As at 6 Nov 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last ride Oct 2006100% of rides on the flat
Archive record 2005–2006
No rides from 1 Jan 2008, where our aggregate statistics normally begin — showing the full archive record instead, 5 Apr 2005 to 18 Oct 2006. Figures that need a horse's earlier runs (debuts, time since a run, first-time headgear, new connections, last-time-out winners) are left out: for runs this early our archive cannot see what came before.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
KTB at a glanceClaiming: 8.6%
Riding patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 7.7% baseline
Claiming rides · riding with a claim
8.6%+0.9
n=35 · A/E 2.28 · £1 +3.00
Big fields · 14+ runners
11.1%+3.4
n=18 · A/E 3.70 · £1 +14.00
Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 7.7% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Claiming rides are runs where the rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. Tiles that depend on a horse's earlier runs (debuts, time off, first-time headgear, new connections, last-time-out winners) are not shown on an archive-era record: for runs this early our archive cannot see what came before.
Record by conditions
same window as header
Going
GoingRWSR£1
Good1200%−12.00
Good to Firm900%−9.00
Standard (AW)8225%+13.00
Soft6116.7%+11.00
Good to Soft300%−3.00
Firm100%−1.00
Courses
CourseRWSR£1
Chepstow400%−4.00
Salisbury400%−4.00
Yarmouth400%−4.00
Newbury300%−3.00
Lingfield (AW)300%−3.00
Leicester300%−3.00
Kempton (AW)3266.7%+18.00
Warwick200%−2.00
Wolverhampton (AW)200%−2.00
Newmarket200%−2.00
Goodwood200%−2.00
Bath200%−2.00
Brighton100%−1.00
Beverley100%−1.00
Folkestone11100%+16.00
Class
ClassRWSR£1
Class 52114.8%−15.00
Class 47114.3%+10.00
Class 6700%−7.00
Class 2200%−2.00
Class 32150%+13.00
Market position
In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
2nd–3rd fav11100%7.18+5.00
4th–6th fav900%0.00−9.00
7th+ in betting2926.9%2.74+3.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.
Distance
DistanceRWSR£1
6f – 7f2514%−8.00
Under 6f8112.5%−2.00
1m2f – 1m4f400%−4.00
1m5f – 2m100%−1.00
1m – 1m1f11100%+14.00
By season
By seasonRWSR£1
20052015%−3.00
200619210.5%+2.00
Handicaps
HandicapsRWSR£1
Handicaps29310.3%+9.00
Field size
Field sizeRWSR£1
11-13 runners1516.7%−9.00
14-16 runners13215.4%+19.00
8-10 runners600%−6.00
17+ runners500%−5.00
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
All 30 horses ridden in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
By month
strike by month, 2005–2006
JFMAMJJASOND
···5000002000·
A flat rider: the season runs Mar–Oct. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.
In our archive from its very first year (2005), so this career almost certainly began earlier than our record does. The figures above count 2005 onwards only — what the archive holds, not a full-career total. On this page the header statistics and this card both count from the archive floor (2005), so they agree.
Progeny have won 9.4% of 10,803 runs since 2005 (673 horses). Weakest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 0.8% from 251.
Cadeaux Genereux (GB)33.3% · 1–3
Progeny have won 10.5% of 5,227 runs since 2005 (333 horses). Weakest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 7.3% from 400.
Lujain (USA)0% · 0–3
Progeny have won 7.9% of 3,111 runs since 2005 (179 horses). Weakest on Soft going: 4.4% from 205. Weakest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 4.1% from 145.
Auction House (USA)0% · 0–2
Progeny have won 6.5% of 2,213 runs since 2006 (178 horses). Strongest over 2m1f – 2m4f (all codes): 10% from 100.
Piccolo (GB)0% · 0–2
Progeny have won 7.9% of 9,146 runs since 2005 (498 horses). Weakest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 3.3% from 367.
Second Empire (IRE)0% · 0–2
Progeny have won 9.2% of 1,591 runs since 2005 (93 horses). Weakest on Heavy going: 5% from 120. Strongest over 2m1f – 2m4f (all codes): 14.2% from 211. Weakest over 1m2f – 1m4f (all codes): 4.8% from 147.
Top line: the rider's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2005, as at 6 Nov 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.
The record
all 39 archived runs · newest first
Every one of Aurelio Medeiros's 39 archived rides, from 5 April 2005 to 18 October 2006, newest first — 3 winners among them.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
What is Aurelio Medeiros's strike rate?
Aurelio Medeiros has won 3 of 39 rides between 2005 and 2006, a strike rate of 7.7% (as at 6 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive. Our archive begins in 2005, so anything earlier is not counted.
What is Aurelio Medeiros's Fair A/E?
2.13, from 39 rides with a computed fair probability between 2005 and 2006. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Aurelio Medeiros·SR 7.7%·A/E 2.13
1Tap Share in the toolbar2Scroll down the sheet3Tap Add to Home Screen, then Add
1Open your browser's menu (the three dots)2Tap Add to Home screen or Install app
KTB
Cookies on Kickthebookies
We use essential cookies to run the site and remember your betslip. No advertising or tracking cookies, ever. By continuing to use this site, you agree. Cookie policy