Skip to content
Trainer profile

C Scandella

481 runners in the lifetime window · 151 individual horses
As at 15 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner Oct 2019
No runners in the last 5 seasons — showing the lifetime record, from 1 Jan 2008 — the aggregate floor: every horse in the window has a complete captured career behind it.
45–481
Wins / Runs
9.4%
Strike rate
n=481
114 (24%)
Placed
1.01
Fair A/E
n=429 · 0.88 incl. margin
−75.10
£1 level stake
n=459 at SP · −16.4%
£2.03m
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
0%
KTB Yard Profile

Sent out around 40 runners a season, across both codes, winning with 9% of them — level with the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 1.01). Debutants are a strength: 15% on first career starts (86 runs).

Deterministic profile computed from 481 archived runs (lifetime window) · updated 15 Oct 2026
KTB at a glance Fired Sep–Oct Fresh horses: 9.5% Ervan Chazelle: 10.1% from 159 New recruits: 10%
The read

Debutants strike at 15.1% (n=86, Fair A/E 1.49), but in Group and Graded company the record reads poorly at 3.1% (n=129, Fair A/E 0.49). Ervan Chazelle rode 33% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (10.1%, A/E 1.37) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The record read poorly on Standard (AW) going — 2% over 51 runners, 7.4pts below the baseline. The market has consistently overbet the yard off a 15-30-day break: Fair A/E 0.30 across 117 runners (3.4% strike, −73.80 to a £1 stake) — runners there underperformed what the price implied. 5 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Prix Jacques d'Indy at Auteuil (FR) (Mar 2007, £39,527). The stable star of the record was Le Chateau (FR) — 5 wins from 36 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fired Sep–Oct.

Written from the figures on this page — every claim carries its sample. Descriptive, not a tip.

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 9.4% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
9.5%+0.1
n=179 · A/E 1.24 · £1 −3.00
New recruits · first run for the yard
10%+0.6
n=60 · A/E 1.39 · £1 −17.00
Debutants · first career start
15.1%+5.7
n=86 · A/E 1.49 · £1 +28.20
First-time headgear · true-first definition
8.6%−0.8
n=35 · A/E 0.64 · £1 −3.30
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
16.7%+7.3
n=6 · A/E 1.81 · £1 −1.10
When favourite
25.9%
n=27 · A/E 0.95 · £1 −7.20
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
6.9%−2.5
n=29 · A/E 0.95 · £1 −5.00
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
3.1%−6.3
n=129 · A/E 0.49 · £1 −83.60

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 9.4% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
In Class 1 3.1% vs 9.4% · n=129
In Group / Graded races 3.1% vs 9.4% · n=129
On Standard (AW) going 2% vs 9.4% · n=51
Off a 15-30-day break 3.4% vs 9.4% · n=117
With debutants 15.1% vs 9.4% · n=86
Over 6f – 7f 2.6% vs 9.4% · n=39
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Race type

TypeRWSR£1
Hurdle 254 28 11% +38.50
Flat 183 14 7.7% −99.20
Chase 44 3 6.8% −14.40

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Soft 250 29 11.6% +18.70
Heavy 107 8 7.5% −25.40
Standard (AW) 51 1 2% −44.10
Good 46 4 8.7% −16.70
Good to Soft 25 3 12% −6.60

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Auteuil (FR) 165 16 9.7% −23.80
Enghien (FR) 96 8 8.3% +28.90
Deauville (FR) 37 1 2.7% −30.10
Longchamp (FR) 32 4 12.5% −12.20
Saint-Cloud (FR) 32 3 9.4% −9.70
Chantilly (FR) 26 1 3.8% −24.10
Cagnes-Sur-Mer 18 0 0% −16.00
Marseille Borely 14 1 7.1% −9.60
Compiegne 14 2 14.3% +16.50
Maisons-Laffitte (FR) 14 1 7.1% −0.30
Vichy 7 0 0% −7.00
Lyon Parilly 6 3 50% +11.50
Clairefontaine 6 2 33.3% +3.40
Pau 4 1 25% −1.30
Marseille Pont-de-Vivaux 2 0 0% −2.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 1 129 4 3.1% −83.60

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 27 7 25.9% 0.95 −7.20
2nd–3rd fav 97 13 13.4% 0.80 −18.50
4th–6th fav 140 14 10% 1.26 +5.50
7th+ in betting 195 7 3.6% 1.05 −54.90
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Le Chateau (FR)then R Le Dren Doleuze 36 5 9 19 May 19
L'Espiguette (FR)then P Lenogue 18 2 5 27 Nov 16
Daliacelte (FR) 16 1 5 29 Sep 15
Rasique (FR)from F-M Cottin · then F-M Cottin 13 2 6 22 Nov 15
Be A Flirt (IRE)from J E Hammond 11 2 4 29 May 16
Shanawest (FR)then N Caullery 11 0 2 11 Apr 16
Flapjack (FR) 10 0 2 12 Nov 17
Piment Rouge (FR) 10 3 3 10 Sep 15
Becqualink (FR)from M Gentile 9 1 3 31 Oct 13
Heart Angel (FR) 8 0 0 17 Aug 17
Du Pyla (FR)then Z Koplik 8 2 5 3 Nov 16
Hidden (GB)from F-M Cottin 8 1 2 16 Sep 16
The 60 most-raced of 151 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 60 horses listed, 22 arrived from another yard in our archive, most often from F-M Cottin (7) and M Boutin (2); 38 had their first archived run for this yard.

20 have since run for another yard, most often for F-M Cottin (6) and P Lenogue (2); 40 have no later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

When the yard fires

strike by month, lifetime
JFMAMJJASOND
14171386863131180
Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
Go-to riderErvan Chazelle
33% of all rides
10.1% SR · A/E 1.37
RiderRWSR£1
Ervan Chazelle 159 16 10.1% +24.90
Anthony Lecordier 42 3 7.1% −19.50
Maxime Guyon 32 5 15.6% −11.30
Alexis Badel 32 2 6.3% −16.00
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2005→
55
Archived wins
5
Pattern / graded wins
£2.34m
Prize money
2014
Best season · 15 wins
In our archive from its very first year (2005), so this career almost certainly began earlier than our record does. The figures above count 2005 onwards only — what the archive holds, not a full-career total. This card is the full archive census (2005→); the statistics in the header aggregate from 2008 — the floor that guarantees every horse a complete captured career — so this card can legitimately show more wins than the header.
Kruguyrova (FR) — Prix Jacques d'Indy (Hurdle) Auteuil (FR) · Mar 2007 · Grade 3
£39,527
Le Chateau (FR) — Prix Jean Bart (Hurdle) (Listed Handicap) (5yo+) (Turf) Auteuil (FR) · Sep 2014 · Listed
£39,375
Nina Candela (FR) — Prix Spumate (Hurdle) (Handicap) (4-5yo Fillies & Mares) (Turf) Enghien (FR) · Mar 2013
£38,415

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Enrique (GB) 14% · 7–50
Progeny have won 10.7% of 2,601 runs since 2008 (289 horses). Weakest on Standard (AW) going: 4.9% from 370. Strongest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 15.8% from 462. Weakest over 1m – 1m1f (all codes): 6.6% from 347.
Evasive (GB) 12.9% · 4–31
Progeny have won 7.9% of 1,158 runs since 2008 (167 horses). Strongest on Soft going: 11.4% from 219.
Policy Maker (IRE) 10% · 2–20
Progeny have won 8.9% of 1,241 runs since 2008 (143 horses). Weakest on Good to Soft going: 4.6% from 197. Weakest over 2m5f – 3m (all codes): 4.8% from 125.
Kingsalsa (USA) 0% · 0–18
Progeny have won 9.3% of 2,989 runs since 2008 (284 horses). Strongest over 2m5f – 3m (all codes): 12.7% from 110.
Daliapour (IRE) 6.3% · 1–16
Progeny have won 10.4% of 617 runs since 2008 (64 horses).
Poplar Bluff (GB) 0% · 0–11
Progeny have won 0% of 35 runs since 2008 (9 horses).
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 15 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 530 · newest first

The latest 50 of 530 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 8 April 2005 to 24 October 2019.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is C Scandella's strike rate?
C Scandella has won 45 of 481 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 9.4% (as at 15 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does C Scandella do best at?
Longchamp (FR) by strike rate: 4 wins from 32 runners (12.5%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
Who rides most for C Scandella?
Ervan Chazelle, with 159 runners since 2008 — 33% of the total. That pairing has won 16 (10.1%).
What is C Scandella's Fair A/E?
1.01, from 429 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 15 October 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).