Skip to content
Jockey profile

Glen Braem

137 rides in the lifetime window · 87 individual horses
As at 6 Nov 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last ride Jan 2020 100% of rides on the flat
No rides in the last 5 seasons — showing the lifetime record, from 1 Jan 2008 — the aggregate floor: every horse in the window has a complete captured career behind it.
4–137
Wins / Runs
2.9%
Strike rate
n=137
17 (12%)
Placed
0.57
n=136 · 0.61 incl. margin
−88.30
£1 level stake
n=137 at SP · −64.5%
£84,626
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
0%
KTB Rider Profile

Rode around 10 times a season, almost all on the flat, winning on 3% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 0.57).

Deterministic profile computed from 137 archived runs (lifetime window) · updated 6 Nov 2026
KTB at a glance First rides: 3.4%

Riding patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 2.9% baseline
First ride on the horse · first captured pairing
3.4%+0.5
n=87 · A/E 0.62 · £1 −44.90
Last-time-out winners · previous run was a win
0%−2.9
n=7 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −7.00
Fresh horses · 61+ days off
1.9%−1.0
n=54 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −49.80
When favourite
50%
n=2 · A/E 0.00 · £1 +2.20
Big fields · 14+ runners
4%+1.1
n=75 · A/E 1.27 · £1 −30.50
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
0%−2.9
n=1 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −1.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 2.9% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. First rides are the first captured pairing of horse and rider; last-time-out winners are horses whose previous captured run was a win; claiming rides are runs where the rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
Over 1m – 1m1f 6.5% vs 2.9% · n=46
With new recruits 6.7% vs 2.9% · n=30
Off a 15-30-day break 6.3% vs 2.9% · n=32
At Chantilly (FR) 1.9% vs 2.9% · n=52 · A/E 0.52
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Standard (AW) 89 3 3.4% −44.50
Good 21 0 0% −21.00
Soft 15 1 6.7% −10.80
Heavy 7 0 0% −7.00
Good to Soft 5 0 0% −5.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Chantilly (FR) 52 1 1.9% −36.80
Deauville (FR) 45 2 4.4% −15.70
Saint-Cloud (FR) 16 0 0% −16.00
Maisons-Laffitte (FR) 13 0 0% −13.00
Longchamp (FR) 8 0 0% −8.00
Royan La Palmyre 1 1 100% +3.20
Clairefontaine (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00
Compiegne (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 1 1 0 0% −1.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 2 1 50% 0.00 +2.20
2nd–3rd fav 9 1 11.1% 0.92 −2.40
4th–6th fav 21 0 0% 0.00 −21.00
7th+ in betting 105 2 1.9% 0.85 −67.10
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses ridden

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Full Court Press (IRE) 4 0 2 16 May 19
Jaliska (FR) 4 0 0 8 Apr 19
Acrux (GB) 4 1 1 1 Mar 19
Khareer (IRE) 4 0 0 30 Nov 16
Titus Mills (IRE) 4 1 1 2 May 16
Inkerman (IRE) 4 0 0 4 Feb 16
Its You Again (GB) 4 0 1 28 Jun 14
Run Ashore (FR) 3 0 1 2 Dec 19
Janaya (FR) 3 0 0 13 Apr 19
Two Weeks (GB) 3 0 0 12 Mar 19
Forbidden City (FR) 3 1 1 15 Feb 19
Happy Cause (USA) 3 0 0 12 Feb 19
Showing the 60 most-raced of the 87 horses ridden in this window — each ran at least 1 time. Horses with fewer runs aren't listed; search finds any horse since 2005. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.

By month

strike by month, lifetime
JFMAMJJASOND
70000001400010
A flat rider: the season runs Mar–Oct. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Riding for

same window · biggest samples first
Main yardLeo Braem
33% of all rides
2.2% SR · A/E 0.00
TrainerRWSR£1
Leo Braem 45 1 2.2% −40.80
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2006→
4
Archived wins
£84,626
Prize money
2018
Best season · 2 wins
This card is the full archive census (2005→); the statistics in the header aggregate from 2008 — the floor that guarantees every horse a complete captured career — so this card can legitimately show more wins than the header.
El Manifico (FR) — Prix de Mirande (Maiden) (3yo) (All-Weather Track) (Polytrack) Deauville (FR) · Dec 2018
£10,619
Forbidden City (FR) — Prix Watermael-Boitsfort (Handicap) (3yo) (All-Weather Track) (Polytrack) Chantilly (FR) · Dec 2018
£10,177
Acrux (GB) — Prix de Beaufosse (Claimer) (5yo+) (All-Weather Track) (Polytrack) Deauville (FR) · Jan 2019
£8,108

Sires of the horses ridden

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Elusive City (USA) 0% · 0–10
Progeny have won 9.7% of 8,429 runs since 2008 (636 horses). Weakest on Soft going: 6.4% from 1,123.
Avonbridge (GB) 0% · 0–6
Progeny have won 8.6% of 3,930 runs since 2009 (262 horses). Strongest at trips under 6f (all codes): 11.6% from 795.
Le Havre (IRE) 0% · 0–5
Progeny have won 12.4% of 5,883 runs since 2013 (750 horses). Strongest on Good to Firm going: 15.5% from 296.
Acclamation (GB) 0% · 0–4
Progeny have won 10% of 19,711 runs since 2008 (1,327 horses). Strongest on Firm going: 15.2% from 151. Weakest over 2m1f – 2m4f (all codes): 6.7% from 195.
Dansili (GB) 25% · 1–4
Progeny have won 13.7% of 11,842 runs since 2008 (983 horses). Strongest on Firm going: 16.8% from 101. Weakest on Heavy going: 7.9% from 428. Weakest over 2m5f – 3m (all codes): 9.1% from 209.
Dubawi (IRE) 25% · 1–4
Progeny have won 18.4% of 12,981 runs since 2009 (1,530 horses). Weakest at trips under 6f (all codes): 9.8% from 429.
Top line: the rider's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 6 Nov 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 138 · newest first

The latest 50 of 138 archived rides, newest first. The full record runs from 22 June 2006 to 11 January 2020.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is Glen Braem's strike rate?
Glen Braem has won 4 of 137 rides since 2008, a strike rate of 2.9% (as at 6 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does Glen Braem do best at?
Deauville (FR) by strike rate: 2 wins from 45 rides (4.4%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most rides on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
What is Glen Braem's Fair A/E?
0.57, from 136 rides with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 6 November 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).