As at 6 Nov 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last ride Oct 2005100% of rides on the flat
Archive record 2005
No rides from 1 Jan 2008, where our aggregate statistics normally begin — showing the full archive record instead, 24 Mar 2005 to 10 Oct 2005. Figures that need a horse's earlier runs (debuts, time since a run, first-time headgear, new connections, last-time-out winners) are left out: for runs this early our archive cannot see what came before.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Riding patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 2.3% baseline
When favourite
100%
n=1 · A/E 3.20 · £1 +1.88
Claiming rides · riding with a claim
0%−2.3
n=43 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −43.00
Big fields · 14+ runners
0%−2.3
n=13 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −13.00
Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 2.3% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Claiming rides are runs where the rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. Tiles that depend on a horse's earlier runs (debuts, time off, first-time headgear, new connections, last-time-out winners) are not shown on an archive-era record: for runs this early our archive cannot see what came before.
Notable angles
vs their own baseline
When claiming0% vs 2.3% · n=43
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.
Record by conditions
same window as header
Going
GoingRWSR£1
Standard (AW)1800%−18.00
Good to Firm1200%−12.00
Good500%−5.00
Firm4125%−1.12
Soft400%−4.00
Good to Soft100%−1.00
Courses
CourseRWSR£1
Wolverhampton1000%−10.00
Lingfield (AW)500%−5.00
Folkestone400%−4.00
Yarmouth400%−4.00
Southwell (AW)300%−3.00
Catterick2150%+0.88
Hamilton200%−2.00
Thirsk200%−2.00
Brighton200%−2.00
Bath200%−2.00
Warwick100%−1.00
Southwell100%−1.00
Chester100%−1.00
Beverley100%−1.00
Goodwood100%−1.00
Class
ClassRWSR£1
Class 62314.3%−20.12
Class 51000%−10.00
Class 7800%−8.00
Class 4200%−2.00
Class 2100%−1.00
Market position
In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite11100%3.20+1.88
2nd–3rd fav400%0.00−4.00
4th–6th fav700%0.00−7.00
7th+ in betting3200%0.00−32.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.
Distance
DistanceRWSR£1
6f – 7f2400%−24.00
Under 6f800%−8.00
1m – 1m1f600%−6.00
1m2f – 1m4f5120%−2.12
1m5f – 2m100%−1.00
Handicaps
HandicapsRWSR£1
Handicaps2514%−22.12
Field size
Field sizeRWSR£1
11-13 runners1700%−17.00
8-10 runners800%−8.00
14-16 runners700%−7.00
17+ runners600%−6.00
5-7 runners5120%−2.12
2-4 runners100%−1.00
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
All 29 horses ridden in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
By month
strike by month, 2005
JFMAMJJASOND
··000025000··
A flat rider: the season runs Mar–Oct. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.
In our archive from its very first year (2005), so this career almost certainly began earlier than our record does. The figures above count 2005 onwards only — what the archive holds, not a full-career total. On this page the header statistics and this card both count from the archive floor (2005), so they agree.
Progeny have won 6.7% of 972 runs since 2005 (55 horses).
Tipsy Creek (USA)0% · 0–4
Progeny have won 5.2% of 978 runs since 2005 (64 horses).
Daggers Drawn (USA)0% · 0–3
Progeny have won 8.2% of 2,233 runs since 2005 (176 horses). Weakest on Soft going: 4.6% from 239. Weakest over 2m1f – 2m4f (all codes): 4.8% from 125.
Lahib (USA)0% · 0–3
Progeny have won 7.5% of 2,439 runs since 2005 (228 horses).
Atraf (GB)50% · 1–2
Progeny have won 8.5% of 2,518 runs since 2005 (139 horses). Strongest at trips under 6f (all codes): 11.6% from 249. Weakest over 1m – 1m1f (all codes): 4.7% from 297.
Dracula (AUS)0% · 0–2
Progeny have won 2.8% of 144 runs since 2005 (15 horses).
Top line: the rider's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2005, as at 6 Nov 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.
The record
all 44 archived runs · newest first
Every one of Sheldon Russell's 44 archived rides, from 24 March 2005 to 10 October 2005, newest first — one winner among them.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
What is Sheldon Russell's strike rate?
Sheldon Russell has won 1 of 44 rides in 2005, a strike rate of 2.3% (as at 6 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive. Our archive begins in 2005, so anything earlier is not counted.
What is Sheldon Russell's Fair A/E?
0.46, from 43 rides with a computed fair probability in 2005. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Sheldon Russell·SR 2.3%·A/E 0.46
1Tap Share in the toolbar2Scroll down the sheet3Tap Add to Home Screen, then Add
1Open your browser's menu (the three dots)2Tap Add to Home screen or Install app
KTB
Cookies on Kickthebookies
We use essential cookies to run the site and remember your betslip. No advertising or tracking cookies, ever. By continuing to use this site, you agree. Cookie policy