As at 22 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner Mar 2006100% of runners over jumps
Archive record 2005–2006
No runners from 1 Jan 2008, where our aggregate statistics normally begin — showing the full archive record instead, 11 Jan 2005 to 28 Mar 2006. Figures that need a horse's earlier runs (debuts, time since a run, first-time headgear, new connections, last-time-out winners) are left out: for runs this early our archive cannot see what came before.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Small sample — fewer than 30 runs in this window. Read the Ns before the percentages.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 7.1% baseline
When favourite
0%
n=1 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −1.00
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
6.3%−0.8
n=16 · A/E 1.10 · £1 −3.00
Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 7.1% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. Tiles that depend on a horse's earlier runs (debuts, time off, first-time headgear, new connections, last-time-out winners) are not shown on an archive-era record: for runs this early our archive cannot see what came before.
Record by conditions
same window as header
Race type
TypeRWSR£1
Chase18211.1%+1.00
Hurdle700%−7.00
NH Flat300%−3.00
Going
GoingRWSR£1
Soft1100%−11.00
Good to Soft6116.7%+0.00
Heavy6116.7%+7.00
Good400%−4.00
Good to Firm100%−1.00
Courses
CourseRWSR£1
Sedgefield8112.5%+5.00
Newcastle700%−7.00
Kelso6116.7%+0.00
Carlisle200%−2.00
Musselburgh200%−2.00
Hexham200%−2.00
Wetherby100%−1.00
Class
ClassRWSR£1
Class 419210.5%+0.00
Class 5400%−4.00
Class 6300%−3.00
Class 3200%−2.00
Market position
In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite100%0.00−1.00
2nd–3rd fav3133.3%2.68+3.00
4th–6th fav400%0.00−4.00
7th+ in betting2015%1.70−7.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.
Distance
DistanceRWSR£1
2m5f – 3m1100%−11.00
Over 3m8225%+11.00
1m5f – 2m600%−6.00
2m1f – 2m4f300%−3.00
By season
By seasonRWSR£1
200514214.3%+5.00
20061400%−14.00
Handicaps
HandicapsRWSR£1
Handicaps19210.5%+0.00
Field size
Field sizeRWSR£1
11-13 runners800%−8.00
8-10 runners8112.5%+5.00
14-16 runners500%−5.00
5-7 runners5120%+1.00
17+ runners200%−2.00
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Chases and hurdles only — bumpers have no obstacles, so completion is not a question there. F fell · UR unseated rider · PU pulled up · BD brought down · Oth covers refusals, slip-ups, run-outs and the rare disqualification. Non-runners are excluded throughout. Rows under n=30 are shown faded. A descriptive record, not a tip.
All 8 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next
Of the 8 horses listed, 3 have since run for another yard; 5 have no later run for another yard in our archive.
Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. Where a horse came from is not stated on an archive-era record: our archive cannot see before 2005. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.
In our archive from its very first year (2005), so this career almost certainly began earlier than our record does. The figures above count 2005 onwards only — what the archive holds, not a full-career total. On this page the header statistics and this card both count from the archive floor (2005), so they agree.
Progeny have won 10% of 40 runs since 2005 (3 horses).
Sir Harry Lewis (USA)0% · 0–4
Progeny have won 11.9% of 2,983 runs since 2005 (224 horses). Strongest on Heavy going: 16.2% from 334.
Video Rock (FR)0% · 0–4
Progeny have won 13.6% of 1,182 runs since 2005 (118 horses).
Primitive Rising (USA)0% · 0–3
Progeny have won 9.9% of 846 runs since 2005 (99 horses). Strongest on Good to Firm going: 14% from 143. Weakest on Good to Soft going: 6.4% from 171.
Bigstone (IRE)0% · 0–2
Progeny have won 9.2% of 621 runs since 2005 (44 horses). Strongest on Good to Firm going: 14.8% from 149.
Brier Creek (USA)0% · 0–1
Progeny have won 14.1% of 644 runs since 2005 (44 horses). Weakest on Heavy going: 9.5% from 105.
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2005, as at 22 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.
The record
all 28 archived runs · newest first
Every one of S B Bell's 28 archived runners, from 11 January 2005 to 28 March 2006, newest first — 2 winners among them.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
What is S B Bell's strike rate?
S B Bell has won 2 of 28 runners between 2005 and 2006, a strike rate of 7.1% (as at 22 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive. A small sample — fewer than 30 runners, so read the count before the percentage. Our archive begins in 2005, so anything earlier is not counted.
S B Bell·SR 7.1%·A/E 1.38
KTB
Cookies on Kickthebookies
We use essential cookies to run the site and remember your betslip. No advertising or tracking cookies, ever. By continuing to use this site, you agree. Cookie policy