Ioritz Mendizabal
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Rides around 280 times a season, almost all on the flat, winning on 6% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 0.88). In Group and Graded company the record reads 8% (231 runs). The rider is quiet just now — 1 winner in the last fortnight, below their own baseline.
The market has consistently overbet rides in big fields of 14 or more: 3.5% strike, Fair A/E 0.68 and −287.60 to a £1 stake over 592 rides — those runners underperform what the price implies. Right now the rider is in a quiet spell: 1 from 30 rides in the last 14 days (3.3%, 3pts below the 6.3% baseline). F Chappet supplies 8% of the rides and beats the rider's average (11.6% vs 6.3%, A/E 1.41) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The record reads poorly off a 8-14-day break — 1.5% over 68 rides, 4.8pts below the baseline. The market has consistently overbet the rider off a break of 180+ days: Fair A/E 0.46 across 126 rides (3.2% strike, −59.00 to a £1 stake) — runners there underperform what the price implies. 164 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the rider has landed: the Qatar Prix du Jockey Club at Chantilly (FR) (Jun 2021, £765,268). The standout partner of the record: Taareef (USA) — 5 wins from 7 rides together. Seasonally, the rider fires Apr–May.
Riding patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 6.3% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 6.3% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. First rides are the first captured pairing of horse and rider; last-time-out winners are horses whose previous captured run was a win; claiming rides are runs where the rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses ridden
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Quiet spellBy month
strike by month, 5 seasonsRiding for
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→Sires of the horses ridden
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 7,082 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 7,082 archived rides, newest first. The full record runs from 10 March 2005 to 7 November 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is Ioritz Mendizabal's strike rate?
- Ioritz Mendizabal has won 88 of 1,390 rides since 2022, a strike rate of 6.3% (as at 8 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Ioritz Mendizabal do best at?
- Toulouse (FR) by strike rate: 4 wins from 51 rides (7.8%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most rides on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Which yard does Ioritz Mendizabal ride most for?
- F Chappet, with 112 rides since 2022 — 8% of the total. That pairing has won 13 (11.6%).
- Is Ioritz Mendizabal in form?
- In the last 14 days: 30 rides, 1 winner, a strike rate of 3.3%. That is below the baseline of 6.3% since 2022.
- What is Ioritz Mendizabal's Fair A/E?
- 0.88, from 1,388 rides with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.