Shane Fenelon
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Rides around 130 times a season, almost all over hurdles and fences, winning on 5% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 0.79). Riding last-time-out winners the record reads 21% (34 rides).
Rides on last-time-out winners have been a positive signal at 20.6% (n=34, Fair A/E 1.11), but rides in big fields of 14 or more have been a poor signal at 2.1% (n=235, Fair A/E 0.71). The market has consistently overbet claiming rides: 4.9% strike, Fair A/E 0.80 and −229.37 to a £1 stake over 593 rides — those runners underperform what the price implies. John Joseph Hanlon supplies 31% of the rides and sits below the rider's average (2.5% vs 5.1%, A/E 0.68). The rider also reads well in Class 4 (13.7%, n=117) and beyond 3m (13.2%, n=53). The standout partner of the record: Rudy Catrail (IRE) — 5 wins from 26 rides together.
Riding patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 5.1% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 5.1% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. First rides are the first captured pairing of horse and rider; last-time-out winners are horses whose previous captured run was a win; claiming rides are runs where the rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Jumping record
completion over obstacles · same window as headerHorses ridden
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Small sampleBy month
strike by month, 5 seasonsRiding for
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2019→Sires of the horses ridden
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 860 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 860 archived rides, newest first. The full record runs from 7 May 2019 to 6 November 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
KTB’s figures
the forward record · since 5 Oct 2026KTB’s figures on this rider’s mounts since 14 Oct 2026: fastest on KTB Speed in 2 runs (won 0) · to 17 Oct 2026.
Each pick was a KTB figure’s choice before the off — the published KTB Selection, the top-rated horse on KTB Rating, the fastest on KTB Speed — settled against the result the next morning and never worked out again; “did not run” is counted apart. GB and Irish races only. A record of weeks so far: read it as a count, not a verdict.
Quick answers
- What is Shane Fenelon's strike rate?
- Shane Fenelon has won 33 of 650 rides since 2022, a strike rate of 5.1% (as at 7 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Shane Fenelon do best at?
- Ffos Las by strike rate: 3 wins from 46 rides (6.5%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most rides on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Which yard does Shane Fenelon ride most for?
- John Joseph Hanlon, with 203 rides since 2022 — 31% of the total. That pairing has won 5 (2.5%).
- Is Shane Fenelon in form?
- Too few rides in the last 14 days to read — 4 rides, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
- What is Shane Fenelon's Fair A/E?
- 0.79, from 650 rides with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.