D Sourdeau De Beauregard
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 80 runners a season, almost all over hurdles and fences, winning with 13% of them — beating the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 1.12). New recruits from other yards win at 18% first time out (34 runs).
The record is strongest at Compiegne (FR) (20.9%, n=110), clear of the yard's 12.6% baseline. It is weakest at Auteuil (FR) (9.3% over 247 runners) — the largest sample in the record, and the widest gap. New recruits from other stables on their first run win at 17.6% (n=34, Fair A/E 1.95), but in Group and Graded company the record reads poorly at 9.6% (n=115, Fair A/E 0.94). Clement Lefebvre rides 31% of the entries and edges the yard's average (15.2% vs 12.6%, A/E 1.12) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The yard also reads well in Chase races (16.1%, n=137). The record reads poorly off a break of 180+ days — 7.3% over 41 runners, 5.3pts below the baseline. 19 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Prix des Drags at Auteuil (FR) (Jun 2022, £83,193). Seasonally, the yard fires Mar–May.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 12.6% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 12.6% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Jumping record
completion over obstacles · same window as headerHorses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Small sampleWhen the yard fires
strike by month, 5 seasonsJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2008→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 1,007 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 1,007 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 16 April 2008 to 6 November 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is D Sourdeau De Beauregard's strike rate?
- D Sourdeau De Beauregard has won 53 of 420 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 12.6% (as at 7 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does D Sourdeau De Beauregard do best at?
- Compiegne (FR) by strike rate: 23 wins from 110 runners (20.9%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for D Sourdeau De Beauregard?
- Clement Lefebvre, with 132 runners since 2022 — 31% of the total. That pairing has won 20 (15.2%).
- Is D Sourdeau De Beauregard in form?
- Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 10 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
- What is D Sourdeau De Beauregard's Fair A/E?
- 1.12, from 417 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.