Skip to content
Trainer profile

Mme C Janssen

112 runners in the lifetime window · 10 individual horses
As at 11 Nov 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner 4 days ago 100% of runners on the flat
from 1 Jan 2008 — the aggregate floor: every horse in the window has a complete captured career behind it
3–112
Wins / Runs
2.7%
Strike rate
n=112
9 (8%)
Placed
0.59
n=112 · 0.49 incl. margin
−53.80
£1 level stake
n=112 at SP · −48.0%
£65,652
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
0%
KTB Yard Profile

Sends out around 10 runners a season, almost all on the flat, winning with 3% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 0.59).

Deterministic profile computed from 112 archived runs (lifetime window) · updated 11 Nov 2026
KTB at a glance Ludovic Boisseau: 4.6% from 65
The read

Ludovic Boisseau rides 58% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (4.6%, A/E 1.07) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The yard also reads well over 1m – 1m1f (6.7%, n=30).

Written from the figures on this page — every claim carries its sample. Descriptive, not a tip.

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 2.7% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
0%−2.7
n=28 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −28.00
New recruits · first run for the yard
0%−2.7
n=5 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −5.00
Debutants · first career start
0%−2.7
n=5 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −5.00
First-time headgear · true-first definition
0%−2.7
n=3 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −3.00
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
0%−2.7
n=3 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −3.00
When favourite
0%
n=1 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −1.00
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
0%−2.7
n=29 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −29.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 2.7% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
Over 1m – 1m1f 6.7% vs 2.7% · n=30
At Chantilly (FR) 0% vs 2.7% · n=34
With a new jockey booking 0% vs 2.7% · n=31
Off a 15-30-day break 5.1% vs 2.7% · n=39
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Standard (AW) 48 1 2.1% −26.90
Soft 24 0 0% −24.00
Good 20 1 5% +3.90
Good to Soft 14 1 7.1% −0.80
Heavy 6 0 0% −6.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Deauville (FR) 35 1 2.9% −13.90
Chantilly (FR) 34 0 0% −34.00
Saint-Cloud (FR) 21 1 4.8% +2.90
Longchamp (FR) 8 0 0% −8.00
Maisons-Laffitte (FR) 7 1 14.3% +6.20
Dieppe (FR) 3 0 0% −3.00
Le Touquet (FR) 2 0 0% −2.00
Fontainebleau (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00
Compiegne (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 3 5 0 0% −5.00
Class 4 5 0 0% −5.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 1 0 0% 0.00 −1.00
2nd–3rd fav 8 0 0% 0.00 −8.00
4th–6th fav 18 0 0% 0.00 −18.00
7th+ in betting 85 3 3.5% 1.26 −26.80
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Two Two Two (FR) 33 0 1 16 Oct 26
Texas Bright Moon (FR) 22 0 4 21 Jun 22
Beijing Eight (GER) 15 1 1 25 Sep 20
With Zest (FR)from Mario Baratti 12 0 0 7 Nov 26
Wind Spirit (FR)from F Chappet 10 1 1 3 Feb 23
Aimee (IRE)from Mlle B Renk · then G Bernaud 9 1 1 15 May 17
Keep Cool (GB)from Andreas Lowe · then G Verheye 6 0 1 27 Dec 13
Do It Yourself (IRE) 3 0 0 4 Nov 13
Genovaa (FR) 1 0 0 9 Feb 17
Perpignon (FR)from N Sauer 1 0 0 2 Jan 12
All 10 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 10 horses listed, 5 arrived from another yard in our archive; 5 had their first archived run for this yard.

2 have since run for another yard; 8 have no later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

Current form

significance-gated

Last 14 days

Small sample
0 from 1
Only 1 runners in the last 14 days — too few to read against the baseline (gate: n≥15). The card states the sample and stays neutral.

When the yard fires

strike by month, lifetime
JFMAMJJASOND
140001000010000
A flat yard: the season runs Mar–Oct. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
Go-to riderLudovic Boisseau
58% of all rides
4.6% SR · A/E 1.07
RiderRWSR£1
Ludovic Boisseau 65 3 4.6% −6.80
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2007→
3
Archived wins
£67,375
Prize money
2022
Best season · 1 win
This card is the full archive census (2005→); the statistics in the header aggregate from 2008 — the floor that guarantees every horse a complete captured career — so this card can legitimately show more wins than the header.
Wind Spirit (FR) — Prix du Bassin du Commerce (Handicap) (4yo+) (All-Weather Track) (Polytrack) Deauville (FR) · Jan 2022
£10,504
Beijing Eight (GER) — Prix du Lieu Manchon (Handicap) (5yo+) (Turf) Maisons-Laffitte (FR) · May 2019
£8,559
Aimee (IRE) — Prix Incertitude (Handicap) (4yo) (Turf) Saint-Cloud (FR) · Sep 2016
£6,985

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
George Vancouver (USA) 0% · 0–33
Progeny have won 5.9% of 1,181 runs since 2017 (132 horses). Weakest on Good going: 2.4% from 124.
Mamool (IRE) 0% · 0–22
Progeny have won 12.5% of 606 runs since 2010 (61 horses). Strongest on Good going: 17.2% from 186. Weakest on Good to Soft going: 8.4% from 107. Strongest over 2m1f – 2m4f (all codes): 17.6% from 165. Weakest over 1m2f – 1m4f (all codes): 8.6% from 139.
Jukebox Jury (IRE) 6.7% · 1–15
Progeny have won 13.5% of 2,259 runs since 2016 (257 horses). Weakest on Standard (AW) going: 10.3% from 155.
Romanised (IRE) 0% · 0–12
Progeny have won 8.5% of 658 runs since 2024 (115 horses). Strongest on Standard (AW) going: 12.3% from 227. Weakest on Soft going: 4.7% from 149.
Charm Spirit (IRE) 10% · 1–10
Progeny have won 9.3% of 3,838 runs since 2018 (339 horses). Strongest on Good to Firm going: 15% from 448. Weakest on Heavy going: 3.7% from 135. Strongest at trips under 6f (all codes): 13% from 446.
Alfred Nobel (IRE) 11.1% · 1–9
Progeny have won 7% of 985 runs since 2014 (63 horses).
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 11 Nov 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 113 · newest first

The latest 50 of 113 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 22 October 2007 to 7 November 2026.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP
09 Sep 26 Dieppe (FR) Two Two Two (FR)J: Eddy Hardouin Prix De LeersClass 4 · 5.5f · Soft · 11 ran 6th 11/1
24 Aug 26 Dieppe (FR) Two Two Two (FR)J: Eddy Hardouin Prix De L'arbre A PapillonsClass 4 · 5.5f · Very Soft · 12 ran 8th 15/2
26 Jul 26 Le Touquet (FR) Two Two Two (FR)J: Eddy Hardouin Prix Du PmuClass 4 · 6.5f · Soft · 13 ran 6th 5/1

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is Mme C Janssen's strike rate?
Mme C Janssen has won 3 of 112 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 2.7% (as at 11 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does Mme C Janssen do best at?
Deauville (FR) by strike rate: 1 wins from 35 runners (2.9%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
Who rides most for Mme C Janssen?
Ludovic Boisseau, with 65 runners since 2008 — 58% of the total. That pairing has won 3 (4.6%).
Is Mme C Janssen in form?
Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 1 runner, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
What is Mme C Janssen's Fair A/E?
0.59, from 112 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 11 November 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).