As at 15 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last ride Feb 2006100% of rides over jumps
Archive record 2005–2006
No rides from 1 Jan 2008, where our aggregate statistics normally begin — showing the full archive record instead, 6 Jan 2005 to 4 Feb 2006. Figures that need a horse's earlier runs (debuts, time since a run, first-time headgear, new connections, last-time-out winners) are left out: for runs this early our archive cannot see what came before.
22–240
Wins / Runs
9.2%
Strike rate
n=240
57 (24%)
Placed
1.17
Fair A/E
n=240 · 1.00 incl. margin
−80.42
£1 level stake
n=240 at SP · −33.5%
£170k
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
8.3%
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
KTB Rider Profile
Rode 240 times in our archive record (2005–2006), almost all over hurdles and fences, winning on 9% of them — beating the margin-free market read across that record (Fair A/E 1.17).
Deterministic profile computed from 240 archived runs (archive record 2005–2006) · updated 15 Oct 2026
KTB at a glancePhilip Hobbs: 12.9% from 62
The read
Philip Hobbs supplied 26% of the rides and edges the rider's average (12.9% vs 9.2%, A/E 1.17) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The rider also read well on Good to Firm going (12.8%, n=47) and in Class 3 (12.5%, n=64). The record read poorly on Good going — 4.3% over 70 rides, 4.9pts below the baseline.
Written from the figures on this page — every claim carries its sample. Descriptive, not a tip.
Riding patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 9.2% baseline
When favourite
33.3%
n=15 · A/E 1.25 · £1 +3.83
Claiming rides · riding with a claim
7.8%−1.4
n=218 · A/E 1.02 · £1 −101.92
Big fields · 14+ runners
6.9%−2.3
n=101 · A/E 1.22 · £1 −52.25
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
0%−9.2
n=7 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −7.00
Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 9.2% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Claiming rides are runs where the rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. Tiles that depend on a horse's earlier runs (debuts, time off, first-time headgear, new connections, last-time-out winners) are not shown on an archive-era record: for runs this early our archive cannot see what came before.
Notable angles
vs their own baseline
On Good going4.3% vs 9.2% · n=70
With Philip Hobbs12.9% vs 9.2% · n=62
On Good to Firm going12.8% vs 9.2% · n=47
In Class 312.5% vs 9.2% · n=64
Over 1m5f – 2m6.3% vs 9.2% · n=80
Over 2m5f – 3m11.9% vs 9.2% · n=67
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.
Record by conditions
same window as header
Race type
TypeRWSR£1
Hurdle155149%−46.50
Chase60711.7%−12.67
NH Flat2514%−21.25
Going
GoingRWSR£1
Good7034.3%−53.67
Good to Soft61711.5%−9.75
Good to Firm47612.8%+2.00
Soft4648.7%−12.00
Heavy13215.4%−4.00
Firm300%−3.00
Courses
CourseRWSR£1
Chepstow2114.8%−12.00
Worcester2114.8%−6.00
Wincanton21419%+9.08
Newton Abbot14214.3%−2.00
Fontwell14214.3%−4.50
Exeter1417.1%−10.00
Stratford1100%−11.00
Cheltenham1100%−11.00
Hereford11327.3%+23.50
Taunton10110%−5.50
Uttoxeter10110%−4.00
Newbury10220%+1.00
Towcester900%−9.00
Ludlow800%−8.00
Warwick7114.3%+4.00
Class
ClassRWSR£1
Class 4113119.7%−39.50
Class 364812.5%−7.67
Class 62314.3%−19.25
Class 517211.8%+9.00
Class 21500%−15.00
Class 1800%−8.00
Market position
In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite20630%1.21+3.83
2nd–3rd fav31825.8%1.61+8.75
4th–6th fav6246.5%0.79−22.00
7th+ in betting12743.1%1.04−71.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.
Distance
DistanceRWSR£1
1m5f – 2m8056.3%−43.25
2m1f – 2m4f70710%−13.50
2m5f – 3m67811.9%−7.50
Over 3m2229.1%−15.17
1m2f – 1m4f100%−1.00
By season
By seasonRWSR£1
2005216209.3%−66.42
20062428.3%−14.00
Handicaps
HandicapsRWSR£1
Handicaps164159.1%−55.17
Field size
Field sizeRWSR£1
14-16 runners64710.9%−15.25
11-13 runners6111.6%−50.00
8-10 runners52611.5%−0.67
17+ runners3700%−37.00
5-7 runners25832%+23.50
2-4 runners100%−1.00
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Chases and hurdles only — bumpers have no obstacles, so completion is not a question there. F fell · UR unseated rider · PU pulled up · BD brought down · Oth covers refusals, slip-ups, run-outs and the rare disqualification. Non-runners are excluded throughout. Rows under n=30 are shown faded. A descriptive record, not a tip.
The 60 most-raced of 146 horses ridden in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
By month
strike by month, 2005–2006
JFMAMJJASOND
910810910100020140
A jumps rider: the season runs Oct–Apr. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".
Career highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→
22
Archived wins
£170k
Prize money
2005
Best season · 20 wins
In our archive from its very first year (2005), so this career almost certainly began earlier than our record does. The figures above count 2005 onwards only — what the archive holds, not a full-career total. On this page the header statistics and this card both count from the archive floor (2005), so they agree.
Progeny have won 9.8% of 734 runs since 2005 (68 horses).
Le Moss (IRE)25% · 2–8
Progeny have won 8.6% of 105 runs since 2005 (16 horses).
Emperor Jones (USA)0% · 0–7
Progeny have won 5.9% of 763 runs since 2005 (63 horses). Strongest on Standard (AW) going: 8.9% from 191. Weakest on Soft going: 1.9% from 105. Strongest over 6f – 7f (all codes): 10.5% from 162.
Groom Dancer (USA)14.3% · 1–7
Progeny have won 7.8% of 2,528 runs since 2005 (186 horses). Weakest over 6f – 7f (all codes): 4.1% from 295.
Carefree Dancer (USA)16.7% · 1–6
Progeny have won 12.5% of 8 runs since 2005 (1 horse). A small sample.
Jurado (USA)33.3% · 2–6
Progeny have won 10.1% of 756 runs since 2005 (62 horses). Weakest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 7.1% from 140.
Top line: the rider's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2005, as at 15 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.
The record
latest 50 of 240 · newest first
The latest 50 of 240 archived rides, newest first. The full record runs from 6 January 2005 to 4 February 2006.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
What is Robert Stephens's strike rate?
Robert Stephens has won 22 of 240 rides between 2005 and 2006, a strike rate of 9.2% (as at 15 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive. Our archive begins in 2005, so anything earlier is not counted.
Which yard does Robert Stephens ride most for?
Philip Hobbs, with 62 rides between 2005 and 2006 — 26% of the total. That pairing has won 8 (12.9%).
What is Robert Stephens's Fair A/E?
1.17, from 240 rides with a computed fair probability between 2005 and 2006. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Robert Stephens·SR 9.2%·A/E 1.17
KTB
Cookies on Kickthebookies
We use essential cookies to run the site and remember your betslip. No advertising or tracking cookies, ever. By continuing to use this site, you agree. Cookie policy