Skip to content
Jockey profile

Kevin Herzog

60 rides in the lifetime window · 44 individual horses
As at 6 Nov 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last ride Jun 2020 97% of rides over jumps
No rides in the last 5 seasons — showing the lifetime record, from 1 Jan 2008 — the aggregate floor: every horse in the window has a complete captured career behind it.
5–60
Wins / Runs
8.3%
Strike rate
n=60
9 (15%)
Placed
1.21
n=45 · 1.10 incl. margin
−2.00
£1 level stake
n=53 at SP · −3.8%
£166k
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
14.3%
KTB at a glance First rides: 11.4%

Riding patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 8.3% baseline
First ride on the horse · first captured pairing
11.4%+3.1
n=44 · A/E 1.63 · £1 +14.00
Last-time-out winners · previous run was a win
0%−8.3
n=3 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −3.00
Fresh horses · 61+ days off
8.7%+0.4
n=23 · A/E 2.44 · £1 +2.00
When favourite
0%
n=1 · A/E — · £1 −1.00
Claiming rides · riding with a claim
8.3%+0.0
n=12 · A/E 1.49 · £1 −6.70
Big fields · 14+ runners
8.3%+0.0
n=12 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −11.00
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
8.3%+0.0
n=12 · A/E 2.74 · £1 −3.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 8.3% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. First rides are the first captured pairing of horse and rider; last-time-out winners are horses whose previous captured run was a win; claiming rides are runs where the rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
On Soft going 12.9% vs 8.3% · n=31
On first rides for the horse 11.4% vs 8.3% · n=44
Over 2m1f – 2m4f 7.3% vs 8.3% · n=55 · A/E 1.29
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Race type

TypeRWSR£1
Hurdle 50 4 8% +0.70
Chase 8 1 12.5% −2.70
Flat 2 0 0% —

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Soft 31 4 12.9% +20.00
Heavy 15 0 0% −15.00
Good to Soft 8 1 12.5% −5.00
Good 6 0 0% −2.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Auteuil (FR) 25 1 4% −16.00
Compiegne (FR) 11 2 18.2% +10.00
Lyon Parilly 10 0 0% −8.00
Strasbourg 3 1 33.3% −2.00
Enghien (FR) 3 0 0% −3.00
Dieppe 1 1 100% +20.00
Avignon 1 0 0% —
Nancy 1 0 0% −1.00
Saint-Galmier 1 0 0% —
Aix-Les-Bains 1 0 0% −1.00
Gramat 1 0 0% —
Vichy (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00
Vittel (FR) 1 0 0% —

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 1 12 1 8.3% −3.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 1 0 0% — −1.00
2nd–3rd fav 6 1 16.7% 1.25 −0.70
4th–6th fav 18 1 5.6% 1.05 −9.00
7th+ in betting 28 2 7.1% 1.38 +8.70
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Jumping record

completion over obstacles · same window as header
79.3% completed · 58 obstacle rides (chases & hurdles)
CodeRCompFURPUBDOth
Chase 8 75% 1 0 1 0 0
Hurdle 50 80% 3 0 7 0 0
Chases and hurdles only — bumpers have no obstacles, so completion is not a question there. F fell · UR unseated rider · PU pulled up · BD brought down · Oth covers refusals, slip-ups, run-outs and the rare disqualification. Non-runners are excluded throughout. Rows under n=30 are shown faded. A descriptive record, not a tip.

Horses ridden

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
World Amiral (FR) 4 0 1 14 May 19
Colonel D'Aumont (FR) 4 0 0 24 Oct 17
Chateaudemalmaison (USA) 4 0 1 20 May 17
Ayrton Banks (FR) 2 0 0 24 Feb 20
Resplendor (FR) 2 1 1 1 Jun 19
Quaker (FR) 2 0 0 24 Nov 17
Peace Of Burg (FR) 2 1 1 24 Nov 17
Carla De Touzaine (FR) 2 0 0 22 Oct 16
Unroi De Touzaine (FR) 2 0 0 23 Sep 14
Billy Hill (FR) 2 0 0 12 Sep 14
Evron Danahill (FR) 1 0 0 21 Jun 20
Fiancee Du Large (FR) 1 0 0 8 Jun 20
All 44 horses ridden in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.

By month

strike by month, lifetime
JFMAMJJASOND
·0002711·00020·
A jumps rider: the season runs Oct–Apr. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Riding for

same window · biggest samples first
TrainerRWSR£1
S Culin 17 2 11.8% −2.70
S Eveno 6 0 0% −6.00
M Pimbonnet 5 0 0% −3.00
J-P Gallorini 4 0 0% −4.00
B Goudot 3 0 0% −3.00
Laura Lemiere 3 1 33.3% +18.00
Mathieu Pitart 3 0 0% −3.00
M Cesandri 3 0 0% −3.00
Mme J Laurent-Joye 2 1 50% +13.70
P Chatelain 2 0 0% −2.00
T Trapenard 1 0 0% —
Mlle S Sourd 1 0 0% −1.00
Muted rows are under 30 rides.

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2011→
5
Archived wins
1
Pattern / graded wins
£166k
Prize money
2017
Best season · 3 wins
Malaya (FR) — Prix d'Iena (Hurdle) () (3yo Fillies) (Turf) Auteuil (FR) · May 2017 · Listed
£34,872
Peace Of Burg (FR) — Prix Bucheur (Hurdle) (Conditions) (4yo) (Turf) Compiegne (FR) · Nov 2017
£26,667
Candy Burg (FR) — Prix Collins (Chase) (Conditions) (4yo) (Turf) Compiegne (FR) · May 2017
£21,333

Sires of the horses ridden

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Sageburg (IRE) 40% · 2–5
Progeny have won 10% of 3,488 runs since 2012 (416 horses). Strongest on Heavy going: 13.4% from 389. Weakest on Standard (AW) going: 2.7% from 295. Strongest over 2m5f – 3m (all codes): 13.2% from 355.
Muhtathir (GB) 0% · 0–4
Progeny have won 11.3% of 4,719 runs since 2008 (494 horses). Weakest on Standard (AW) going: 7.9% from 967.
Nickname (FR) 0% · 0–4
Progeny have won 16.6% of 857 runs since 2012 (95 horses). Strongest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 21.2% from 104.
War Front (USA) 0% · 0–4
Progeny have won 15.7% of 2,499 runs since 2010 (297 horses). Strongest on Standard (AW) going: 18.8% from 925. Weakest on Good going: 10.9% from 533. Strongest over 6f – 7f (all codes): 19.3% from 1,010.
Kapgarde (FR) 0% · 0–3
Progeny have won 12.5% of 6,634 runs since 2008 (725 horses).
Orpen (USA) 33.3% · 1–3
Progeny have won 9% of 4,038 runs since 2008 (381 horses). Weakest over 2m5f – 3m (all codes): 4.4% from 113.
Top line: the rider's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 6 Nov 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 60 · newest first

The latest 50 of 60 archived rides, newest first. The full record runs from 3 April 2011 to 21 June 2020.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is Kevin Herzog's strike rate?
Kevin Herzog has won 5 of 60 rides since 2008, a strike rate of 8.3% (as at 6 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
What is Kevin Herzog's Fair A/E?
1.21, from 45 rides with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 6 November 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).