Skip to content
Jockey profile

James Martin

97 rides in the last 5 seasons · 21 individual horses
As at 15 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last ride Dec 2024 100% of rides over jumps
from 1 Jan 2022
10–97
Wins / Runs
10.3%
Strike rate
n=97
25 (26%)
Placed
1.08
Fair A/E
n=97 · 0.94 incl. margin
−38.26
£1 level stake
n=97 at SP · −39.4%
£106k
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
10.2%
KTB at a glance Andrew J Martin: 12.8% from 78 Claiming: 10.9%

Riding patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 10.3% baseline
First ride on the horse · first captured pairing
0%−10.3
n=18 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −18.00
Last-time-out winners · previous run was a win
9.1%−1.2
n=11 · A/E 0.61 · £1 −5.50
Fresh horses · 61+ days off
15.8%+5.5
n=19 · A/E 1.57 · £1 +2.41
When favourite
22.2%
n=9 · A/E 0.73 · £1 −4.21
Claiming rides · riding with a claim
10.9%+0.6
n=92 · A/E 1.13 · £1 −33.26
Big fields · 14+ runners
14.3%+4.0
n=7 · A/E 1.43 · £1 −2.80
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
0%−10.3
n=2 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −2.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 10.3% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. First rides are the first captured pairing of horse and rider; last-time-out winners are horses whose previous captured run was a win; claiming rides are runs where the rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
Over 1m5f – 2m 19.6% vs 10.3% · n=46
Over 2m1f – 2m4f 2.7% vs 10.3% · n=37
Off a 15-30-day break 4.5% vs 10.3% · n=44
On Good going 14.3% vs 10.3% · n=49
With Andrew J Martin 12.8% vs 10.3% · n=78
In Class 4 7.7% vs 10.3% · n=52
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Race type

TypeRWSR£1
Hurdle 78 7 9% −34.14
Chase 14 3 21.4% +0.88
NH Flat 5 0 0% −5.00

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Good 49 7 14.3% −19.76
Good to Soft 24 2 8.3% +0.00
Soft 19 0 0% −19.00
Heavy 5 1 20% +0.50

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Chepstow 11 2 18.2% −1.75
Uttoxeter 11 1 9.1% −4.50
Worcester 9 1 11.1% −7.09
Warwick 7 0 0% −7.00
Plumpton 6 1 16.7% −1.80
Exeter 5 0 0% −5.00
Ffos Las 5 1 20% +10.00
Stratford 5 1 20% +0.50
Newbury 4 1 25% +5.00
Huntingdon 4 1 25% −1.12
Taunton 4 0 0% −4.00
Wincanton 3 0 0% −3.00
Southwell 3 0 0% −3.00
Fakenham 3 1 33.3% +1.50
Bangor-on-Dee 3 0 0% −3.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 4 52 4 7.7% −36.96
Class 5 24 4 16.7% +5.20
Class 3 17 2 11.8% −2.50
Class 1 2 0 0% −2.00
Class 2 2 0 0% −2.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 10 2 20% 0.68 −5.21
2nd–3rd fav 22 6 27.3% 1.52 +7.95
4th–6th fav 28 2 7.1% 1.17 −4.00
7th+ in betting 37 0 0% 0.00 −37.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Jumping record

completion over obstacles · same window as header
87% completed · 92 obstacle rides (chases & hurdles)
CodeRCompFURPUBDOth
Chase 14 92.9% 0 0 1 0 0
Hurdle 78 85.9% 2 1 8 0 0
Chases and hurdles only — bumpers have no obstacles, so completion is not a question there. F fell · UR unseated rider · PU pulled up · BD brought down · Oth covers refusals, slip-ups, run-outs and the rare disqualification. Non-runners are excluded throughout. Rows under n=30 are shown faded. A descriptive record, not a tip.

Horses ridden

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Midnight Ginger (GB) 21 3 9 8 Nov 24
Charlie's Glance (GB) 14 3 6 26 Jul 24
Come On Nia (GB) 9 2 3 25 Nov 24
Glance At Me (GB) 9 2 5 18 Jun 24
Finest View (GB) 7 0 0 4 Aug 23
Darcy's Glance (GB) 6 0 0 30 May 24
Lucky Stripe (GB) 5 0 1 8 Oct 24
Calagogo (IRE) 4 0 0 11 Sep 24
Cassowary (IRE) 4 0 0 14 May 23
A Good Yomp (GB) 3 0 0 18 Dec 24
Jack The Savage (GB) 2 0 0 12 Nov 24
Fenna's Loss (IRE) 2 0 0 7 Sep 24
All 21 horses ridden in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.

By month

strike by month, 5 seasons
JFMAMJJASOND
101103314817000010
A jumps rider: the season runs Oct–Apr. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Riding for

same window · biggest samples first
80% of all rides
12.8% SR · A/E 1.15
TrainerRWSR£1
Andrew J Martin 78 10 12.8% −19.26
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2012→
24
Archived wins
£236k
Prize money
2024
Best season · 5 wins
Militarian (GB) — inthepaddock.co.uk Handicap Chase Ascot · Nov 2019 · Class 3
£16,505
Militarian (GB) — Sky Sports Racing Launching January 1st Handicap Chase Fakenham · Dec 2018 · Class 3
£10,007
Militarian (GB) — Fernie Chase (Novices' Limited Handicap) Leicester · Feb 2019 · Class 3
£7,408

Sires of the horses ridden

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Passing Glance (GB) 13.2% · 5–38
Progeny have won 12.4% of 3,522 runs since 2008 (288 horses). Strongest on Heavy going: 15.8% from 221. Weakest on Standard (AW) going: 7.3% from 289. Strongest beyond 3m (all codes): 15.5% from 110. Weakest over 6f – 7f (all codes): 8.8% from 171.
Midnight Legend (GB) 13% · 3–23
Progeny have won 14.2% of 8,308 runs since 2008 (494 horses).
Telescope (IRE) 22.2% · 2–9
Progeny have won 8.4% of 1,887 runs since 2008 (295 horses). Weakest on Standard (AW) going: 1.9% from 104. Strongest over 2m5f – 3m (all codes): 13.3% from 278.
Yorgunnabelucky (USA) 0% · 0–5
Progeny have won 11.2% of 1,075 runs since 2008 (97 horses). Strongest over 2m1f – 2m4f (all codes): 14.2% from 254.
Australia (GB) 0% · 0–4
Progeny have won 11.2% of 5,618 runs since 2008 (563 horses). Weakest over 2m5f – 3m (all codes): 6.7% from 105.
Doyen (IRE) 0% · 0–4
Progeny have won 11.6% of 7,339 runs since 2008 (605 horses).
Top line: the rider's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 15 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 321 · newest first

The latest 50 of 321 archived rides, newest first. The full record runs from 25 February 2012 to 18 December 2024.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is James Martin's strike rate?
James Martin has won 10 of 97 rides since 2022, a strike rate of 10.3% (as at 15 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which yard does James Martin ride most for?
Andrew J Martin, with 78 rides since 2022 — 80% of the total. That pairing has won 10 (12.8%).
What is James Martin's Fair A/E?
1.08, from 97 rides with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 15 October 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).