Skip to content
Trainer profile

E Lacaille

39 runners in the last 5 seasons · 17 individual horses
As at 21 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner 10 days ago 97% of runners on the flat
from 1 Jan 2022
5–39
Wins / Runs
12.8%
Strike rate
n=39
10 (26%)
Placed
1.60
n=39 · 1.24 incl. margin
−15.25
£1 level stake
n=39 at SP · −39.1%
£43,608
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
10.8%

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 12.8% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
50%+37.2
n=4 · A/E 2.88 · £1 +5.50
New recruits · first run for the yard
25%+12.2
n=8 · A/E 2.21 · £1 +1.50
Debutants · first career start
10%−2.8
n=10 · A/E 1.88 · £1 −7.00
First-time headgear · true-first definition
14.3%+1.5
n=7 · A/E 2.16 · £1 −4.00
When favourite
75%
n=4 · A/E 2.89 · £1 +4.25

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 12.8% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Race type

TypeRWSR£1
Flat 38 5 13.2% −14.25
Hurdle 1 0 0% −1.00

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Soft 19 0 0% −19.00
Standard (AW) 12 2 16.7% +3.50
Good 4 2 50% +2.00
Good to Soft 2 1 50% +0.25
Heavy 2 0 0% −2.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Deauville (FR) 10 2 20% −4.00
Vichy (FR) 10 0 0% −10.00
Salon-de-Provence (FR) 7 0 0% −7.00
Lyon-La Soie (FR) 3 1 33.3% +6.00
Chantilly (FR) 3 1 33.3% +3.50
Lyon Parilly (FR) 2 0 0% −2.00
Marseille Borely (FR) 1 1 100% +1.25
Strasbourg (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00
Moulins (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00
Saint-Cloud (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 3 10 2 20% −4.00
Class 4 6 1 16.7% −3.75

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 4 3 75% 2.89 +4.25
2nd–3rd fav 7 1 14.3% 0.96 −0.50
4th–6th fav 7 1 14.3% 2.80 +2.00
7th+ in betting 21 0 0% 0.00 −21.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Anaheim (FR) 3 1 1 11 Oct 26
Niagaro (GER)from F Bresson 3 0 0 2 Oct 26
Sweet Sumerly (FR) 3 0 0 14 Sep 26
Purple Dahlia (FR) 2 0 0 11 Oct 26
Atavamada (FR) 2 0 1 25 Sep 26
Tiki Dreams (FR)from Alicja Karkosa 2 0 0 25 Sep 26
Alta Gracias (FR) 2 0 0 3 Sep 26
Le Minot (FR) 2 0 0 19 Aug 26
Pierre Le Grand 2 1 2 6 Aug 26
Kapetanios 2 0 0 6 Aug 26
All 17 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 17 horses listed, 7 arrived from another yard in our archive, most often from Mme Manon Scandella-Lacaille (2); 10 had their first archived run for this yard.

None of them has a later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

Current form

significance-gated

Last 14 days

Small sample
1 from 2
Only 2 runners in the last 14 days — too few to read against the baseline (gate: n≥15). The card states the sample and stays neutral.

When the yard fires

strike by month, 5 seasons
JFMAMJJASOND
····50·330820··
A flat yard: the season runs Mar–Oct. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
RiderRWSR£1
M Guyon 8 3 37.5% +4.50
Hugo Besnier 6 1 16.7% +3.00
Mme Marina Brunelli 4 0 0% −4.00
K Gaudeffroy 3 0 0% −3.00
Ioritz Mendizabal 3 0 0% −3.00
Mme Manon Germain 2 0 0% −2.00
P C Boudot 2 0 0% −2.00
Mme Marie Velon 2 0 0% −2.00
Theo Bachelot 1 0 0% −1.00
Anthony Girel 1 0 0% −1.00
Leonard Plommee 1 0 0% −1.00
Antonio Orani 1 0 0% −1.00
Muted rows are under 30 rides.

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2025→
5
Archived wins
£43,608
Prize money
2026
Best season · 4 wins
Pierre Le Grand (GB) — Prix de Borest (Handicap) (4yo+) (All-Weather Track) (Polytrack) Chantilly (FR) · May 2025
£8,264
Anaheim (FR) — Prix Yakoba Lyon-La Soie (FR) · Oct 2026
£8,151
Kapetanios (FR) — Prix Hotel Barriere Le Royal Deauville Marseille Borely (FR) · Sep 2026 · Class 4
£6,400

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Anodin (IRE) 28.6% · 2–7
Progeny have won 8.8% of 2,408 runs since 2008 (274 horses). Weakest over 2m1f – 2m4f (all codes): 3.4% from 116.
Kheleyf (USA) 16.7% · 1–6
Progeny have won 8.7% of 10,542 runs since 2008 (676 horses). Strongest on Firm going: 12.2% from 131. Weakest over 1m2f – 1m4f (all codes): 5.6% from 880.
Adlerflug (GER) 0% · 0–3
Progeny have won 14.3% of 580 runs since 2008 (108 horses). Strongest on Soft going: 18.3% from 169. Weakest on Standard (AW) going: 10.8% from 102.
Romanised (IRE) 0% · 0–3
Progeny have won 8.7% of 608 runs since 2008 (112 horses). Strongest on Standard (AW) going: 12.7% from 204. Weakest on Soft going: 4.4% from 137.
Slade Power (IRE) 0% · 0–3
Progeny have won 9.5% of 2,938 runs since 2008 (208 horses). Weakest on Heavy going: 6.4% from 125.
Zelzal (FR) 33.3% · 1–3
Progeny have won 9.5% of 1,671 runs since 2008 (240 horses).
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 21 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

all 39 archived runs · newest first

Every one of E Lacaille's 39 archived runners, from 2 May 2025 to 11 October 2026, newest first — 5 winners among them.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP
04 Oct 26 Strasbourg (FR) Libeccio (FR)J: Thomas Beaurain Prix Mid DancerClass 4 · 18f · Heavy · 9 ran 3rd 2/1
02 Oct 26 Lyon-La Soie (FR) Niagaro (GER)J: K Gaudeffroy Prix De VilleurbanneClass 4 · 12f · Standard · 9 ran 5th 12/1
08 Sep 26 Lyon Parilly (FR) Kapetanios (FR)J: Mme Marina Brunelli Prix Du RhoneClass 4 · 10f · Soft · 11 ran 9th 12/1

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is E Lacaille's strike rate?
E Lacaille has won 5 of 39 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 12.8% (as at 21 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Is E Lacaille in form?
Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 2 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
What is E Lacaille's Fair A/E?
1.60, from 39 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 21 October 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).