
Augustin Madamet 1 0 0% −1.00
Mme Sophie Tison 1 0 0% −1.00
Muted rows are under 30 rides.

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2021→
1
Archived wins
£29,965
Prize money
2022
Best season · 1 win
Cotubanama (GB) — Prix Marchant de Beaumont (Handicap) (4yo+) (New Course: 2nd Post) (Turf) Longchamp (FR) · Jun 2022
£6,723
Notable horses

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Stormy River (FR) 0% · 0–8
Progeny have won 9.2% of 2,225 runs since 2008 (253 horses).
Progeny have won 11.1% of 7,168 runs since 2008 (661 horses). Strongest at trips under 6f (all codes): 14.5% from 1,191.
Heeraat (IRE) 33.3% · 1–3
Progeny have won 8% of 2,996 runs since 2008 (194 horses).
Elusive City (USA) 0% · 0–2
Progeny have won 9.7% of 8,423 runs since 2008 (636 horses). Weakest on Soft going: 6.4% from 1,122.
Xi (USA) 0% · 0–1
Progeny have won 0% of 1 run since 2008 (1 horse). A small sample.
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 27 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

all 47 archived runs · newest first

Every one of B V Van Den Troost's 47 archived runners, from 7 May 2021 to 8 July 2026, newest first — one winner among them.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is B V Van Den Troost's strike rate?
B V Van Den Troost has won 1 of 19 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 5.3% (as at 27 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive. A small sample — fewer than 30 runners, so read the count before the percentage.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 27 October 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).