Ed Walker
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 480 runners a season, almost all on the flat, winning with 14% of them — beating the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 1.07). With a claiming rider up the record reads 20% (189 runs). The yard is quiet just now — 4 winners in the last fortnight, below its own baseline.
The record is strongest at Nottingham (25.4%, n=67), clear of the yard's 14.2% baseline. Runners with a claiming rider up have been a positive signal at 20.1% (n=189, Fair A/E 1.44), but debutants struggle at 5.3% (n=283, Fair A/E 0.68). Horses returning fresh after 61+ days are the standout value angle: 14.2% strikes only just above baseline, but Fair A/E 1.15 and +30.43 to a £1 stake over 345 runners — a record the market has persistently underpriced. Right now the yard is in a quiet spell: 4 from 36 runners in the last 14 days (11.1%, 3.1pts below the 14.2% baseline). Kieran Shoemark rides 21% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (15.9%, A/E 1.11) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The yard also reads well on Heavy going (23.3%, n=73). 64 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Queen Anne Stakes at Ascot (Jun 2026, £453,680). The stable star of the record: Mountain Peak (GB) — 10 wins from 52 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires May–Jun.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 14.2% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 14.2% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Quiet spellWhen the yard fires
strike by month, 5 seasonsJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2010→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 5,670 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 5,670 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 27 November 2010 to 21 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is Ed Walker's strike rate?
- Ed Walker has won 342 of 2,404 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 14.2% (as at 22 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Ed Walker do best at?
- Newmarket by strike rate: 16 wins from 74 runners (21.6%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Ed Walker?
- Kieran Shoemark, with 497 runners since 2022 — 21% of the total. That pairing has won 79 (15.9%).
- Is Ed Walker in form?
- In the last 14 days: 36 runners, 4 winners, a strike rate of 11.1%. That is below the baseline of 14.2% since 2022.
- What is Ed Walker's Fair A/E?
- 1.07, from 2,386 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.