Chris Hayes
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Rides around 670 times a season, almost all on the flat, winning on 8% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 0.90). Riding last-time-out winners the record reads 13% (279 rides).
Rides on last-time-out winners have been a positive signal at 12.9% (n=279, Fair A/E 0.95). The market has consistently overbet rides in big fields of 14 or more: 5.9% strike, Fair A/E 0.84 and −671.69 to a £1 stake over 1,446 rides — those runners underperform what the price implies. D K Weld supplies 30% of the rides and edges the rider's average (11.9% vs 8.2%, A/E 0.91). The rider also reads well on Good to Firm going (13.9%, n=101). 119 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the rider has landed: the Comer Group International Irish St. Leger at Curragh (Sep 2019, £342,000). The standout partner of the record: Solo Performer (IRE) — 7 wins from 27 rides together.
Riding patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 8.2% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 8.2% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. First rides are the first captured pairing of horse and rider; last-time-out winners are horses whose previous captured run was a win; claiming rides are runs where the rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerGoing
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses ridden
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
SteadyBy month
strike by month, 5 seasonsRiding for
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→Sires of the horses ridden
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 13,115 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 13,115 archived rides, newest first. The full record runs from 20 March 2005 to 6 November 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
KTB’s figures
the forward record · since 5 Oct 2026KTB’s figures on this rider’s mounts since 5 Oct 2026: the KTB Selection in 6 runs (won 2) · top-rated on KTB Rating in 7 runs (won 3) · fastest on KTB Speed in 5 runs (won 1) · to 29 Oct 2026.
Each pick was a KTB figure’s choice before the off — the published KTB Selection, the top-rated horse on KTB Rating, the fastest on KTB Speed — settled against the result the next morning and never worked out again; “did not run” is counted apart. GB and Irish races only. A record of weeks so far: read it as a count, not a verdict.
Quick answers
- What is Chris Hayes's strike rate?
- Chris Hayes has won 271 of 3,325 rides since 2022, a strike rate of 8.2% (as at 9 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Chris Hayes do best at?
- Down Royal by strike rate: 10 wins from 76 rides (13.2%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most rides on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Which yard does Chris Hayes ride most for?
- D K Weld, with 989 rides since 2022 — 30% of the total. That pairing has won 118 (11.9%).
- Is Chris Hayes in form?
- In the last 14 days: 29 rides, 3 winners, a strike rate of 10.3%. That is in line with the baseline of 8.2% since 2022.
- What is Chris Hayes's Fair A/E?
- 0.90, from 3,321 rides with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.