Skip to content
Trainer profile

James Bennett

75 runners in the last 5 seasons · 6 individual horses
As at 23 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner 10 days ago 91% of runners on the flat
from 1 Jan 2022
2–75
Wins / Runs
2.7%
Strike rate
n=75
10 (13%)
Placed
0.53
n=75 · 0.45 incl. margin
−59.00
£1 level stake
n=75 at SP · −78.7%
£26,230
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
8.7%
KTB at a glance Claiming riders: 3.2%

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 2.7% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
0%−2.7
n=12 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −12.00
New recruits · first run for the yard
0%−2.7
n=2 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −2.00
First-time headgear · true-first definition
0%−2.7
n=1 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −1.00
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
0%−2.7
n=3 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −3.00
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
3.2%+0.5
n=63 · A/E 0.64 · £1 −47.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 2.7% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
On Standard (AW) going 0% vs 2.7% · n=36
Over 6f – 7f 1.9% vs 2.7% · n=52 · A/E 0.33
In Class 6 3.3% vs 2.7% · n=60 · A/E 0.59
With claiming riders up 3.2% vs 2.7% · n=63 · A/E 0.64
In Flat races 2.9% vs 2.7% · n=68 · A/E 0.54
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Race type

TypeRWSR£1
Flat 68 2 2.9% −52.00
Hurdle 4 0 0% −4.00
NH Flat 2 0 0% −2.00
Chase 1 0 0% −1.00

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Standard (AW) 36 0 0% −36.00
Good to Firm 17 1 5.9% −11.00
Good 12 1 8.3% −2.00
Good to Soft 7 0 0% −7.00
Soft 3 0 0% −3.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Wolverhampton (AW) 20 0 0% −20.00
Lingfield (AW) 10 0 0% −10.00
Lingfield 8 0 0% −8.00
Brighton 6 1 16.7% +0.00
Chepstow 6 0 0% −6.00
Kempton (AW) 5 0 0% −5.00
Windsor 3 0 0% −3.00
Ffos Las 3 0 0% −3.00
Bath 2 1 50% +8.00
Salisbury 2 0 0% −2.00
Uttoxeter 2 0 0% −2.00
Warwick 1 0 0% −1.00
Ludlow 1 0 0% −1.00
Leicester 1 0 0% −1.00
Huntingdon 1 0 0% −1.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 6 60 2 3.3% −44.00
Class 5 12 0 0% −12.00
Class 4 2 0 0% −2.00
Class 2 1 0 0% −1.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
2nd–3rd fav 9 1 11.1% 0.86 −3.00
4th–6th fav 21 1 4.8% 0.65 −11.00
7th+ in betting 45 0 0% 0.00 −45.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Gonzaga (GB) 33 0 4 8 Aug 24
Dark Sun (GB)from William Haggas 21 2 6 13 Sep 26
Pacific Prince (GB)from Hugo Palmer 13 0 0 13 Oct 26
The Last Melon (GB) 5 0 0 27 Mar 25
Parisian Princesse (GB) 2 0 0 23 Aug 22
Mood For Mischief (GB)from Ed Walker 1 0 0 5 Jan 22
All 6 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 6 horses listed, 3 arrived from another yard in our archive; 3 had their first archived run for this yard.

None of them has a later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

Current form

significance-gated

Last 14 days

Small sample
0 from 1
Only 1 runners in the last 14 days — too few to read against the baseline (gate: n≥15). The card states the sample and stays neutral.

When the yard fires

strike by month, 5 seasons
JFMAMJJASOND
00000110110000
A flat yard: the season runs Mar–Oct. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
Go-to riderLaura Coughlan
55% of all rides
2.4% SR · A/E 0.48
RiderRWSR£1
Laura Coughlan 41 1 2.4% −35.00
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2006→
10
Archived wins
£76,358
Prize money
2015
Best season · 4 wins
This card is the full archive census (2005→); the statistics in the header aggregate from 2008 — the floor that guarantees every horse a complete captured career — so this card can legitimately show more wins than the header.
Idol Deputy (FR) — Coral.co.uk Handicap Wolverhampton (AW) · Feb 2016 · Class 4
£5,175
Dark Sun (GB) — Pockets Townhouse Bath Handicap Bath · Jun 2026 · Class 6
£3,768
Dark Sun (GB) — Ian Carnaby Handicap Stakes Brighton · Aug 2026 · Class 6
£3,454

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Oasis Dream (GB) 0% · 0–33
Progeny have won 11.8% of 18,006 runs since 2008 (1,510 horses). Strongest on Firm going: 17.3% from 150. Weakest on Heavy going: 8.5% from 482. Weakest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 7.1% from 790.
Dark Angel (IRE) 9.5% · 2–21
Progeny have won 11.3% of 21,882 runs since 2008 (1,594 horses). Strongest on Firm going: 15% from 107.
Australia (GB) 0% · 0–13
Progeny have won 11.2% of 5,647 runs since 2008 (563 horses). Weakest over 2m5f – 3m (all codes): 6.5% from 108.
Sir Percy (GB) 0% · 0–5
Progeny have won 11.1% of 7,149 runs since 2008 (473 horses).
Schiaparelli (GER) 0% · 0–2
Progeny have won 12% of 1,827 runs since 2008 (203 horses).
Nathaniel (IRE) 0% · 0–1
Progeny have won 11.7% of 7,070 runs since 2008 (635 horses). Weakest over 6f – 7f (all codes): 6.5% from 325.
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 23 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 264 · newest first

The latest 50 of 264 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 19 November 2006 to 13 October 2026.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP
31 Aug 26 Chepstow Pacific Prince (GB)J: Laura Coughlan Runtech Ltd Handicap Stakes (Div I)Class 6 · 7f · Good To Soft · 11 ran 8th 100/1
24 Aug 26 Brighton Dark Sun (GB)J: Laura Coughlan Ian Carnaby Handicap StakesClass 6 · 6f · Good To Firm · 5 ran 1st 5/1
07 May 26 Windsor Dark Sun (GB)J: Laura Coughlan attheraces.com/marketmovers HandicapClass 6 · 6f · Good To Firm · 8 ran 4th 9/1
25 Apr 26 Leicester Dark Sun (GB)J: Laura Coughlan Alpacalypse Session IPA HandicapClass 6 · 6f · Good To Firm · 10 ran 7th 12/1

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is James Bennett's strike rate?
James Bennett has won 2 of 75 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 2.7% (as at 23 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Is James Bennett in form?
Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 1 runner, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
What is James Bennett's Fair A/E?
0.53, from 75 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 23 October 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).