Pierre-Charles Boudot
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Rides around 110 times a season, almost all on the flat, winning on 16% of them — level with the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 0.98). Riding last-time-out winners the record reads 22% (79 rides). The rider is quiet just now — 4 winners in the last fortnight, below their own baseline.
The record is strongest at Clairefontaine (FR) (25%, n=60), clear of the rider's 15.6% baseline. It is weakest at Chantilly (8.1% over 74 rides) — the widest gap in the record. Rides on last-time-out winners have been a positive signal at 21.5% (n=79, Fair A/E 1.12), but rides in big fields of 14 or more have been a poor signal at 9.7% (n=155, Fair A/E 0.94). Right now the rider is in a quiet spell: 4 from 48 rides in the last 14 days (8.3%, 7.3pts below the 15.6% baseline). A & L Fabre supplies 21% of the rides and matches the rider's average almost exactly (16.4%, A/E 0.81). The rider also reads well in Class 3 (20.9%, n=67). The record reads poorly in Class 2 — 5.8% over 52 rides, 9.8pts below the baseline. 237 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the rider has landed: the Qatar Prix de l'Arc de Triomphe at Longchamp (FR) (Oct 2019, £2,573,874). The standout partner of the record: Waldgeist (GB) — 9 wins from 17 rides together.
Riding patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 15.6% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 15.6% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. First rides are the first captured pairing of horse and rider; last-time-out winners are horses whose previous captured run was a win; claiming rides are runs where the rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerGoing
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses ridden
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Quiet spellBy month
strike by month, 5 seasonsRiding for
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2009→Sires of the horses ridden
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 7,471 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 7,471 archived rides, newest first. The full record runs from 17 May 2009 to 11 November 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is Pierre-Charles Boudot's strike rate?
- Pierre-Charles Boudot has won 87 of 558 rides since 2022, a strike rate of 15.6% (as at 13 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Pierre-Charles Boudot do best at?
- Clairefontaine (FR) by strike rate: 15 wins from 60 rides (25%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most rides on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Which yard does Pierre-Charles Boudot ride most for?
- A & L Fabre, with 116 rides since 2022 — 21% of the total. That pairing has won 19 (16.4%).
- Is Pierre-Charles Boudot in form?
- In the last 14 days: 48 rides, 4 winners, a strike rate of 8.3%. That is below the baseline of 15.6% since 2022.
- What is Pierre-Charles Boudot's Fair A/E?
- 0.98, from 555 rides with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.