Skip to content
Trainer profile

Nathan Vergne

35 runners in the last 5 seasons · 21 individual horses
As at 20 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner yesterday 100% of runners over jumps
from 1 Jan 2022
5–35
Wins / Runs
14.3%
Strike rate
n=35
13 (37%)
Placed
1.64
n=35 · 1.32 incl. margin
+11.90
£1 level stake
n=35 at SP · +34.0%
£178k
Prize money (window)

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 14.3% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
8.3%−6.0
n=12 · A/E 1.01 · £1 −7.10
New recruits · first run for the yard
11.1%−3.2
n=9 · A/E 1.21 · £1 −4.10
Debutants · first career start
16.7%+2.4
n=12 · A/E 1.58 · £1 +10.00
First-time headgear · true-first definition
22.2%+7.9
n=9 · A/E 1.68 · £1 +13.00
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
0%−14.3
n=1 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −1.00
When favourite
0%
n=2 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −2.00
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
20%+5.7
n=5 · A/E 3.45 · £1 +3.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 14.3% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
In Hurdle races 10% vs 14.3% · n=30
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Race type

TypeRWSR£1
Hurdle 30 3 10% +0.00
Chase 5 2 40% +11.90

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Soft 16 1 6.3% −8.00
Heavy 15 3 20% +10.90
Good 2 0 0% −2.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Auteuil (FR) 13 1 7.7% −1.00
Compiegne (FR) 9 1 11.1% −4.10
Clairefontaine (FR) 6 1 16.7% +2.00
La Teste De Buch (FR) 2 0 0% −2.00
Bordeaux Le Bouscat (FR) 2 1 50% +7.00
Nancy (FR) 1 1 100% +12.00
Fontainebleau (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00
Chateaubriant (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 1 6 1 16.7% +2.00
Class 2 2 0 0% −2.00
Class 4 2 0 0% −2.00
Class 5 2 1 50% +11.00
Class 3 1 0 0% −1.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 2 0 0% 0.00 −2.00
2nd–3rd fav 7 3 42.9% 3.58 +18.90
4th–6th fav 11 2 18.2% 2.05 +10.00
7th+ in betting 15 0 0% 0.00 −15.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Jumping record

completion over obstacles · same window as header
91.4% completed · 35 obstacle runners (chases & hurdles)
CodeRCompFURPUBDOth
Chase 5 80% 1 0 0 0 0
Hurdle 30 93.3% 1 0 0 0 1
Chases and hurdles only — bumpers have no obstacles, so completion is not a question there. F fell · UR unseated rider · PU pulled up · BD brought down · Oth covers refusals, slip-ups, run-outs and the rare disqualification. Non-runners are excluded throughout. Rows under n=30 are shown faded. A descriptive record, not a tip.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Asta La Pasta (IRE)from Dan Skelton 4 1 2 8 Sep 26
Serial Winner (FR) 3 0 0 6 Oct 26
Credo (FR) 3 0 2 30 Sep 26
Art De Rue (GB) 2 0 0 26 Sep 26
Casa Del Poeta (IRE) 2 0 1 26 Aug 26
Casa Del Poeta 2 0 1 26 Aug 26
Creatrice De Vie (IRE) 2 0 0 25 Apr 26
Fauda (FR)from Francois Nicolle 2 1 1 28 Mar 26
Dame Imperiale (IRE) 1 0 0 11 Oct 26
All 21 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 21 horses listed, 9 arrived from another yard in our archive, most often from Francois Nicolle (3); 12 had their first archived run for this yard.

1 has since run for another yard; 20 have no later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

Current form

significance-gated

Last 14 days

Small sample
2 from 5
Only 5 runners in the last 14 days — too few to read against the baseline (gate: n≥15). The card states the sample and stays neutral.

When the yard fires

strike by month, 5 seasons
JFMAMJJASOND
·025017·025033··
A jumps yard: the season runs Oct–Apr. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
RiderRWSR£1
Anthony Renard 16 3 18.8% +5.90
Leo-Paul Brechet 4 0 0% −4.00
J Bryan 4 0 0% −4.00
Gauvain Faivre-Picon 3 1 33.3% +10.00
Joshua Bryan 2 0 0% −2.00
Lucas Zuliani 2 0 0% −2.00
Ludovic Philipperon 1 0 0% −1.00
Kevin Nabet 1 0 0% −1.00
Angelo Zuliani 1 0 0% −1.00
Mr H C Swan 1 1 100% +11.00
Muted rows are under 30 rides.

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2026→
5
Archived wins
1
Pattern / graded wins
£178k
Prize money
2026
Best season · 5 wins
Asta La Pasta (IRE) — Prix Des Enfoires (Gde Course De Haies - Prix Guillaume D'ornano) Clairefontaine (FR) · Aug 2026 · Listed
£39,150
Fauda (FR) — Prix Colonel de la Horie - Chall. de l'Obst. Equinaxy (Handicap Chase) (Turf) Auteuil (FR) · Mar 2026
£23,870
Invino Honnetete (FR) — Prix Maurice Calve Bordeaux Le Bouscat (FR) · Oct 2026
£11,040

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Walk In The Park (IRE) 16.7% · 1–6
Progeny have won 13.2% of 6,929 runs since 2008 (688 horses).
Doctor Dino (FR) 0% · 0–4
Progeny have won 15.9% of 3,176 runs since 2008 (488 horses). Strongest on Good going: 19.7% from 553. Weakest on Standard (AW) going: 9.5% from 211. Strongest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 19.7% from 689. Weakest over 1m – 1m1f (all codes): 8.8% from 137.
Poet's Word (IRE) 0% · 0–4
Progeny have won 9.9% of 698 runs since 2008 (132 horses). Strongest on Standard (AW) going: 14.2% from 106.
Blue Bresil (FR) 33.3% · 1–3
Progeny have won 12.1% of 3,489 runs since 2008 (454 horses).
Progeny have won 16.2% of 407 runs since 2008 (114 horses). Strongest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 23.1% from 108.
Ardad (IRE) 0% · 0–2
Progeny have won 8.7% of 3,502 runs since 2008 (350 horses).
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 20 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

all 35 archived runs · newest first

Every one of Nathan Vergne's 35 archived runners, from 23 February 2026 to 19 October 2026, newest first — 5 winners among them.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP
12 Sep 26 Auteuil (FR) Credo (FR)J: Gauvain Faivre-Picon Prix KerymClass 2 · 17.5f · Heavy · 11 ran 7th 25/1
09 Sep 26 Compiegne (FR) Serial Winner (FR)J: Kevin Nabet Prix NuageClass 5 · 18f · Heavy · 15 ran 11th 14/1

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is Nathan Vergne's strike rate?
Nathan Vergne has won 5 of 35 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 14.3% (as at 20 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Is Nathan Vergne in form?
Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 5 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
What is Nathan Vergne's Fair A/E?
1.64, from 35 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 20 October 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).