Skip to content
Jockey profile

Miss Phillipa Tutty

102 rides in the lifetime window · 50 individual horses
As at 6 Nov 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last ride Aug 2015
No rides in the last 5 seasons — showing the lifetime record, from 1 Jan 2008 — the aggregate floor: every horse in the window has a complete captured career behind it.
6–102
Wins / Runs
5.9%
Strike rate
n=102
15 (15%)
Placed
0.91
n=101 · 0.76 incl. margin
−47.00
£1 level stake
n=102 at SP · −46.1%
£18,425
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
25%
KTB Rider Profile

Rode around 10 times a season, winning on 6% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 0.91).

Deterministic profile computed from 102 archived runs (lifetime window) · updated 6 Nov 2026
KTB at a glance Claiming: 6%
The read

Rides in big fields of 14 or more have been a poor signal at 2.4% (n=41, Fair A/E 0.44). The rider also read well in Class 6 (10%, n=60). The record read poorly on Good going — 2.9% over 34 rides, 3pts below the baseline.

Written from the figures on this page — every claim carries its sample. Descriptive, not a tip.

Riding patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 5.9% baseline
First ride on the horse · first captured pairing
4%−1.9
n=50 · A/E 0.65 · £1 −32.50
Last-time-out winners · previous run was a win
0%−5.9
n=6 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −6.00
Fresh horses · 61+ days off
0%−5.9
n=13 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −13.00
When favourite
0%
n=1 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −1.00
Claiming rides · riding with a claim
6%+0.1
n=100 · A/E 0.94 · £1 −45.00
Big fields · 14+ runners
2.4%−3.5
n=41 · A/E 0.44 · £1 −32.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 5.9% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. First rides are the first captured pairing of horse and rider; last-time-out winners are horses whose previous captured run was a win; claiming rides are runs where the rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
In Class 6 10% vs 5.9% · n=60
With Karen Tutty 2.3% vs 5.9% · n=44
On Good going 2.9% vs 5.9% · n=34
On Good to Firm going 8.3% vs 5.9% · n=36
On first rides for the horse 4% vs 5.9% · n=50 · A/E 0.65
Over 1m2f – 1m4f 7.7% vs 5.9% · n=52 · A/E 1.17
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Race type

TypeRWSR£1
Flat 82 6 7.3% −27.00
Hurdle 12 0 0% −12.00
Chase 4 0 0% −4.00
NH Flat 4 0 0% −4.00

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Good to Firm 36 3 8.3% −11.00
Good 34 1 2.9% −28.50
Good to Soft 13 1 7.7% −5.50
Soft 13 1 7.7% +4.00
Standard (AW) 5 0 0% −5.00
Heavy 1 0 0% −1.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Beverley 13 3 23.1% +12.00
Catterick 10 0 0% −10.00
Redcar 9 0 0% −9.00
Nottingham 7 1 14.3% +10.00
Musselburgh 6 1 16.7% −0.50
Market Rasen 5 0 0% −5.00
Sedgefield 5 0 0% −5.00
York 4 0 0% −4.00
Hamilton 4 0 0% −4.00
Wetherby 4 0 0% −4.00
Warwick 4 0 0% −4.00
Thirsk 3 0 0% −3.00
Newcastle 3 1 33.3% +4.50
Ripon 3 0 0% −3.00
Ascot 3 0 0% −3.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 6 60 6 10% −5.00
Class 5 24 0 0% −24.00
Class 4 10 0 0% −10.00
Class 3 8 0 0% −8.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 2 0 0% 0.00 −2.00
2nd–3rd fav 18 3 16.7% 1.28 +1.00
4th–6th fav 26 2 7.7% 1.07 −7.00
7th+ in betting 56 1 1.8% 0.49 −39.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses ridden

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Hurricane Thomas (IRE) 33 4 9 15 Jun 12
Shy (GB) 5 0 1 3 Dec 12
Mycenean Prince (USA) 5 0 0 3 Apr 11
Boga (IRE) 4 0 0 4 Oct 11
Harare (GB) 3 0 1 31 Oct 12
Devils And Dust (IRE) 3 0 0 26 Sep 10
Hoar Frost (GB) 2 0 0 15 Oct 12
Resplendent Ace (IRE) 2 0 0 6 Aug 12
Antigua Sunrise (IRE) 2 0 0 16 Jun 12
Kilcaskin Star (IRE) 2 0 0 12 Jan 12
Blandings Castle (GB) 2 0 0 15 May 11
I'm Super Too (IRE) 1 1 1 13 Aug 15
All 50 horses ridden in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.

By month

strike by month, lifetime
JFMAMJJASOND
00000097131200
A flat rider: the season runs Mar–Oct. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Riding for

same window · biggest samples first
Main yardKaren Tutty
43% of all rides
2.3% SR · A/E 0.41
TrainerRWSR£1
Karen Tutty 44 1 2.3% −34.00
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2008→
6
Archived wins
£18,425
Prize money
2009
Best season · 3 wins
Hurricane Thomas (IRE) — Racing Uk Horseracing In Your Home Amateur Riders' Handicap Musselburgh · Jul 2009 · Class 6
£2,498
Hurricane Thomas (IRE) — Dorothy Laird Memorial Trophy Handicap (Ladies Race) (Div 1) Beverley · Jul 2010 · Class 6
£2,388
Hurricane Thomas (IRE) — Brian And Jason Merrington Memorial Amateur Riders' Handicap (Div 1) Beverley · Sep 2009 · Class 6
£2,186

Sires of the horses ridden

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Celtic Swing (GB) 12.1% · 4–33
Progeny have won 9.3% of 2,248 runs since 2008 (160 horses).
Erhaab (USA) 0% · 0–5
Progeny have won 8% of 1,060 runs since 2008 (86 horses).
Swain (IRE) 0% · 0–5
Progeny have won 9.4% of 552 runs since 2008 (40 horses). Strongest on Standard (AW) going: 14.1% from 135.
Invincible Spirit (IRE) 0% · 0–4
Progeny have won 11.9% of 20,863 runs since 2008 (1,574 horses). Strongest on Firm going: 16.1% from 161. Weakest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 7.8% from 844.
Bahhare (USA) 0% · 0–3
Progeny have won 9.2% of 1,314 runs since 2008 (86 horses). Weakest on Soft going: 5.9% from 202.
Cloudings (IRE) 0% · 0–3
Progeny have won 10.5% of 3,887 runs since 2008 (309 horses). Strongest beyond 3m (all codes): 14.6% from 411. Weakest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 7.5% from 815.
Top line: the rider's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 6 Nov 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 102 · newest first

The latest 50 of 102 archived rides, newest first. The full record runs from 1 September 2008 to 13 August 2015.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is Miss Phillipa Tutty's strike rate?
Miss Phillipa Tutty has won 6 of 102 rides since 2008, a strike rate of 5.9% (as at 6 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
What is Miss Phillipa Tutty's Fair A/E?
0.91, from 101 rides with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 6 November 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).