Skip to content
Trainer profile

Brian Beaunez

161 runners in the last 5 seasons · 21 individual horses
As at 21 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner 2 days ago
from 1 Jan 2022
12–161
Wins / Runs
7.5%
Strike rate
n=161
35 (22%)
Placed
1.23
n=160 · 1.02 incl. margin
−62.60
£1 level stake
n=160 at SP · −39.1%
£226k
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
0%
KTB Yard Profile

Sends out around 30 runners a season, winning with 8% of them — beating the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 1.23).

Deterministic profile computed from 161 archived runs (last 5 seasons) · updated 21 Oct 2026
The read

The record is strongest at Deauville (FR) (12.7%, n=55), clear of the yard's 7.5% baseline. It is weakest at Chantilly (FR) (4.3% over 47 runners) — the widest gap in the record. Runners with a claiming rider up have been a poor signal at 4.5% (n=44, Fair A/E 0.89). The yard also reads well over 6f – 7f (14.7%, n=34) and over 1m2f – 1m4f (14%, n=43). The record reads poorly on Soft going — 0% over 30 runners, 7.5pts below the baseline. The market has consistently overbet the yard over 1m – 1m1f: Fair A/E 0.37 across 51 runners (2% strike, −45.10 to a £1 stake) — runners there underperform what the price implies.

Written from the figures on this page — every claim carries its sample. Descriptive, not a tip.

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 7.5% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
3.6%−3.9
n=28 · A/E 0.87 · £1 −10.90
New recruits · first run for the yard
0%−7.5
n=12 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −12.00
Debutants · first career start
12.5%+5.0
n=8 · A/E 2.41 · £1 −4.80
First-time headgear · true-first definition
11.1%+3.6
n=9 · A/E 1.94 · £1 −5.80
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
0%−7.5
n=6 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −6.00
When favourite
75%
n=4 · A/E 2.92 · £1 +5.80
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
4.5%−3.0
n=44 · A/E 0.89 · £1 −27.00
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
0%−7.5
n=5 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −5.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 7.5% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
On Soft going 0% vs 7.5% · n=30
Over 6f – 7f 14.7% vs 7.5% · n=34
Over 1m2f – 1m4f 14% vs 7.5% · n=43
Over 1m – 1m1f 2% vs 7.5% · n=51
At Deauville (FR) 12.7% vs 7.5% · n=55
At Chantilly (FR) 4.3% vs 7.5% · n=47
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Race type

TypeRWSR£1
Flat 135 12 8.9% −36.60
Hurdle 21 0 0% −21.00
Chase 5 0 0% −5.00

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Standard (AW) 99 9 9.1% −32.00
Soft 30 0 0% −30.00
Good to Soft 18 2 11.1% +10.20
Heavy 14 1 7.1% −10.80

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Deauville (FR) 55 7 12.7% +2.70
Chantilly (FR) 47 2 4.3% −37.70
Saint-Cloud (FR) 20 2 10% −4.80
Auteuil (FR) 13 0 0% −13.00
Compiegne (FR) 11 0 0% −11.00
Longchamp (FR) 10 1 10% +6.20
Dieppe (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00
Cholet (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00
Strasbourg (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00
Fontainebleau (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00
Clairefontaine (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 1 5 0 0% −5.00
Class 4 1 0 0% −1.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 4 3 75% 2.92 +5.80
2nd–3rd fav 16 4 25% 1.67 +3.60
4th–6th fav 32 1 3.1% 0.38 −21.90
7th+ in betting 108 4 3.7% 1.07 −50.10
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Lord Monchablon (GB) 38 4 10 1 Feb 25
Kundrie (IRE)from H-A Pantall 21 4 8 25 Jan 24
Inside Montlioux (FR) 18 0 3 6 Apr 26
Bejar (FR)then Tim Donworth 13 1 4 1 Sep 25
Flory Du Ninian (FR) 12 2 2 26 Sep 25
Mister Mario (FR)from Mme G Rarick 10 0 1 12 Jan 24
Remama (FR)from Salih Plavac · then Mme Y Vollmer 9 1 3 9 Dec 25
Dayal (FR) 9 0 2 3 Oct 25
Jurmala (IRE)from H-A Pantall 5 0 1 14 Oct 26
Kup Davis (FR) 5 0 0 1 Mar 24
Imenhotep (FR)from J Bertran De Balanda 3 0 0 12 Jun 25
Roxy Music (FR)from F Monnier 3 0 0 9 Nov 24
All 21 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 21 horses listed, 11 arrived from another yard in our archive, most often from H-A Pantall (2); 10 had their first archived run for this yard.

5 have since run for another yard; 16 have no later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

Current form

significance-gated

Last 14 days

Small sample
0 from 2
Only 2 runners in the last 14 days — too few to read against the baseline (gate: n≥15). The card states the sample and stays neutral.

When the yard fires

strike by month, 5 seasons
JFMAMJJASOND
1100158001405198
A flat yard: the season runs Mar–Oct. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
RiderRWSR£1
Thomas Trullier 24 4 16.7% +7.70
Tony Piccone 20 0 0% −20.00
Mickael Barzalona 10 3 30% +15.20
Anthony Crastus 8 1 12.5% −4.60
Mlle Alison Massin 6 0 0% −6.00
Mme Frida Valle Skar 6 0 0% −6.00
Mme Marie Velon 5 0 0% −5.00
Malone Favriaux 5 1 20% −0.60
Mlle Ambre Molins 4 1 25% +8.60
Fabrice Veron 4 0 0% −4.00
Alexis Pouchin 4 1 25% +0.90
Theo Bachelot 4 0 0% −4.00
Muted rows are under 30 rides.

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2019→
20
Archived wins
£428k
Prize money
2023
Best season · 4 wins
Inside Montlioux (FR) — Prix Daniel Lescalle (Hurdle) (Handicap) (4yo) (Turf) Auteuil (FR) · Jun 2021
£40,179
Gaur D'Emra (FR) — Prix Sans Souci II (Handicap) (3yo) (Straight Course) (Turf) Deauville (FR) · Jul 2019
£12,613
L'Illi Pika (FR) — Prix de Ver-Sur-Mer (Handicap) (4yo+) (All-Weather Track) (Polytrack) Deauville (FR) · Dec 2019
£11,712

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Dutch Art (GB) 10.5% · 4–38
Progeny have won 12.1% of 8,107 runs since 2008 (600 horses). Strongest at trips under 6f (all codes): 18.1% from 700. Weakest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 9% from 365.
Free Eagle (IRE) 19% · 4–21
Progeny have won 10.6% of 2,399 runs since 2008 (189 horses). Weakest on Heavy going: 6.2% from 130.
Tiberius Caesar (FR) 0% · 0–18
Progeny have won 10.4% of 154 runs since 2008 (17 horses).
Recoletos (FR) 7.7% · 1–13
Progeny have won 9.1% of 793 runs since 2008 (113 horses).
Stormy Ocean (FR) 16.7% · 2–12
Progeny have won 17.5% of 57 runs since 2008 (5 horses).
Kheleyf (USA) 0% · 0–10
Progeny have won 8.7% of 10,542 runs since 2008 (676 horses). Strongest on Firm going: 12.2% from 131. Weakest over 1m2f – 1m4f (all codes): 5.6% from 880.
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 21 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 277 · newest first

The latest 50 of 277 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 2 April 2019 to 19 October 2026.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP
19 Oct 26 Compiegne (FR) Choeur D'enocq (FR)J: Thomas Beaurain Prix De Saint-raphael17f · Heavy · 12 ran 8th 16/1
04 Oct 26 Strasbourg (FR) Jurmala (IRE)J: Thomas Trullier Prix Du DaboClass 4 · 10f · Heavy · 15 ran 2nd 18/1

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is Brian Beaunez's strike rate?
Brian Beaunez has won 12 of 161 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 7.5% (as at 21 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does Brian Beaunez do best at?
Deauville (FR) by strike rate: 7 wins from 55 runners (12.7%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
Is Brian Beaunez in form?
Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 2 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
What is Brian Beaunez's Fair A/E?
1.23, from 160 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 21 October 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).