Skip to content
Jockey profile

Sirhan Bigot

64 rides in the lifetime window · 44 individual horses
As at 6 Nov 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last ride May 2019
No rides in the last 5 seasons — showing the lifetime record, from 1 Jan 2008 — the aggregate floor: every horse in the window has a complete captured career behind it.
3–64
Wins / Runs
4.7%
Strike rate
n=64
7 (11%)
Placed
1.09
n=64 · 0.91 incl. margin
−51.30
£1 level stake
n=64 at SP · −80.2%
£82,168
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
0%

Riding patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 4.7% baseline
First ride on the horse · first captured pairing
4.5%−0.2
n=44 · A/E 1.23 · £1 −34.40
Last-time-out winners · previous run was a win
0%−4.7
n=2 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −2.00
Fresh horses · 61+ days off
0%−4.7
n=21 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −21.00
When favourite
50%
n=2 · A/E 2.29 · £1 +1.10
Claiming rides · riding with a claim
3.6%−1.1
n=56 · A/E 0.89 · £1 −50.30
Big fields · 14+ runners
5.3%+0.6
n=19 · A/E 1.10 · £1 −15.90
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
0%−4.7
n=1 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −1.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 4.7% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. First rides are the first captured pairing of horse and rider; last-time-out winners are horses whose previous captured run was a win; claiming rides are runs where the rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
On Soft going 7.9% vs 4.7% · n=38
In Hurdle races 7% vs 4.7% · n=43
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Race type

TypeRWSR£1
Hurdle 43 3 7% −30.30
Flat 12 0 0% −12.00
Chase 9 0 0% −9.00

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Soft 38 3 7.9% −25.30
Heavy 17 0 0% −17.00
Standard (AW) 7 0 0% −7.00
Good to Soft 1 0 0% −1.00
Good 1 0 0% −1.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Auteuil (FR) 31 1 3.2% −27.90
Enghien (FR) 15 1 6.7% −8.00
Compiegne (FR) 8 1 12.5% −5.40
Chantilly (FR) 4 0 0% −4.00
Deauville (FR) 3 0 0% −3.00
Saint-Cloud (FR) 2 0 0% −2.00
Maisons-Laffitte (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 1 1 0 0% −1.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 2 1 50% 2.29 +1.10
2nd–3rd fav 3 1 33.3% 1.58 −0.40
4th–6th fav 11 1 9.1% 1.16 −4.00
7th+ in betting 48 0 0% 0.00 −48.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Jumping record

completion over obstacles · same window as header
57.7% completed · 52 obstacle rides (chases & hurdles)
CodeRCompFURPUBDOth
Chase 9 44.4% 3 0 2 0 0
Hurdle 43 60.5% 5 0 12 0 0
Chases and hurdles only — bumpers have no obstacles, so completion is not a question there. F fell · UR unseated rider · PU pulled up · BD brought down · Oth covers refusals, slip-ups, run-outs and the rare disqualification. Non-runners are excluded throughout. Rows under n=30 are shown faded. A descriptive record, not a tip.

Horses ridden

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Kami Kaze II (FR) 4 1 3 19 Sep 17
Sandy Cay (FR) 4 1 1 6 Nov 16
Bonfou D'Airy (FR) 3 0 1 30 Nov 17
Tengara (FR) 3 0 0 6 Mar 17
Callista Nera (FR) 3 0 0 23 Nov 15
Tribalion (FR) 2 0 0 24 Nov 17
La Fougasse (FR) 2 0 0 27 Sep 17
Bad And Beautiful (FR) 2 0 0 5 Jun 17
Livingstone Devaig (FR) 2 0 0 5 Mar 17
Jem Arthur (FR) 2 0 1 8 Apr 16
Unique Du Moulin (FR) 2 0 0 30 Mar 16
La Baie Du Havre (FR) 2 0 0 6 Jun 15
All 44 horses ridden in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.

By month

strike by month, lifetime
JFMAMJJASOND
··1102200·0000
A jumps rider: the season runs Oct–Apr. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Riding for

same window · biggest samples first
TrainerRWSR£1
P Lenogue 27 1 3.7% −20.00
G-C Rudolf 7 1 14.3% −3.90
F Vermeulen 5 0 0% −5.00
F-M Cottin 3 0 0% −3.00
C Aubert 3 1 33.3% −0.40
Mme P Butel & J-L Beaunez 3 0 0% −3.00
R Kleparski 3 0 0% −3.00
C Boutin 3 0 0% −3.00
Y Gourraud 2 0 0% −2.00
A Klimscha Jr 2 0 0% −2.00
B Duchemin 1 0 0% −1.00
A Junk 1 0 0% −1.00
Muted rows are under 30 rides.

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2013→
3
Archived wins
£82,168
Prize money
2017
Best season · 2 wins
Kami Kaze II (FR) — Prix Tanerko (Hurdle) (Handicap) (5yo+) (Turf) Auteuil (FR) · May 2017
£22,564
Kheopps (FR) — Prix Burgrave II (Hurdle) (Claimer) (3yo Fillies) (Turf) Compiegne (FR) · May 2017
£10,256
Sandy Cay (FR) — Prix du Morbihan (Hurdle) (Claimer) (5yo+) (Turf) Enghien (FR) · Mar 2016
£8,118

Sires of the horses ridden

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Hernando (FR) 25% · 1–4
Progeny have won 12.1% of 3,531 runs since 2008 (273 horses). Weakest over 6f – 7f (all codes): 7.5% from 120.
Martaline (GB) 25% · 1–4
Progeny have won 14.2% of 7,347 runs since 2008 (723 horses). Weakest on Standard (AW) going: 9.4% from 128. Weakest over 1m – 1m1f (all codes): 10% from 120.
Anzillero (GER) 0% · 0–3
Progeny have won 12.7% of 551 runs since 2009 (75 horses). Weakest on Soft going: 9.7% from 267. Weakest over 2m5f – 3m (all codes): 8.3% from 120.
Balko (FR) 0% · 0–3
Progeny have won 12.7% of 2,661 runs since 2011 (297 horses).
Laveron (GB) 0% · 0–3
Progeny have won 10.2% of 1,171 runs since 2008 (142 horses). Strongest on Good to Soft going: 14.9% from 161. Weakest on Soft going: 6.9% from 477.
Le Havre (IRE) 0% · 0–3
Progeny have won 12.4% of 5,883 runs since 2013 (750 horses). Strongest on Good to Firm going: 15.5% from 296.
Top line: the rider's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 6 Nov 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 64 · newest first

The latest 50 of 64 archived rides, newest first. The full record runs from 7 March 2013 to 6 May 2019.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is Sirhan Bigot's strike rate?
Sirhan Bigot has won 3 of 64 rides since 2008, a strike rate of 4.7% (as at 6 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does Sirhan Bigot do best at?
Auteuil (FR) by strike rate: 1 wins from 31 rides (3.2%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most rides on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
What is Sirhan Bigot's Fair A/E?
1.09, from 64 rides with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 6 November 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).