Skip to content
Trainer profile

W Hefter

202 runners in the lifetime window · 53 individual horses
As at 15 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner Jun 2015 100% of runners on the flat
No runners in the last 5 seasons — showing the lifetime record, from 1 Jan 2008 — the aggregate floor: every horse in the window has a complete captured career behind it.
19–202
Wins / Runs
9.4%
Strike rate
n=202
46 (23%)
Placed
0.98
Fair A/E
n=159 · 0.99 incl. margin
−39.40
£1 level stake
n=173 at SP · −22.8%
£452k
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
0%
KTB Yard Profile

Sent out around 30 runners a season, almost all on the flat, winning with 9% of them — level with the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 0.98).

Deterministic profile computed from 202 archived runs (lifetime window) · updated 15 Oct 2026
The read

It is weakest at Longchamp (FR) (4.9% over 41 runners) — the largest sample in the record, and the widest gap. In Group and Graded company the record reads poorly at 5.6% (n=36, Fair A/E 1.65). The record read poorly in Class 1 — 5.6% over 36 runners, 3.8pts below the baseline. The market has consistently overbet the yard on Soft going: Fair A/E 0.41 across 51 runners (5.9% strike, −34.00 to a £1 stake) — runners there underperformed what the price implied. 2 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Prix Andre Baboin - Musee Gallo-Romain de Saint-Romain-en-Gal at Lyon Parilly (FR) (Oct 2014, £33,333).

Written from the figures on this page — every claim carries its sample. Descriptive, not a tip.

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 9.4% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
6.6%−2.8
n=61 · A/E 1.00 · £1 −25.20
New recruits · first run for the yard
0%−9.4
n=4 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −4.00
Debutants · first career start
10.6%+1.2
n=47 · A/E 0.71 · £1 +0.00
First-time headgear · true-first definition
15.8%+6.4
n=19 · A/E 1.18 · £1 +6.60
When favourite
25%
n=8 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −2.00
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
10.5%+1.1
n=19 · A/E 1.60 · £1 −5.40
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
5.6%−3.8
n=36 · A/E 1.65 · £1 −4.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 9.4% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
At Longchamp (FR) 4.9% vs 9.4% · n=41
On Soft going 5.9% vs 9.4% · n=51
In Class 1 5.6% vs 9.4% · n=36
In Group / Graded races 5.6% vs 9.4% · n=36
At Saint-Cloud (FR) 5.7% vs 9.4% · n=35
On Good going 6.1% vs 9.4% · n=49
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Soft 51 3 5.9% −34.00
Good to Soft 50 6 12% −9.90
Good 49 3 6.1% −8.60
Standard (AW) 27 3 11.1% +18.50
Heavy 21 3 14.3% −4.40
Good to Firm 2 1 50% −1.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Longchamp (FR) 41 2 4.9% −19.30
Saint-Cloud (FR) 35 2 5.7% −27.40
Chantilly (FR) 27 2 7.4% −3.50
Maisons-Laffitte (FR) 25 1 4% −20.70
Deauville (FR) 21 2 9.5% +7.80
Lyon Parilly 11 3 27.3% +4.00
Strasbourg 9 0 0% −5.00
Vichy 8 1 12.5% +5.00
Vittel 5 3 60% +1.00
Nancy 4 1 25% −2.00
Compiegne 4 0 0% −3.00
Lyon-La Soie 2 1 50% +14.00
Wissembourg 2 0 0% —
Clairefontaine 2 1 50% +12.70
Moulins 1 0 0% —

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 1 36 2 5.6% −4.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 8 2 25% 0.00 −2.00
2nd–3rd fav 24 3 12.5% 0.85 +1.90
4th–6th fav 52 8 15.4% 1.86 +34.70
7th+ in betting 89 1 1.1% 0.32 −74.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Mantao (IRE)then J Van Handenhove 18 2 7 14 Nov 14
Ice Cool (FR)then M Boutin 15 4 6 19 Sep 13
Salvaro (FR) 12 1 2 16 Oct 13
Mariele (IRE)then U Schwinn 10 1 2 6 May 15
Tingly (FR) 9 0 1 8 Jun 13
Indian Cat (IRE) 9 1 2 6 Jul 12
Lapao (GER) 9 1 1 24 Oct 10
Mayflair (GER)then J-P Gallorini 7 1 2 23 Sep 11
Best Joking (GER) 7 0 1 25 Jun 10
Winning Impact (IRE)from J G Coogan 6 0 1 18 Dec 14
Glad Sky (GB)from J-L Pelletan 5 0 1 17 Apr 15
All 53 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 53 horses listed, 4 arrived from another yard in our archive; 49 had their first archived run for this yard.

19 have since run for another yard, most often for Mlle N Pfohl (2) and Mlle Y Vollmer (2); 34 have no later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

When the yard fires

strike by month, lifetime
JFMAMJJASOND
·10001304522711140
A flat yard: the season runs Mar–Oct. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
RiderRWSR£1
Dominique Boeuf 26 2 7.7% +4.80
Mickael Barzalona 17 2 11.8% +3.00
Maxime Guyon 16 1 6.3% −4.30
Johan Victoire 16 0 0% −11.00
Gerald Mosse 11 0 0% −10.00
Ioritz Mendizabal 9 1 11.1% −4.70
Theo Bachelot 9 0 0% −9.00
Umberto Rispoli 8 0 0% −8.00
Alexis Badel 7 1 14.3% +6.70
Marc Lerner 6 1 16.7% +2.00
Martin Seidl 5 1 20% +8.50
Jean-Michel Breux 4 2 50% −1.00
Muted rows are under 30 rides.

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2005→
19
Archived wins
2
Pattern / graded wins
£477k
Prize money
2014
Best season · 5 wins
In our archive from its very first year (2005), so this career almost certainly began earlier than our record does. The figures above count 2005 onwards only — what the archive holds, not a full-career total. This card is the full archive census (2005→); the statistics in the header aggregate from 2008 — the floor that guarantees every horse a complete captured career — so this card can legitimately show more wins than the header.
Dartagnan D'Azur (FR) — Prix Andre Baboin - Musee Gallo-Romain de Saint-Romain-en-Gal (3yo+) (Turf) Lyon Parilly (FR) · Oct 2014 · Group 3
£33,333
Dartagnan D'Azur (FR) — Prix de Boulogne () (4yo+) (Turf) Longchamp (FR) · Sep 2014 · Listed
£21,667
Ice Cool (FR) — Prix de Saint Nicolas d'Acy (Conditions) (3yo) (Turf) Chantilly (FR) · Oct 2012
£14,167

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Slickly (FR) 19% · 4–21
Progeny have won 8% of 3,070 runs since 2008 (318 horses). Strongest on Heavy going: 11% from 310. Weakest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 4.9% from 243.
King's Best (USA) 11.1% · 2–18
Progeny have won 9.9% of 7,763 runs since 2008 (574 horses). Weakest over 2m5f – 3m (all codes): 6.8% from 249.
Lateral (GB) 26.7% · 4–15
Progeny have won 8.7% of 115 runs since 2008 (10 horses).
Doyen (IRE) 7.7% · 1–13
Progeny have won 11.6% of 7,339 runs since 2008 (605 horses).
Big Shuffle (USA) 0% · 0–12
Progeny have won 9.1% of 1,088 runs since 2008 (134 horses).
Shirocco (GER) 10% · 1–10
Progeny have won 11.2% of 9,154 runs since 2008 (920 horses). Weakest over 6f – 7f (all codes): 7.4% from 203.
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 15 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 218 · newest first

The latest 50 of 218 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 16 June 2005 to 8 June 2015.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is W Hefter's strike rate?
W Hefter has won 19 of 202 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 9.4% (as at 15 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does W Hefter do best at?
Saint-Cloud (FR) by strike rate: 2 wins from 35 runners (5.7%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
What is W Hefter's Fair A/E?
0.98, from 159 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 15 October 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).