M Seror
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 330 runners a season, winning with 10% of them — level with the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 0.99). The yard is quiet just now — 2 winners in the last fortnight, below its own baseline.
Debutants struggle at 6.4% (n=234, Fair A/E 0.80). A horse in first-time headgear are the standout value angle: 10.8% strikes only just above baseline, but Fair A/E 1.18 and +23.50 to a £1 stake over 176 runners — a record the market has persistently underpriced. The market has consistently overbet in Group and Graded company the record: 6.5% strike, Fair A/E 0.75 and −161.10 to a £1 stake over 430 runners — those runners underperform what the price implies. Right now the yard is in a quiet spell: 2 from 38 runners in the last 14 days (5.3%, 4.5pts below the 9.8% baseline). Kevin Nabet rides 12% of the entries and edges the yard's average (12.3% vs 9.8%, A/E 1.08) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The yard also reads well on Good to Soft going (17.3%, n=81). The record reads poorly on Heavy going — 6.2% over 615 runners, 3.6pts below the baseline. 40 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Prix du President de la Republique Handicap) at Auteuil (FR) (Apr 2026, £91,957). The stable star of the record: Le Roi David (FR) — 6 wins from 37 runs for the yard.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 9.8% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 9.8% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Jumping record
completion over obstacles · same window as headerHorses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Quiet spellWhen the yard fires
strike by month, 5 seasonsJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2010→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 2,995 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 2,995 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 9 May 2010 to 19 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is M Seror's strike rate?
- M Seror has won 162 of 1,649 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 9.8% (as at 20 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does M Seror do best at?
- Saint-Cloud (FR) by strike rate: 8 wins from 69 runners (11.6%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for M Seror?
- Kevin Nabet, with 195 runners since 2022 — 12% of the total. That pairing has won 24 (12.3%).
- Is M Seror in form?
- In the last 14 days: 38 runners, 2 winners, a strike rate of 5.3%. That is below the baseline of 9.8% since 2022.
- What is M Seror's Fair A/E?
- 0.99, from 1,643 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.