Skip to content
Trainer profile

Mme C Vergne & D Sicaud

52 runners in the lifetime window · 11 individual horses
As at 6 Nov 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner Sep 2010 100% of runners on the flat
No runners in the last 5 seasons — showing the lifetime record, from 1 Jan 2008 — the aggregate floor: every horse in the window has a complete captured career behind it.
4–52
Wins / Runs
7.7%
Strike rate
n=52
7 (14%)
Placed
0.00
n=37 · 0.00 incl. margin
−37.00
£1 level stake
n=37 at SP · −100.0%
£83,234
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
2.6%

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 7.7% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
10%+2.3
n=20 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −9.00
New recruits · first run for the yard
0%−7.7
n=5 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −1.00
Debutants · first career start
0%−7.7
n=6 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −4.00
First-time headgear · true-first definition
11.1%+3.4
n=9 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −6.00
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
0%−7.7
n=1 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −1.00
When favourite
0%
n=2 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −2.00
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
0%−7.7
n=6 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −6.00
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
0%−7.7
n=2 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −1.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 7.7% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
In Flat races 7.7% vs 7.7% · n=52 · A/E 0.00
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Good 25 1 4% −21.00
Good to Soft 12 1 8.3% −9.00
Standard (AW) 6 0 0% −3.00
Heavy 4 1 25% −2.00
Soft 4 0 0% −2.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Maisons-Laffitte (FR) 15 1 6.7% −13.00
Saint-Cloud (FR) 14 2 14.3% −8.00
Longchamp (FR) 8 0 0% −7.00
Chantilly (FR) 6 0 0% −5.00
Deauville (FR) 5 0 0% −3.00
Chatillon-Sur-Chalaronne 1 1 100% —
Fontainebleau (FR) 1 0 0% —
Cagnes-Sur-Mer (FR) 1 0 0% —
Clairefontaine (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 1 2 0 0% −1.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 2 0 0% 0.00 −2.00
2nd–3rd fav 2 0 0% 0.00 −2.00
4th–6th fav 3 0 0% 0.00 −3.00
7th+ in betting 30 0 0% 0.00 −30.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Kenchop (FR)from D Sicaud · then J-V Toux 10 1 1 21 Aug 10
Zillione (FR)from H Billot · then R Le Gal 9 2 3 17 Sep 10
Collingwood (FR)then E J O'Neill 8 1 3 9 Aug 10
Lasos (FR)from C Laffon-Parias · then S Morineau 5 0 0 8 Sep 10
Vlatypas (FR)then Mlle S-V Tarrou 5 0 0 27 Aug 10
Comme Un Accord (FR)then H Billot 4 0 0 18 Aug 10
Lady Of Diktat (FR) 4 0 0 22 May 10
Secret Affair (GB)from F Breuss · then Mlle M Henry 2 0 0 27 Feb 10
Perceneige (FR) 1 0 0 22 May 10
Sissi D'Allemagne (FR) 1 0 0 19 May 10
All 11 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 11 horses listed, 5 arrived from another yard in our archive; 6 had their first archived run for this yard.

7 have since run for another yard; 4 have no later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

When the yard fires

strike by month, lifetime
JFMAMJJASOND
·000000143310050·
A flat yard: the season runs Mar–Oct. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
RiderRWSR£1
Mickael Barzalona 16 3 18.8% −10.00
Vincent Vion 7 0 0% −2.00
Flavien Prat 5 0 0% −5.00
Anthony Crastus 3 0 0% −3.00
Alexandre Champenois 3 0 0% −3.00
Dominique Boeuf 2 0 0% −2.00
Morgan Delalande 2 0 0% −2.00
Michael Martinez 1 1 100% —
Mathias Sautjeau 1 0 0% −1.00
Thierry Thulliez 1 0 0% —
Franck Blondel 1 0 0% −1.00
Romain Richard 1 0 0% −1.00
Muted rows are under 30 rides.

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2009→
4
Archived wins
£83,234
Prize money
2009
Best season · 3 wins
Kenchop (FR) — Prix des Boucles de la Seine (Handicap) Saint-Cloud (FR) · Sep 2009
£21,903
Zillione (FR) — Prix de Louvigny (Handicap) Saint-Cloud (FR) · Nov 2009
£9,223
Zillione (FR) — Prix de Tarbes (Handicap) (Left-Handed) Maisons-Laffitte (FR) · Oct 2009
£9,223

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Nombre Premier (GB) 10% · 1–10
Progeny have won 10.8% of 490 runs since 2008 (68 horses). Strongest over 1m2f – 1m4f (all codes): 16.9% from 118.
Anabaa Blue (GB) 22.2% · 2–9
Progeny have won 9.3% of 1,937 runs since 2008 (227 horses). Strongest on Good to Soft going: 12.6% from 278. Weakest on Standard (AW) going: 6% from 417.
Ocean Of Wisdom (USA) 11.1% · 1–9
Progeny have won 13.1% of 229 runs since 2008 (25 horses).
Dyhim Diamond (IRE) 0% · 0–5
Progeny have won 10.2% of 372 runs since 2008 (48 horses). Weakest on Standard (AW) going: 7% from 115.
Konig Shuffle (GER) 0% · 0–5
Progeny have won 5.1% of 315 runs since 2010 (39 horses).
Miesque's Son (USA) 0% · 0–5
Progeny have won 7.4% of 647 runs since 2008 (72 horses). Weakest on Soft going: 3.8% from 130.
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 6 Nov 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 52 · newest first

The latest 50 of 52 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 30 March 2009 to 17 September 2010.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is Mme C Vergne & D Sicaud's strike rate?
Mme C Vergne & D Sicaud has won 4 of 52 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 7.7% (as at 6 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
What is Mme C Vergne & D Sicaud's Fair A/E?
0.00, from 37 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 6 November 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).