Skip to content
Trainer profile

Josef Vana Jr

128 runners in the lifetime window · 50 individual horses
As at 7 Nov 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Won yesterday Last runner yesterday 100% of runners over jumps
from 1 Jan 2008 — the aggregate floor: every horse in the window has a complete captured career behind it
4–128
Wins / Runs
3.1%
Strike rate
n=128
27 (21%)
Placed
0.58
n=122 · 0.47 incl. margin
−88.80
£1 level stake
n=123 at SP · −72.2%
£391k
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
3.7%
KTB Yard Profile

Sends out around 10 runners a season, almost all over hurdles and fences, winning with 3% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 0.58).

Deterministic profile computed from 128 archived runs (lifetime window) · updated 7 Nov 2026
KTB at a glance Josef Bartos: 3.3% from 61
The read

Josef Bartos rides 48% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (3.3%, A/E 0.73). The market has consistently overbet the yard in Chase races: Fair A/E 0.32 across 67 runners (1.5% strike, −52.00 to a £1 stake) — runners there underperform what the price implies. One Group or Graded win sits in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Grand Prix De La Ville De Nice - Bernard Secly at Cagnes-Sur-Mer (FR) (Jan 2023, £61,327).

Written from the figures on this page — every claim carries its sample. Descriptive, not a tip.

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 3.1% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
1.6%−1.5
n=64 · A/E 0.32 · £1 −55.20
New recruits · first run for the yard
4.2%+1.1
n=24 · A/E 0.92 · £1 −16.20
Debutants · first career start
3.8%+0.7
n=26 · A/E 0.97 · £1 −15.50
First-time headgear · true-first definition
5.3%+2.2
n=19 · A/E 1.33 · £1 −11.50
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
0%−3.1
n=1 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −1.00
When favourite
0%
n=4 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −4.00
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
0%−3.1
n=16 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −16.00
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
3.3%+0.2
n=30 · A/E 1.25 · £1 −17.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 3.1% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
In Hurdle races 4.9% vs 3.1% · n=61 · A/E 0.81
In Chase races 1.5% vs 3.1% · n=67 · A/E 0.32
With a new jockey booking 3.9% vs 3.1% · n=76 · A/E 0.81
On Soft going 2.4% vs 3.1% · n=84 · A/E 0.45
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Race type

TypeRWSR£1
Chase 67 1 1.5% −52.00
Hurdle 61 3 4.9% −36.80

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Soft 84 2 2.4% −65.70
Heavy 44 2 4.5% −23.10

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Cagnes-Sur-Mer (FR) 45 2 4.4% −26.10
Auteuil (FR) 32 1 3.1% −24.20
Compiegne (FR) 25 0 0% −25.00
Dieppe (FR) 9 0 0% −9.00
Fontainebleau (FR) 5 1 20% +2.50
Lyon Parilly (FR) 4 0 0% −2.00
Pau (FR) 2 0 0% −1.00
Nancy (FR) 2 0 0% —
Clairefontaine (FR) 2 0 0% −2.00
Vichy (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00
Le Lion-D'Angers (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 1 30 1 3.3% −17.00
Class 3 2 1 50% +5.50
Class 4 2 0 0% −2.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 4 0 0% 0.00 −4.00
2nd–3rd fav 13 1 7.7% 0.52 −6.10
4th–6th fav 32 2 6.3% 0.88 −16.70
7th+ in betting 74 1 1.4% 0.48 −62.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Jumping record

completion over obstacles · same window as header
79.7% completed · 128 obstacle runners (chases & hurdles)
CodeRCompFURPUBDOth
Chase 67 76.1% 7 5 4 0 0
Hurdle 61 83.6% 2 0 8 0 0
Chases and hurdles only — bumpers have no obstacles, so completion is not a question there. F fell · UR unseated rider · PU pulled up · BD brought down · Oth covers refusals, slip-ups, run-outs and the rare disqualification. Non-runners are excluded throughout. Rows under n=30 are shown faded. A descriptive record, not a tip.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Capivari (FR)from Josef Vana · then M Seror 13 0 3 8 Dec 23
Sternkranz (GER)from Josef Vana 10 0 1 23 Mar 26
Lord Dragon (FR) 10 0 1 21 May 23
Suroit (FR)from D Cottin 9 1 2 26 Apr 25
Gap Pierji (FR) 6 0 0 29 May 25
Kapjahr (FR) 5 0 0 30 Mar 23
Kapteen (FR)from Robert Collet 4 0 2 26 May 26
Passion Return (IRE) 4 0 2 19 Dec 22
Billy Jango (IRE) 3 0 1 7 Aug 26
Le Petit Nice (FR)from R Chotard 3 0 2 15 Jul 26
All 50 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 50 horses listed, 24 arrived from another yard in our archive, most often from Daniela Mele (4) and D Bressou (2); 26 had their first archived run for this yard.

1 has since run for another yard; 49 have no later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

Current form

significance-gated

Last 14 days

Small sample
1 from 2
Only 2 runners in the last 14 days — too few to read against the baseline (gate: n≥15). The card states the sample and stays neutral.

When the yard fires

strike by month, lifetime
JFMAMJJASOND
110005000·0170
A jumps yard: the season runs Oct–Apr. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
Go-to riderJosef Bartos
48% of all rides
3.3% SR · A/E 0.73
RiderRWSR£1
Josef Bartos 61 2 3.3% −38.10
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2020→
4
Archived wins
1
Pattern / graded wins
£391k
Prize money
2026
Best season · 1 win
Suroit (FR) — Grand Prix De La Ville De Nice - Bernard Secly (Chase) (Turf) Cagnes-Sur-Mer (FR) · Jan 2023 · Grade 3
£61,327
Quantum Memories (GER) — Prix Du Debucher Fontainebleau (FR) · Nov 2026 · Class 3
£11,040
First Polar (FR) — Prix du Morbihan (Hurdle) (Claimer) (5yo+) (Apprentice & Young Jockeys) (Turf) Auteuil (FR) · May 2025
£9,884
Notable horses
Suroit (FR) First Polar (FR) Edinson (FR) Quantum Memories (GER)

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Kapgarde (FR) 0% · 0–14
Progeny have won 12.4% of 6,637 runs since 2008 (725 horses).
Kamsin (GER) 0% · 0–13
Progeny have won 9.7% of 848 runs since 2015 (110 horses). Strongest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 12.9% from 186.
Yeats (IRE) 0% · 0–13
Progeny have won 11.9% of 9,845 runs since 2013 (707 horses). Weakest on Standard (AW) going: 6.9% from 204. Strongest beyond 3m (all codes): 15.2% from 820.
Dragon Dancer (GB) 0% · 0–10
Progeny have won 9% of 578 runs since 2013 (80 horses). Strongest on Good going: 12.3% from 162.
Linda's Lad (GB) 11.1% · 1–9
Progeny have won 8.2% of 1,323 runs since 2012 (186 horses). Strongest over 2m5f – 3m (all codes): 11.6% from 215.
Karaktar (IRE) 20% · 1–5
Progeny have won 12.8% of 743 runs since 2021 (150 horses). Weakest on Heavy going: 9.5% from 263. Strongest over 2m5f – 3m (all codes): 18.6% from 140.
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 7 Nov 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 128 · newest first

The latest 50 of 128 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 25 June 2020 to 6 November 2026.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP
06 Nov 26 Fontainebleau (FR) Quantum Memories (GER)J: Felix De Giles Prix Du DebucherClass 3 · 19f · Soft · 9 ran 1st 13/2
17 Oct 26 Auteuil (FR) Matmatah (FR)J: Felix De Giles Prix OrcadaClass 1 · 22f · Heavy · 7 ran 5th 80/1
10 Jul 26 Dieppe (FR) MadrileneJ: J Kratochvil Prix Revenge Chase4 · 19.5f · Soft · 8 ran 7th 25/1

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is Josef Vana Jr's strike rate?
Josef Vana Jr has won 4 of 128 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 3.1% (as at 7 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does Josef Vana Jr do best at?
Cagnes-Sur-Mer (FR) by strike rate: 2 wins from 45 runners (4.4%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
Who rides most for Josef Vana Jr?
Josef Bartos, with 61 runners since 2008 — 48% of the total. That pairing has won 2 (3.3%).
Is Josef Vana Jr in form?
Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 2 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
What is Josef Vana Jr's Fair A/E?
0.58, from 122 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 7 November 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).