Pat Cosgrave
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Rides around 290 times a season, almost all on the flat, winning on 12% of them — level with the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 0.99). Riding last-time-out winners the record reads 15% (156 rides).
The record is strongest at Bath (27.5%, n=51) and Yarmouth (22.9%, n=48) — all clear of the rider's 11.6% baseline. It is weakest at Newmarket (2.7% over 37 rides) — the widest gap in the record. Rides on last-time-out winners have been a positive signal at 14.7% (n=156, Fair A/E 0.75), but rides in big fields of 14 or more have been a poor signal at 4.4% (n=113, Fair A/E 0.83). Jim Boyle supplies 16% of the rides and sits below the rider's average (8.7% vs 11.6%, A/E 0.76). The rider also reads well off a 0-7-day break (22.8%, n=79). 31 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the rider has landed: the Golden Jubilee Stakes at Ascot (Jun 2011, £227,080). The standout partner of the record: Markab (GB) — 7 wins from 20 rides together. Seasonally, the rider fires Dec–Jan.
Riding patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 11.6% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 11.6% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. First rides are the first captured pairing of horse and rider; last-time-out winners are horses whose previous captured run was a win; claiming rides are runs where the rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerGoing
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses ridden
same window as header · most-raced firstBy month
strike by month, 5 seasonsRiding for
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→Sires of the horses ridden
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 9,387 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 9,387 archived rides, newest first. The full record runs from 2 January 2005 to 15 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
KTB’s figures
the forward record · since 5 Oct 2026KTB’s figures on this rider’s mounts since 9 Oct 2026: top-rated on KTB Rating in 1 run (won 0) · fastest on KTB Speed in 1 run (won 0) · to 9 Oct 2026.
Each pick was a KTB figure’s choice before the off — the published KTB Selection, the top-rated horse on KTB Rating, the fastest on KTB Speed — settled against the result the next morning and never worked out again; “did not run” is counted apart. GB and Irish races only. A record of weeks so far: read it as a count, not a verdict.
Quick answers
- What is Pat Cosgrave's strike rate?
- Pat Cosgrave has won 168 of 1,446 rides since 2022, a strike rate of 11.6% (as at 11 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Pat Cosgrave do best at?
- Bath by strike rate: 14 wins from 51 rides (27.5%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most rides on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Which yard does Pat Cosgrave ride most for?
- Jim Boyle, with 231 rides since 2022 — 16% of the total. That pairing has won 20 (8.7%).
- What is Pat Cosgrave's Fair A/E?
- 0.99, from 1,431 rides with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.