Skip to content
Trainer profile

Regis Schmidlin

179 runners in the last 5 seasons · 29 individual horses
As at 20 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner 3 days ago 97% of runners over jumps
from 1 Jan 2022
10–179
Wins / Runs
5.6%
Strike rate
n=179
30 (17%)
Placed
1.06
n=179 · 0.89 incl. margin
−8.10
£1 level stake
n=179 at SP · −4.5%
£638k
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
6.7%
KTB Yard Profile

Sends out around 40 runners a season, almost all over hurdles and fences, winning with 6% of them — beating the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 1.06). In Group and Graded company the record reads 9% (46 runs).

Deterministic profile computed from 179 archived runs (last 5 seasons) · updated 20 Oct 2026
KTB at a glance Group/Graded: 8.7%
The read

In Group and Graded company the record reads well at 8.7% (n=46, Fair A/E 1.55), but horses returning fresh after 61+ days have been a poor signal at 0% (n=47, Fair A/E 0.00). The yard also reads well in Chase races (9.7%, n=31) and in Class 1 (8.7%, n=46). The market has also underrated the yard off a 15-30-day break: Fair A/E 1.38 across 71 runners (8.5% strike, +11.90 to a £1 stake). The record reads poorly off a 61-180-day break — 0% over 41 runners, 5.6pts below the baseline. 4 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Prix Gerald de Rochefort at Auteuil (FR) (Apr 2026, £42,000).

Written from the figures on this page — every claim carries its sample. Descriptive, not a tip.

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 5.6% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
0%−5.6
n=47 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −47.00
New recruits · first run for the yard
0%−5.6
n=10 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −10.00
Debutants · first career start
0%−5.6
n=19 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −19.00
First-time headgear · true-first definition
4.5%−1.1
n=22 · A/E 0.93 · £1 −13.60
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
25%+19.4
n=4 · A/E 11.86 · £1 +25.00
When favourite
16.7%
n=6 · A/E 0.57 · £1 −2.50
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
5.3%−0.3
n=57 · A/E 1.06 · £1 −2.30
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
8.7%+3.1
n=46 · A/E 1.55 · £1 +25.30

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 5.6% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
Off a 61-180-day break 0% vs 5.6% · n=41
With Nathanael Ferreira 10.9% vs 5.6% · n=46
With a new jockey booking 2.2% vs 5.6% · n=89
In Chase races 9.7% vs 5.6% · n=31
Off a 15-30-day break 8.5% vs 5.6% · n=71
In Class 1 8.7% vs 5.6% · n=46
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Race type

TypeRWSR£1
Hurdle 141 7 5% −24.10
Chase 31 3 9.7% +23.00
Flat 6 0 0% −6.00
NH Flat 1 0 0% −1.00

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Heavy 92 5 5.4% −21.40
Soft 82 5 6.1% +18.30
Good to Soft 2 0 0% −2.00
Good 2 0 0% −2.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Auteuil (FR) 123 8 6.5% +2.50
Compiegne (FR) 35 2 5.7% +10.40
Fontainebleau (FR) 11 0 0% −11.00
Longchamp (FR) 3 0 0% −3.00
Saint-Cloud (FR) 3 0 0% −3.00
Cagnes-Sur-Mer (FR) 2 0 0% −2.00
Dieppe (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00
Vittel (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 1 46 4 8.7% +25.30
Class 3 5 0 0% −5.00
Class 2 1 0 0% −1.00
Class 4 1 0 0% −1.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 6 1 16.7% 0.57 −2.50
2nd–3rd fav 11 1 9.1% 0.81 −3.40
4th–6th fav 48 5 10.4% 1.55 +17.60
7th+ in betting 114 3 2.6% 0.94 −19.80
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Jumping record

completion over obstacles · same window as header
76.3% completed · 169 obstacle runners (chases & hurdles)
CodeRCompFURPUBDOth
Chase 30 76.7% 1 2 4 0 0
Hurdle 139 76.3% 4 2 27 0 0
Chases and hurdles only — bumpers have no obstacles, so completion is not a question there. F fell · UR unseated rider · PU pulled up · BD brought down · Oth covers refusals, slip-ups, run-outs and the rare disqualification. Non-runners are excluded throughout. Rows under n=30 are shown faded. A descriptive record, not a tip.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Jumper Baie (FR) 32 2 11 17 Oct 26
Foret Vierge (FR)from D Windrif 21 1 2 27 May 25
Terra Bella (FR) 17 1 3 17 Nov 24
Louminos (FR) 15 3 3 6 Oct 26
Parovna (FR)from J-L Pelletan · then A S & D Allard 12 0 1 24 Nov 23
Halleluia (FR)from D Windrif 11 1 3 10 Apr 23
Rue Barbizon (FR) 7 1 1 24 Mar 24
Mittani (FR) 6 0 1 20 Oct 25
Forest Crown (FR) 5 0 0 11 Mar 26
Sound Traou Land (FR) 5 1 1 20 Oct 25
French Buck's (FR) 5 0 0 28 Oct 23
All 29 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 29 horses listed, 10 arrived from another yard in our archive, most often from D Windrif (2) and H De Lageneste & G Macaire (2); 19 had their first archived run for this yard.

2 have since run for another yard; 27 have no later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

Current form

significance-gated

Last 14 days

Small sample
0 from 5
Only 5 runners in the last 14 days — too few to read against the baseline (gate: n≥15). The card states the sample and stays neutral.

When the yard fires

strike by month, 5 seasons
JFMAMJJASOND
00146080·041050
A jumps yard: the season runs Oct–Apr. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
26% of all rides
10.9% SR · A/E 2.14
RiderRWSR£1
Nathanael Ferreira 46 5 10.9% +63.00
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2022→
10
Archived wins
4
Pattern / graded wins
£638k
Prize money
2024
Best season · 4 wins
Louminos (FR) — Prix Gerald de Rochefort (Hurdle) (Listed Handicap) (Turf) Auteuil (FR) · Apr 2026 · Listed
£42,000
Rue Barbizon (FR) — Prix le Touquet (Chase) () (4yo) (Turf) Auteuil (FR) · Mar 2024 · Listed
£38,000
Louminos (FR) — Prix Fifrelet (Hurdle) (Listed Handicap) (3yo) (Turf) Auteuil (FR) · Dec 2025 · Listed
£36,446

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Tiger Groom (GB) 6.3% · 2–32
Progeny have won 10.2% of 678 runs since 2008 (81 horses). Strongest on Good to Soft going: 13.9% from 122.
Seabhac (USA) 8.3% · 2–24
Progeny have won 9.5% of 422 runs since 2008 (61 horses).
Kapgarde (FR) 4.8% · 1–21
Progeny have won 12.5% of 6,607 runs since 2008 (723 horses).
Hunter's Light (IRE) 20% · 3–15
Progeny have won 11.1% of 1,319 runs since 2008 (152 horses). Strongest on Good to Soft going: 14.4% from 167. Weakest on Heavy going: 6.3% from 158. Strongest over 2m1f – 2m4f (all codes): 14.6% from 205. Weakest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 7% from 129.
Walzertakt (GER) 0% · 0–12
Progeny have won 10.7% of 364 runs since 2008 (54 horses). Strongest over 2m1f – 2m4f (all codes): 14% from 178.
Martaline (GB) 9.1% · 1–11
Progeny have won 14.2% of 7,340 runs since 2008 (723 horses). Weakest on Standard (AW) going: 9.4% from 128. Weakest over 1m – 1m1f (all codes): 10% from 120.
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 20 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 179 · newest first

The latest 50 of 179 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 5 May 2022 to 17 October 2026.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP
12 Oct 26 Fontainebleau (FR) Naale (FR)J: Nathanael Ferreira Prix Jean-jacques GuyonClass 3 · 17.5f · Heavy · 12 ran 2nd 12/1
03 Oct 26 Fontainebleau (FR) Naale (FR)J: Nathanael Ferreira Prix De La Table Du RoiClass 4 · 17.5f · Heavy · 13 ran 9th 12/1

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is Regis Schmidlin's strike rate?
Regis Schmidlin has won 10 of 179 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 5.6% (as at 20 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does Regis Schmidlin do best at?
Auteuil (FR) by strike rate: 8 wins from 123 runners (6.5%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
Is Regis Schmidlin in form?
Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 5 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
What is Regis Schmidlin's Fair A/E?
1.06, from 179 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 20 October 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).