Skip to content
Trainer profile

Joeri Goossens

103 runners in the last 5 seasons · 11 individual horses
As at 21 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner 14 days ago 100% of runners on the flat
from 1 Jan 2022
4–103
Wins / Runs
3.9%
Strike rate
n=103
21 (20%)
Placed
0.74
n=103 · 0.61 incl. margin
−51.50
£1 level stake
n=103 at SP · −50.0%
£125k
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
0%
KTB Yard Profile

Sends out around 20 runners a season, almost all on the flat, winning with 4% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 0.74).

Deterministic profile computed from 103 archived runs (last 5 seasons) · updated 21 Oct 2026
The read

The yard also reads well over 6f – 7f (7.9%, n=38). The record reads poorly over 1m – 1m1f — 0% over 37 runners, 3.9pts below the baseline. The market has consistently overbet the yard on Standard (AW) going: Fair A/E 0.37 across 55 runners (1.8% strike, −32.30 to a £1 stake) — runners there underperform what the price implies.

Written from the figures on this page — every claim carries its sample. Descriptive, not a tip.

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 3.9% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
2.6%−1.3
n=39 · A/E 0.55 · £1 −16.30
New recruits · first run for the yard
0%−3.9
n=9 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −9.00
First-time headgear · true-first definition
0%−3.9
n=4 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −4.00
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
0%−3.9
n=4 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −4.00
When favourite
0%
n=3 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −3.00
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
7.1%+3.2
n=14 · A/E 1.11 · £1 −4.80

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 3.9% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
Over 6f – 7f 7.9% vs 3.9% · n=38
Over 1m – 1m1f 0% vs 3.9% · n=37
With Aurelien Lemaitre 7.1% vs 3.9% · n=42
On Standard (AW) going 1.8% vs 3.9% · n=55
At Chantilly (FR) 3% vs 3.9% · n=67 · A/E 0.55
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Standard (AW) 55 1 1.8% −32.30
Good to Soft 20 2 10% −0.40
Soft 20 1 5% −10.80
Good 6 0 0% −6.00
Heavy 2 0 0% −2.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Chantilly (FR) 67 2 3% −35.10
Longchamp (FR) 14 1 7.1% −3.00
Saint-Cloud (FR) 9 0 0% −9.00
Deauville (FR) 8 1 12.5% +0.60
Compiegne (FR) 2 0 0% −2.00
Le Touquet (FR) 2 0 0% −2.00
Amiens (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 4 3 0 0% −3.00
Class 3 1 0 0% −1.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 3 0 0% 0.00 −3.00
2nd–3rd fav 10 0 0% 0.00 −10.00
4th–6th fav 23 3 13% 1.60 +5.80
7th+ in betting 67 1 1.5% 0.50 −44.30
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Baba Sim (FR)from Marian Falk Weissmeier 30 2 7 14 Apr 26
Mydavi (FR)from Marian Falk Weissmeier 16 1 3 7 Dec 24
Ivishak River (FR) 15 0 4 12 Oct 24
Inkiostro (FR)from Maurizio Guarnieri 4 0 0 7 Oct 26
Vincenco (FR)from K R Burke · then Buyl & De Clercq 3 0 0 9 Mar 22
Zifulott (FR)from Maurizio Guarnieri 2 0 1 13 Sep 26
Ganzeville (FR)from Maurizio Guarnieri 2 0 0 14 Apr 26
All 11 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 11 horses listed, 10 arrived from another yard in our archive, most often from Marian Falk Weissmeier (5) and Maurizio Guarnieri (4); 1 had its first archived run for this yard.

1 has since run for another yard; 10 have no later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

When the yard fires

strike by month, 5 seasons
JFMAMJJASOND
01300090146000
A flat yard: the season runs Mar–Oct. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
41% of all rides
7.1% SR · A/E 1.13
RiderRWSR£1
Aurelien Lemaitre 42 3 7.1% +0.30
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2017→
6
Archived wins
£169k
Prize money
2023
Best season · 2 wins
Baba Sim (FR) — Prix de la Federation des Eleveurs du Galop (Handicap) (3yo) (Straight Course) (Turf) Deauville (FR) · Aug 2022
£23,109
Mydavi (FR) — Prix de Jagny-Sous-Bois (Handicap) (5yo+) (All-Weather Track) (Polytrack) Chantilly (FR) · Feb 2023
£12,389
Miracle Ninetynine (IRE) — Prix Fantomas (Handicap) (4yo+) (Turf) Chantilly (FR) · May 2018
£11,504

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Dabirsim (FR) 5.9% · 2–34
Progeny have won 7.4% of 4,128 runs since 2008 (448 horses). Weakest on Heavy going: 3.9% from 254. Strongest at trips under 6f (all codes): 12% from 209. Weakest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 2.8% from 142.
Style Vendome (FR) 6.3% · 1–16
Progeny have won 7.2% of 1,230 runs since 2008 (150 horses).
Vif Monsieur (GER) 0% · 0–15
Progeny have won 4.9% of 61 runs since 2008 (17 horses).
Nathaniel (IRE) 8.3% · 1–12
Progeny have won 11.6% of 7,065 runs since 2008 (634 horses). Weakest over 6f – 7f (all codes): 6.2% from 324.
Kingman (GB) 0% · 0–10
Progeny have won 14.6% of 7,471 runs since 2008 (775 horses). Weakest on Soft going: 11.1% from 959. Weakest over 2m1f – 2m4f (all codes): 9.1% from 121.
Highland Reel (IRE) 0% · 0–5
Progeny have won 7.2% of 1,507 runs since 2008 (161 horses). Strongest on Good to Firm going: 10.4% from 144.
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 21 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 148 · newest first

The latest 50 of 148 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 7 March 2017 to 7 October 2026.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP
07 Oct 26 Chantilly (FR) Inkiostro (FR)J: D Santiago Prix Du Bois Laris9.5f · Standard · 16 ran 10th 40/1
16 Jul 26 Compiegne (FR) Ambra Antica (FR)J: Aurelien Lemaitre Prix De La Foret De RetzClass 3 · 7f · Good To Soft · 14 ran 13th 33/1

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is Joeri Goossens's strike rate?
Joeri Goossens has won 4 of 103 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 3.9% (as at 21 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does Joeri Goossens do best at?
Chantilly (FR) by strike rate: 2 wins from 67 runners (3%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
What is Joeri Goossens's Fair A/E?
0.74, from 103 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 21 October 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).