Skip to content
Trainer profile

Craig O'Neill

44 runners in the last 5 seasons · 6 individual horses
As at 21 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner 9 days ago 98% of runners on the flat
from 1 Jan 2022
5–44
Wins / Runs
11.4%
Strike rate
n=44
9 (21%)
Placed
1.70
n=44 · 1.33 incl. margin
+22.88
£1 level stake
n=44 at SP · +52.0%
£38,960
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
0%
KTB at a glance Claiming riders: 16.1%

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 11.4% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
22.2%+10.8
n=9 · A/E 3.91 · £1 +19.50
New recruits · first run for the yard
0%−11.4
n=2 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −2.00
Debutants · first career start
0%−11.4
n=3 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −3.00
First-time headgear · true-first definition
0%−11.4
n=1 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −1.00
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
0%−11.4
n=2 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −2.00
When favourite
25%
n=4 · A/E 1.09 · £1 −1.62
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
16.1%+4.7
n=31 · A/E 2.05 · £1 +35.88

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 11.4% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
With claiming riders up 16.1% vs 11.4% · n=31
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Race type

TypeRWSR£1
Flat 43 5 11.6% +23.88
NH Flat 1 0 0% −1.00

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Good 17 1 5.9% +12.00
Standard (AW) 16 3 18.8% −1.12
Soft 4 0 0% −4.00
Good to Firm 3 1 33.3% +20.00
Good to Soft 3 0 0% −3.00
Heavy 1 0 0% −1.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Dundalk (AW) 16 3 18.8% −1.12
Cork 7 1 14.3% +22.00
Curragh 5 0 0% −5.00
Fairyhouse 3 0 0% −3.00
Gowran Park 3 0 0% −3.00
Limerick 3 1 33.3% +20.00
Roscommon 2 0 0% −2.00
Bellewstown 1 0 0% −1.00
Leopardstown 1 0 0% −1.00
Navan 1 0 0% −1.00
Punchestown 1 0 0% −1.00
Tipperary 1 0 0% −1.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 4 1 25% 1.09 −1.62
2nd–3rd fav 5 1 20% 1.95 +0.50
4th–6th fav 13 1 7.7% 1.08 −6.00
7th+ in betting 22 2 9.1% 3.49 +30.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Sondheim (IRE)from W T Farrell 16 3 7 5 Jul 24
Ard Ri Na Heireann (IRE) 4 0 0 12 Oct 26
Liffeydale Spirit (IRE) 2 0 0 25 May 24
Oneplusone (IRE)from Jack W Davison 2 0 0 28 Jul 23
El Valle (IRE)from Kevin Prendergast 2 0 0 1 Feb 23
All 6 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 6 horses listed, 3 arrived from another yard in our archive; 3 had their first archived run for this yard.

1 has since run for another yard; 5 have no later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

Current form

significance-gated

Last 14 days

Small sample
0 from 1
Only 1 runners in the last 14 days — too few to read against the baseline (gate: n≥15). The card states the sample and stays neutral.

When the yard fires

strike by month, 5 seasons
JFMAMJJASOND
3325000400000330
A flat yard: the season runs Mar–Oct. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
RiderRWSR£1
Neve Bennett 24 3 12.5% +33.50
Danny Sheehy 7 2 28.6% +2.38
Marc Monaghan 3 0 0% −3.00
Luke McAteer 3 0 0% −3.00
Chris Hayes 1 0 0% −1.00
Gary Halpin 1 0 0% −1.00
Siobhan Rutledge 1 0 0% −1.00
Cian Cullinan 1 0 0% −1.00
Jack Cleary 1 0 0% −1.00
Jessica O'Gorman 1 0 0% −1.00
Robert Whearty 1 0 0% −1.00
Muted rows are under 30 rides.

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2020→
5
Archived wins
£40,860
Prize money
2024
Best season · 3 wins
Sondheim (IRE) — Conference & Banqueting Facilities At Limerick Racecourse Handicap (47-65) Limerick · Jun 2024
£6,195
Sondheim (IRE) — Hot House Flowers Play July 8th Handicap (47-65) Cork · Jun 2022
£6,195
Sondheim (IRE) — View Restaurant At Dundalk Stadium Handicap (47-70) (Div 1) Dundalk (AW) · Nov 2022
£6,195

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Rajasinghe (IRE) 11.1% · 2–18
Progeny have won 12.8% of 760 runs since 2008 (60 horses). Strongest on Standard (AW) going: 15.9% from 327. Weakest on Good to Firm going: 9.3% from 140.
Born To Sea (IRE) 18.8% · 3–16
Progeny have won 9.1% of 4,275 runs since 2008 (310 horses). Strongest on Soft going: 12.1% from 963. Weakest on Standard (AW) going: 4.4% from 864. Weakest over 6f – 7f (all codes): 5.8% from 723.
Arizona (IRE) 0% · 0–4
Progeny have won 6.4% of 482 runs since 2008 (72 horses).
Al Wukair (IRE) 0% · 0–2
Progeny have won 7.5% of 1,080 runs since 2008 (160 horses). Strongest over 1m2f – 1m4f (all codes): 12.6% from 206.
Anodin (IRE) 0% · 0–2
Progeny have won 8.8% of 2,408 runs since 2008 (274 horses). Weakest over 2m1f – 2m4f (all codes): 3.4% from 116.
Teofilo (IRE) 0% · 0–2
Progeny have won 12.5% of 10,070 runs since 2008 (907 horses). Weakest over 2m1f – 2m4f (all codes): 7% from 625.
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 21 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 53 · newest first

The latest 50 of 53 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 14 August 2020 to 12 October 2026.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is Craig O'Neill's strike rate?
Craig O'Neill has won 5 of 44 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 11.4% (as at 21 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Is Craig O'Neill in form?
Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 1 runner, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
What is Craig O'Neill's Fair A/E?
1.70, from 44 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 21 October 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).