Skip to content
Trainer profile

Mme I Pacault

729 runners in the lifetime window · 151 individual horses
As at 10 Nov 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner 4 days ago 92% of runners over jumps
from 1 Jan 2008 — the aggregate floor: every horse in the window has a complete captured career behind it
112–729
Wins / Runs
15.4%
Strike rate
n=729
248 (34%)
Placed
1.28
n=622 · 1.22 incl. margin
+298.70
£1 level stake
n=664 at SP · +45.0%
£6.02m
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
10%
KTB Yard Profile

Sends out around 40 runners a season, almost all over hurdles and fences, winning with 15% of them — beating the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 1.28). The edge shows sharpest with horses returning fresh: 17% off breaks of two months or more (243 runs).

Deterministic profile computed from 729 archived runs (lifetime window) · updated 10 Nov 2026
KTB at a glance Fresh horses: 16.9% 39.4% when favourite Sebastien Leloup: 15.2% from 92 Sends off the favourite in 10% of races
The read

The record is strongest at Pau (28.3%, n=60), clear of the yard's 15.4% baseline. Runners with a claiming rider up have been a poor signal at 9.6% (n=94, Fair A/E 1.42). Horses returning fresh after 61+ days are the standout value angle: 16.9% strikes only just above baseline, but Fair A/E 1.58 and +256.00 to a £1 stake over 243 runners — a record the market has persistently underpriced. Sebastien Leloup rides 13% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (15.2%, A/E 1.23) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The yard also reads well over 1m2f – 1m4f (25%, n=36) and in Flat races (23.6%, n=55). 24 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Zeturf Grand Steeple-Chase de Paris at Auteuil (FR) (May 2019, £332,432). The stable star of the record: Toutancarmont (FR) — 10 wins from 27 runs for the yard.

Written from the figures on this page — every claim carries its sample. Descriptive, not a tip.

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 15.4% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
16.9%+1.5
n=243 · A/E 1.58 · £1 +256.00
New recruits · first run for the yard
18.2%+2.8
n=11 · A/E 1.67 · £1 −2.00
Debutants · first career start
11.1%−4.3
n=135 · A/E 1.00 · £1 −21.30
First-time headgear · true-first definition
11.8%−3.6
n=68 · A/E 1.89 · £1 +36.30
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
20%+4.6
n=10 · A/E 2.21 · £1 +43.70
When favourite
39.4%
n=71 · A/E 0.97 · £1 +18.30
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
9.6%−5.8
n=94 · A/E 1.42 · £1 +71.80
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
13.4%−2.0
n=149 · A/E 1.22 · £1 +66.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 15.4% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
With Jonathan Plouganou 46.2% vs 15.4% · n=39
At Pau 28.3% vs 15.4% · n=60
With horses switching code 24.3% vs 15.4% · n=185
On last-time-out winners 23.5% vs 15.4% · n=98
Over 1m2f – 1m4f 25% vs 15.4% · n=36
In Flat races 23.6% vs 15.4% · n=55
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Race type

TypeRWSR£1
Chase 386 62 16.1% +133.40
Hurdle 288 37 12.8% +155.30
Flat 55 13 23.6% +10.00

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Soft 430 66 15.3% +90.30
Heavy 250 35 14% +175.50
Good 22 3 13.6% +5.40
Good to Soft 16 3 18.8% +15.80
Standard (AW) 9 3 33.3% +1.20
Good to Firm 1 1 100% +8.10

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Auteuil (FR) 389 53 13.6% +110.60
Enghien (FR) 129 17 13.2% +60.20
Compiegne 71 7 9.9% +27.20
Pau 60 17 28.3% +50.60
Dieppe 13 4 30.8% +42.40
Fontainebleau 8 2 25% +3.70
Deauville (FR) 7 1 14.3% −6.00
Clairefontaine 6 1 16.7% −5.00
Longchamp (FR) 5 1 20% −2.60
Angers (FR) 4 1 25% −0.90
Moulins 4 1 25% −1.00
Le Lion-D'Angers 3 1 33.3% −2.00
Saint-Malo (FR) 2 0 0% −2.00
Argentan 2 0 0% −2.00
Mauron 2 0 0% —

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 1 149 20 13.4% +66.00
Class 2 4 0 0% −4.00
Class 3 2 0 0% −2.00
Class 4 1 0 0% −1.00
Class 5 1 1 100% +9.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 75 31 41.3% 1.09 +24.90
2nd–3rd fav 140 31 22.1% 1.24 +78.60
4th–6th fav 181 20 11% 1.44 +42.70
7th+ in betting 268 13 4.9% 1.52 +152.50
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Jumping record

completion over obstacles · same window as header
82.1% completed · 672 obstacle runners (chases & hurdles)
CodeRCompFURPUBDOth
Chase 385 84.7% 25 3 29 0 2
Hurdle 287 78.7% 13 0 45 0 3
Chases and hurdles only — bumpers have no obstacles, so completion is not a question there. F fell · UR unseated rider · PU pulled up · BD brought down · Oth covers refusals, slip-ups, run-outs and the rare disqualification. Non-runners are excluded throughout. Rows under n=30 are shown faded. A descriptive record, not a tip.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Carriacou (FR) 33 6 21 21 May 23
Amirande (FR) 29 3 5 1 Nov 18
Polipa (FR) 27 8 16 9 Apr 19
Toutancarmont (FR) 27 10 12 7 Feb 16
Surely Try (FR) 23 1 9 24 Sep 20
Si Tu Viens (FR) 18 8 10 2 Feb 14
Duo D'Enfer (FR)then Micky Hammond 17 4 6 13 Apr 23
Winneyev (FR) 17 2 8 28 Mar 21
Telenomie (FR)then P Ventena Alves 17 5 11 28 Dec 18
Alleu (FR) 16 0 3 24 Dec 21
Don Mirande (FR) 16 1 4 11 Apr 12
Tutti Bella (FR) 14 2 4 22 Oct 26
Showing the 60 most-raced of the 151 horses sent out in this window — each ran at least 3 times. Horses with fewer runs aren't listed; search finds any horse since 2005. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 60 horses listed, 1 arrived from another yard in our archive; 59 had their first archived run for this yard.

8 have since run for another yard, most often for Venetia Williams (2); 52 have no later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

Current form

significance-gated

Last 14 days

Small sample
1 from 5
Only 5 runners in the last 14 days — too few to read against the baseline (gate: n≥15). The card states the sample and stays neutral.

When the yard fires

strike by month, lifetime
JFMAMJJASOND
411614171413181411131425
A jumps yard: the season runs Oct–Apr. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
Go-to riderSebastien Leloup
13% of all rides
15.2% SR · A/E 1.23
RiderRWSR£1
Sebastien Leloup 92 14 15.2% +1.90
Stephane Paillard 82 10 12.2% +19.50
Thomas Beaurain 60 7 11.7% +30.10
Jonathan Plouganou 39 18 46.2% +23.10
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2005→
121
Archived wins
24
Pattern / graded wins
£6.70m
Prize money
2013
Best season · 13 wins
In our archive from its very first year (2005), so this career almost certainly began earlier than our record does. The figures above count 2005 onwards only — what the archive holds, not a full-career total. This card is the full archive census (2005→); the statistics in the header aggregate from 2008 — the floor that guarantees every horse a complete captured career — so this card can legitimately show more wins than the header.
Carriacou (FR) — Zeturf Grand Steeple-Chase de Paris (5yo+) (Turf) Auteuil (FR) · May 2019 · Grade 1
£332,432
Carriacou (FR) — Prix Maurice Gillois Grand Steeple-Chase des 4 ans - Le Parisien (Chase) (4yo) (Turf) Auteuil (FR) · Nov 2016 · Grade 1
£115,809
Jubilatoire (FR) — Prix des Drags (Chase) (5yo+) (Turf) Auteuil (FR) · Jun 2019 · Grade 2
£89,189

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Al Namix (FR) 11.6% · 16–138
Progeny have won 11.6% of 2,207 runs since 2008 (293 horses).
Goldneyev (USA) 11.6% · 10–86
Progeny have won 14% of 767 runs since 2008 (116 horses). Strongest on Heavy going: 18% from 183. Strongest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 19.5% from 118.
Califet (FR) 16.4% · 11–67
Progeny have won 11.8% of 3,806 runs since 2008 (399 horses).
Prince Kirk (FR) 5.9% · 2–34
Progeny have won 6.1% of 246 runs since 2009 (43 horses).
Astarabad (USA) 10.3% · 3–29
Progeny have won 13.2% of 1,601 runs since 2008 (162 horses). Strongest on Heavy going: 18.3% from 377.
Linda's Lad (GB) 13.8% · 4–29
Progeny have won 8.2% of 1,323 runs since 2012 (186 horses). Strongest over 2m5f – 3m (all codes): 11.6% from 215.
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 10 Nov 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 765 · newest first

The latest 50 of 765 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 20 March 2005 to 6 November 2026.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP
06 Nov 26 Fontainebleau (FR) Coeur D'acier (FR)J: Thomas Journiac Prix Du DebucherClass 3 · 19f · Soft · 9 ran 3rd 6/1
26 Sep 26 Auteuil (FR) Lehahiah (FR)J: Kevin Nabet Prix Pierre Et Bernard CypresClass 2 · 18f · Very Soft · 12 ran PU 25/1
22 Sep 26 Auteuil (FR) Joie Interieure (FR)J: Kevin Nabet Prix Calabrais18f · Very Soft · 16 ran 13th 16/1
09 Sep 26 Compiegne (FR) Joie Interieure (FR)J: Kevin Nabet Prix De RanvilleClass 2 · 18f · Heavy · 9 ran 5th 20/1
18 Jul 26 Dieppe (FR) Carthaginois (FR)J: Christopher Grosbois Prix MontavalClass 2 · 12f · Soft · 7 ran 7th 66/1

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is Mme I Pacault's strike rate?
Mme I Pacault has won 112 of 729 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 15.4% (as at 10 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does Mme I Pacault do best at?
Pau by strike rate: 17 wins from 60 runners (28.3%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
Who rides most for Mme I Pacault?
Sebastien Leloup, with 92 runners since 2008 — 13% of the total. That pairing has won 14 (15.2%).
Is Mme I Pacault in form?
Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 5 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
What is Mme I Pacault's Fair A/E?
1.28, from 622 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 10 November 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).