Skip to content
Trainer profile

Hue & Lamotte D'Argy

47 runners in the lifetime window · 19 individual horses
As at 29 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner Oct 2019
No runners in the last 5 seasons — showing the lifetime record, from 1 Jan 2008 — the aggregate floor: every horse in the window has a complete captured career behind it.
5–47
Wins / Runs
10.6%
Strike rate
n=47
14 (30%)
Placed
1.26
n=46 · 1.19 incl. margin
+16.60
£1 level stake
n=47 at SP · +35.3%
£205k
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
0%

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 10.6% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
13.3%+2.7
n=15 · A/E 1.09 · £1 +0.10
New recruits · first run for the yard
33.3%+22.7
n=9 · A/E 2.81 · £1 +13.10
Debutants · first career start
10%−0.6
n=10 · A/E 3.19 · £1 +14.90
First-time headgear · true-first definition
33.3%+22.7
n=3 · A/E 9.03 · £1 +9.60
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
0%−10.6
n=4 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −4.00
When favourite
50%
n=2 · A/E 0.00 · £1 +0.50
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
17.6%+7.0
n=17 · A/E 2.40 · £1 +31.50
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
0%−10.6
n=7 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −7.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 10.6% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Race type

TypeRWSR£1
Flat 21 4 19% +30.00
Hurdle 14 1 7.1% −1.40
Chase 12 0 0% −12.00

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Soft 26 4 15.4% +12.70
Heavy 10 0 0% −10.00
Good 6 1 16.7% +18.90
Standard (AW) 5 0 0% −5.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Auteuil (FR) 23 1 4.3% −10.40
Chantilly (FR) 6 1 16.7% +18.90
Saint-Cloud (FR) 6 1 16.7% +1.00
Longchamp (FR) 5 1 20% +11.60
Compiegne (FR) 3 0 0% −3.00
Dieppe (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00
Deauville (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00
Angers 1 1 100% +1.50
Le Lion-D'Angers (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 1 7 0 0% −7.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 2 1 50% 0.00 +0.50
2nd–3rd fav 9 0 0% 0.00 −9.00
4th–6th fav 14 2 14.3% 1.94 +17.90
7th+ in betting 22 2 9.1% 2.73 +7.20
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Wagram (FR)from A Lamotte D'Argy · then Z Koplik 7 1 3 26 Mar 19
Totem (FR)from B Legros · then Y Fertillet 5 1 3 26 Mar 19
Pragelor (FR)from A Lamotte D'Argy · then Daniela Mele 3 0 0 9 Jun 19
Babbo Natale (FR)from A Lamotte D'Argy 3 0 0 6 May 19
Road Mix Tavel (FR)then Daniela Mele 3 0 1 16 Mar 19
Mrs Valentine (FR) 2 0 0 18 Jul 19
Ayepaddy (FR)from A Lamotte D'Argy · then Jerome Zuliani 2 0 0 9 Jun 19
Oui Madame (IRE)from A Lamotte D'Argy 2 0 0 24 May 19
Langannerie (FR) 2 0 0 6 May 19
Tiptop (FR)then Mlle Y Vollmer 2 1 1 5 Mar 19
Pique La Lune (FR) 2 0 0 14 Oct 18
All 19 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 19 horses listed, 9 arrived from another yard in our archive, most often from A Lamotte D'Argy (7); 10 had their first archived run for this yard.

11 have since run for another yard, most often for Daniela Mele (2); 8 have no later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

When the yard fires

strike by month, lifetime
JFMAMJJASOND
·0000500·029130
Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
RiderRWSR£1
Mlle Chloe Hue 16 3 18.8% +32.50
Adrien Merienne 9 0 0% −9.00
Benjamin Berenguer 8 0 0% −8.00
Antoine Auchere 3 0 0% −3.00
Ludovic Philipperon 2 0 0% −2.00
Vincent Cheminaud 2 0 0% −2.00
Clement Lefebvre 2 0 0% −2.00
Alexandre Roussel 1 0 0% −1.00
Jerome Cabre 1 1 100% +1.50
Felix De Giles 1 0 0% −1.00
Pierre-Charles Boudot 1 0 0% −1.00
Jordan Duchene 1 1 100% +11.60
Muted rows are under 30 rides.

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2018→
5
Archived wins
£205k
Prize money
2018
Best season · 5 wins
First America (FR) — Prix Beaumanoir (Hurdle) (Conditions) (4yo) (Turf) Auteuil (FR) · Jun 2018
£19,115
Totem (FR) — Prix Perplexite (Handicap) (3yo) (Turf) Saint-Cloud (FR) · Oct 2018
£12,389
Wagram (FR) — Prix du Vert Galant (Conditions) (3yo) (Turf) Longchamp (FR) · Jun 2018
£12,389

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Orpen (USA) 14.3% · 1–7
Progeny have won 9% of 4,038 runs since 2008 (381 horses). Weakest over 2m5f – 3m (all codes): 4.4% from 113.
Tiger Groom (GB) 0% · 0–7
Progeny have won 10.3% of 680 runs since 2008 (81 horses). Strongest on Good to Soft going: 13.9% from 122.
Al Namix (FR) 0% · 0–6
Progeny have won 11.7% of 2,206 runs since 2008 (293 horses).
Literato (FR) 20% · 1–5
Progeny have won 7.3% of 1,059 runs since 2008 (130 horses).
Hurricane Cat (USA) 0% · 0–3
Progeny have won 10.7% of 1,137 runs since 2008 (145 horses). Strongest on Heavy going: 15.3% from 124. Weakest on Standard (AW) going: 7.3% from 372. Strongest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 15.5% from 155. Weakest over 1m – 1m1f (all codes): 6.8% from 266.
Montmartre (FR) 33.3% · 1–3
Progeny have won 11.6% of 2,390 runs since 2008 (303 horses). Weakest on Standard (AW) going: 4.5% from 179. Strongest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 15.9% from 598. Weakest over 1m – 1m1f (all codes): 2.9% from 138.
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 29 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

all 47 archived runs · newest first

Every one of Hue & Lamotte D'Argy's 47 archived runners, from 29 April 2018 to 19 October 2019, newest first — 5 winners among them.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is Hue & Lamotte D'Argy's strike rate?
Hue & Lamotte D'Argy has won 5 of 47 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 10.6% (as at 29 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
What is Hue & Lamotte D'Argy's Fair A/E?
1.26, from 46 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 29 October 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).