Skip to content
Trainer profile

W Haustein

53 runners in the lifetime window · 25 individual horses
As at 12 Nov 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner 30 days ago 100% of runners on the flat
from 1 Jan 2008 — the aggregate floor: every horse in the window has a complete captured career behind it
4–53
Wins / Runs
7.5%
Strike rate
n=53
9 (17%)
Placed
1.46
n=53 · 1.21 incl. margin
−6.60
£1 level stake
n=53 at SP · −12.5%
£66,081
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
14.3%

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 7.5% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
5.9%−1.6
n=17 · A/E 1.38 · £1 +1.10
New recruits · first run for the yard
0%−7.5
n=3 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −3.00
Debutants · first career start
4.5%−3.0
n=22 · A/E 1.20 · £1 −14.00
First-time headgear · true-first definition
50%+42.5
n=2 · A/E 7.49 · £1 +16.10
When favourite
100%
n=1 · A/E 4.01 · £1 +2.30
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
0%−7.5
n=3 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −3.00
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
0%−7.5
n=6 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −6.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 7.5% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
With a new jockey booking 9.5% vs 7.5% · n=42
In Flat races 7.5% vs 7.5% · n=53 · A/E 1.46
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Good to Soft 19 3 15.8% +19.40
Standard (AW) 14 0 0% −14.00
Good 8 0 0% −8.00
Heavy 7 0 0% −7.00
Soft 5 1 20% +3.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Chantilly (FR) 12 1 8.3% +6.10
Deauville (FR) 12 0 0% −12.00
Longchamp (FR) 12 1 8.3% −8.70
Saint-Cloud (FR) 11 0 0% −11.00
Maisons-Laffitte (FR) 2 0 0% −2.00
Dieppe (FR) 1 1 100% +7.00
Strasbourg (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00
Compiegne (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00
Le Touquet (FR) 1 1 100% +16.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 1 6 0 0% −6.00
Class 3 3 0 0% −3.00
Class 2 1 0 0% −1.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 1 1 100% 4.01 +2.30
2nd–3rd fav 4 0 0% 0.00 −4.00
4th–6th fav 15 1 6.7% 1.03 −7.00
7th+ in betting 33 2 6.1% 2.15 +2.10
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Sun At Work (GER)then Bohumil Nedorostek 14 0 4 29 Sep 21
Lord Of Lightning (IRE) 4 0 1 13 Nov 18
Io Motivata (GER) 3 1 1 11 Aug 18
Pasha Al Gunay (USA) 2 0 0 13 Oct 26
Berkut Al Gunay (GER) 2 0 0 2 Nov 21
Subpoena (GER) 2 0 0 6 Mar 21
Moonlight Fairy (FR) 1 0 0 19 Sep 26
Bliss Coin (FR) 1 1 1 9 Sep 26
Franklin Al Gunay 1 0 0 9 Jul 26
Aramis Al Gunay 1 0 0 9 Jul 26
All 25 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 25 horses listed, 3 arrived from another yard in our archive; 22 had their first archived run for this yard.

4 have since run for another yard, most often for Bohumil Nedorostek (2); 21 have no later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

When the yard fires

strike by month, lifetime
JFMAMJJASOND
0000201714020000
A flat yard: the season runs Mar–Oct. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
RiderRWSR£1
Eddy Hardouin 8 0 0% −8.00
Ioritz Mendizabal 4 1 25% +14.10
Gokhan Kocakaya 4 0 0% −4.00
Olivier Peslier 3 0 0% −3.00
Hugo Besnier 3 0 0% −3.00
Maxime Guyon 3 1 33.3% +0.30
Thomas Trullier 3 0 0% −3.00
Andrea Ricupa 2 0 0% −2.00
Dorian Provost 2 0 0% −2.00
Frau Stefanie Koyuncu 2 0 0% −2.00
Andreas Helfenbein 2 0 0% −2.00
Antoine Hamelin 2 0 0% −2.00
Muted rows are under 30 rides.

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2013→
4
Archived wins
£66,081
Prize money
2022
Best season · 2 wins
Graf Manama (FR) — Prix d'Orcy (Handicap) (4yo+) (Grande Course) (Turf) Longchamp (FR) · Jun 2022
£8,403
Graf Manama (FR) — Prix de Cramoisy (Handicap) (4yo+) (Turf) Chantilly (FR) · May 2022
£7,983
Io Motivata (GER) — Prix Treve (Maiden) (3yo Fillies) (Turf) Le Touquet (FR) · Jul 2018
£6,195

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Areion (GER) 0% · 0–15
Progeny have won 10.6% of 1,319 runs since 2008 (177 horses). Weakest over 1m2f – 1m4f (all codes): 7.6% from 144.
Mastercraftsman (IRE) 40% · 2–5
Progeny have won 10.6% of 11,644 runs since 2013 (842 horses). Strongest over 2m5f – 3m (all codes): 13.7% from 329.
Camelot (GB) 0% · 0–4
Progeny have won 11.7% of 7,746 runs since 2017 (765 horses).
Monsun (GER) 0% · 0–4
Progeny have won 15.8% of 2,243 runs since 2008 (250 horses). Strongest over 1m – 1m1f (all codes): 19.6% from 276. Weakest over 2m5f – 3m (all codes): 9.3% from 150.
Hit It A Bomb (USA) 0% · 0–3
Progeny have won 10.3% of 39 runs since 2020 (4 horses).
Motivator (GB) 33.3% · 1–3
Progeny have won 12% of 5,598 runs since 2009 (515 horses). Strongest on Soft going: 15.9% from 1,091. Weakest on Standard (AW) going: 7.8% from 1,282. Strongest over 2m1f – 2m4f (all codes): 15.2% from 593. Weakest over 6f – 7f (all codes): 8.7% from 575.
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 12 Nov 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 53 · newest first

The latest 50 of 53 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 7 July 2013 to 13 October 2026.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is W Haustein's strike rate?
W Haustein has won 4 of 53 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 7.5% (as at 12 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
What is W Haustein's Fair A/E?
1.46, from 53 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 12 November 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).