Skip to content
Trainer profile

C Dubourg

107 runners in the last 5 seasons · 33 individual horses
As at 20 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner 8 days ago 98% of runners over jumps
from 1 Jan 2022
6–107
Wins / Runs
5.6%
Strike rate
n=107
29 (27%)
Placed
0.56
n=106 · 0.46 incl. margin
−75.20
£1 level stake
n=107 at SP · −70.3%
£361k
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
0%
KTB Yard Profile

Sends out around 20 runners a season, almost all over hurdles and fences, winning with 6% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 0.56).

Deterministic profile computed from 107 archived runs (last 5 seasons) · updated 20 Oct 2026
KTB at a glance Fresh horses: 6.8% K Dubourg: 1.7% from 60
The read

The record is strongest at Compiegne (FR) (11.6%, n=43), clear of the yard's 5.6% baseline. It is weakest at Auteuil (FR) (2.1% over 48 runners) — the largest sample in the record, and the widest gap. K Dubourg rides 56% of the entries and sits below the yard's average (1.7% vs 5.6%, A/E 0.18). The yard also reads well over 2m5f – 3m (13.3%, n=30). The market has consistently overbet the yard over 2m1f – 2m4f: Fair A/E 0.30 across 75 runners (2.7% strike, −63.00 to a £1 stake) — runners there underperform what the price implies. The stable star of the record: Donne Le Change (FR) — 6 wins from 23 runs for the yard.

Written from the figures on this page — every claim carries its sample. Descriptive, not a tip.

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 5.6% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
6.8%+1.2
n=44 · A/E 0.75 · £1 −27.40
New recruits · first run for the yard
0%−5.6
n=10 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −10.00
Debutants · first career start
0%−5.6
n=20 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −20.00
First-time headgear · true-first definition
0%−5.6
n=21 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −21.00
When favourite
12.5%
n=8 · A/E 0.50 · £1 −5.40
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
11.1%+5.5
n=9 · A/E 0.83 · £1 −6.40
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
0%−5.6
n=16 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −16.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 5.6% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
Over 2m5f – 3m 13.3% vs 5.6% · n=30
At Compiegne (FR) 11.6% vs 5.6% · n=43
With K Dubourg 1.7% vs 5.6% · n=60
At Auteuil (FR) 2.1% vs 5.6% · n=48
Over 2m1f – 2m4f 2.7% vs 5.6% · n=75
In Chase races 7.5% vs 5.6% · n=53 · A/E 0.66
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Race type

TypeRWSR£1
Chase 53 4 7.5% −33.20
Hurdle 52 2 3.8% −40.00
Flat 2 0 0% −2.00

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Heavy 51 3 5.9% −35.80
Soft 51 3 5.9% −34.40
Good to Soft 2 0 0% −2.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Auteuil (FR) 48 1 2.1% −42.00
Compiegne (FR) 43 5 11.6% −17.20
Craon (FR) 5 0 0% −5.00
Dieppe (FR) 4 0 0% −4.00
Fontainebleau (FR) 3 0 0% −3.00
Senonnes-Pouance (FR) 2 0 0% −2.00
Saint-Malo (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00
Moulins (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 1 16 0 0% −16.00
Class 3 3 0 0% −3.00
Class 4 2 0 0% −2.00
Class 2 1 0 0% −1.00
Class 5 1 0 0% −1.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 8 1 12.5% 0.50 −5.40
2nd–3rd fav 27 5 18.5% 1.11 +2.20
4th–6th fav 38 0 0% 0.00 −38.00
7th+ in betting 34 0 0% 0.00 −34.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Jumping record

completion over obstacles · same window as header
80% completed · 105 obstacle runners (chases & hurdles)
CodeRCompFURPUBDOth
Chase 53 79.2% 4 3 4 0 0
Hurdle 52 80.8% 3 0 7 0 0
Chases and hurdles only — bumpers have no obstacles, so completion is not a question there. F fell · UR unseated rider · PU pulled up · BD brought down · Oth covers refusals, slip-ups, run-outs and the rare disqualification. Non-runners are excluded throughout. Rows under n=30 are shown faded. A descriptive record, not a tip.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Donne Le Change (FR) 16 4 8 11 Nov 25
Kap Lord (FR) 10 0 2 15 Nov 25
Neon Has (FR) 8 0 3 26 Sep 26
Libellia Antique (FR) 6 0 0 7 Sep 26
Pearl Tree (FR)from H-A Pantall 5 1 3 5 Mar 23
Lovely Jap (FR) 4 1 1 1 Mar 26
Inea Jap (FR) 4 0 1 15 Apr 25
Rebelote Has 3 0 1 12 Oct 26
Hillico Conti (FR) 3 0 0 3 Oct 26
Jazzy Conti (FR) 3 0 0 26 Sep 26
All 33 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 33 horses listed, 11 arrived from another yard in our archive, most often from Francois Nicolle (5) and A Chaille-Chaille (2); 22 had their first archived run for this yard.

None of them has a later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

Current form

significance-gated

Last 14 days

Small sample
0 from 2
Only 2 runners in the last 14 days — too few to read against the baseline (gate: n≥15). The card states the sample and stays neutral.

When the yard fires

strike by month, 5 seasons
JFMAMJJASOND
··05130000713·
A jumps yard: the season runs Oct–Apr. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
Go-to riderK Dubourg
56% of all rides
1.7% SR · A/E 0.18
RiderRWSR£1
K Dubourg 60 1 1.7% −55.00
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2011→
14
Archived wins
£621k
Prize money
2025
Best season · 3 wins
Djazzman (FR) — Prix Jasmin II (Chase) (AQPS Conditions) (5yo) (Turf) Auteuil (FR) · May 2018
£21,239
Donne Le Change (FR) — Prix Fernand Roy (Chase) (AQPS Conditions) (6yo+) (Turf) Compiegne (FR) · Mar 2020
£20,339
Lovely Jap (FR) — Prix Gerard Philippeau (Hurdle) (Conditions) (4yo) (Turf) Auteuil (FR) · Nov 2025
£19,388

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Saddler Maker (IRE) 25% · 4–16
Progeny have won 16.9% of 2,169 runs since 2008 (181 horses). Weakest beyond 3m (all codes): 11.3% from 221.
Kap Rock (FR) 0% · 0–10
Progeny have won 9.7% of 556 runs since 2008 (80 horses).
Kapgarde (FR) 0% · 0–10
Progeny have won 12.5% of 6,607 runs since 2008 (723 horses).
Masterstroke (USA) 0% · 0–8
Progeny have won 9.6% of 830 runs since 2008 (138 horses). Weakest on Heavy going: 6% from 199.
Great Pretender (IRE) 0% · 0–7
Progeny have won 13% of 3,532 runs since 2008 (410 horses). Strongest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 16.5% from 728. Weakest over 1m2f – 1m4f (all codes): 6.6% from 151.
Beaumec De Houelle (FR) 16.7% · 1–6
Progeny have won 11% of 529 runs since 2008 (139 horses). Strongest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 14.5% from 145.
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 20 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 189 · newest first

The latest 50 of 189 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 14 September 2011 to 12 October 2026.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP
09 Jul 26 Dieppe (FR) Miss TahoeJ: K Dubourg Prix De L'ouest Hurdle4 · 17f · Soft · 9 ran 3rd 7/1

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is C Dubourg's strike rate?
C Dubourg has won 6 of 107 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 5.6% (as at 20 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does C Dubourg do best at?
Compiegne (FR) by strike rate: 5 wins from 43 runners (11.6%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
Who rides most for C Dubourg?
K Dubourg, with 60 runners since 2022 — 56% of the total. That pairing has won 1 (1.7%).
Is C Dubourg in form?
Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 2 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
What is C Dubourg's Fair A/E?
0.56, from 106 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 20 October 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).