As at 22 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner May 2005100% of runners on the flat
Archive record 2005
No runners from 1 Jan 2008, where our aggregate statistics normally begin — showing the full archive record instead, 2 Jan 2005 to 27 May 2005. Figures that need a horse's earlier runs (debuts, time since a run, first-time headgear, new connections, last-time-out winners) are left out: for runs this early our archive cannot see what came before.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
KTB at a glanceClaiming riders: 7%
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 6.3% baseline
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
7%+0.7
n=57 · A/E 1.31 · £1 +5.00
Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 6.3% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. Tiles that depend on a horse's earlier runs (debuts, time off, first-time headgear, new connections, last-time-out winners) are not shown on an archive-era record: for runs this early our archive cannot see what came before.
Notable angles
vs their own baseline
At Wolverhampton (AW)11.1% vs 6.3% · n=36
In Class 73% vs 6.3% · n=33
In Class 68.8% vs 6.3% · n=34
With claiming riders up7% vs 6.3% · n=57 · A/E 1.31
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.
Record by conditions
same window as header
Going
GoingRWSR£1
Standard (AW)6146.6%+1.00
Good to Firm900%−9.00
Good to Soft400%−4.00
Good200%−2.00
Soft2150%+32.00
Firm100%−1.00
Heavy100%−1.00
Courses
CourseRWSR£1
Wolverhampton (AW)36411.1%+26.00
Southwell (AW)2200%−22.00
Musselburgh500%−5.00
Lingfield (AW)300%−3.00
Catterick300%−3.00
Haydock3133.3%+31.00
Beverley200%−2.00
Chester200%−2.00
Ripon100%−1.00
Thirsk100%−1.00
Warwick100%−1.00
Doncaster100%−1.00
Class
ClassRWSR£1
Class 63438.8%+17.00
Class 73313%−22.00
Class 5800%−8.00
Class 2200%−2.00
Class 42150%+32.00
Class 3100%−1.00
Market position
In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
2nd–3rd fav600%0.00−6.00
4th–6th fav2229.1%1.18−3.00
7th+ in betting5235.8%1.93+25.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.
Distance
DistanceRWSR£1
Under 6f4324.7%−9.00
6f – 7f26311.5%+36.00
1m – 1m1f900%−9.00
1m5f – 2m200%−2.00
Handicaps
HandicapsRWSR£1
Handicaps20210%+31.00
Field size
Field sizeRWSR£1
11-13 runners4249.5%+28.00
8-10 runners2114.8%+5.00
5-7 runners800%−8.00
14-16 runners700%−7.00
17+ runners100%−1.00
2-4 runners100%−1.00
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
All 25 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next
Of the 25 horses listed, 15 have since run for another yard, most often for Peter Grayson (14); 10 have no later run for another yard in our archive.
Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. Where a horse came from is not stated on an archive-era record: our archive cannot see before 2005. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.
When the yard fires
strike by month, 2005
JFMAMJJASOND
130076·······
A flat yard: the season runs Mar–Oct. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".
Career highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→
5
Archived wins
£22,148
Prize money
2005
Best season · 5 wins
In our archive from its very first year (2005), so this career almost certainly began earlier than our record does. The figures above count 2005 onwards only — what the archive holds, not a full-career total. On this page the header statistics and this card both count from the archive floor (2005), so they agree.
Progeny have won 6.8% of 575 runs since 2005 (46 horses). Strongest on Standard (AW) going: 10% from 250.
Ashkalani (IRE)11.1% · 1–9
Progeny have won 7.4% of 1,122 runs since 2005 (115 horses). Strongest on Standard (AW) going: 10.7% from 290.
Petong (GB)12.5% · 1–8
Progeny have won 4.8% of 313 runs since 2005 (27 horses). Strongest on Standard (AW) going: 8.3% from 108.
Indian Lodge (IRE)20% · 1–5
Progeny have won 8.2% of 929 runs since 2005 (73 horses). Strongest on Good to Firm going: 12.8% from 219. Weakest on Soft going: 4.2% from 118. Strongest over 6f – 7f (all codes): 11.4% from 289. Weakest over 1m2f – 1m4f (all codes): 4.5% from 156.
Rossini (USA)0% · 0–5
Progeny have won 7.5% of 2,190 runs since 2005 (137 horses). Strongest on Good to Soft going: 12.4% from 226. Weakest on Heavy going: 1.9% from 104. Strongest at trips under 6f (all codes): 10.7% from 289.
Atraf (GB)0% · 0–4
Progeny have won 8.5% of 2,518 runs since 2005 (139 horses). Strongest at trips under 6f (all codes): 11.6% from 249. Weakest over 1m – 1m1f (all codes): 4.7% from 297.
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2005, as at 22 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.
The record
latest 50 of 80 · newest first
The latest 50 of 80 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 2 January 2005 to 27 May 2005.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
What is R P Elliott's strike rate?
R P Elliott has won 5 of 80 runners in 2005, a strike rate of 6.3% (as at 22 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive. Our archive begins in 2005, so anything earlier is not counted.
Which course does R P Elliott do best at?
Wolverhampton (AW) by strike rate: 4 wins from 36 runners (11.1%) in 2005. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
What is R P Elliott's Fair A/E?
1.23, from 80 runners with a computed fair probability in 2005. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
R P Elliott·SR 6.3%·A/E 1.23
KTB
Cookies on Kickthebookies
We use essential cookies to run the site and remember your betslip. No advertising or tracking cookies, ever. By continuing to use this site, you agree. Cookie policy