Skip to content
Trainer profile

Mario Hofer

78 runners in the last 5 seasons · 29 individual horses
As at 20 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner 346 days ago 100% of runners on the flat
from 1 Jan 2022
2–78
Wins / Runs
2.6%
Strike rate
n=78
10 (13%)
Placed
0.53
n=78 · 0.45 incl. margin
−63.30
£1 level stake
n=78 at SP · −81.2%
£70,827
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
0%
KTB at a glance Claiming riders: 3%

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 2.6% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
0%−2.6
n=18 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −18.00
New recruits · first run for the yard
0%−2.6
n=3 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −3.00
Debutants · first career start
0%−2.6
n=18 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −18.00
First-time headgear · true-first definition
0%−2.6
n=15 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −15.00
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
0%−2.6
n=4 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −4.00
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
3%+0.4
n=33 · A/E 0.71 · £1 −30.00
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
0%−2.6
n=5 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −5.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 2.6% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
With a new jockey booking 0% vs 2.6% · n=50
At Chantilly (FR) 0% vs 2.6% · n=30
Over 1m – 1m1f 0% vs 2.6% · n=30
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Standard (AW) 44 1 2.3% −41.00
Good to Soft 16 1 6.3% −4.30
Soft 12 0 0% −12.00
Good 5 0 0% −5.00
Heavy 1 0 0% −1.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Chantilly (FR) 30 0 0% −30.00
Deauville (FR) 27 1 3.7% −24.00
Longchamp (FR) 13 1 7.7% −1.30
Saint-Cloud (FR) 5 0 0% −5.00
Clairefontaine (FR) 2 0 0% −2.00
Cagnes-Sur-Mer (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 1 5 0 0% −5.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
2nd–3rd fav 4 1 25% 1.26 −1.00
4th–6th fav 18 0 0% 0.00 −18.00
7th+ in betting 56 1 1.8% 0.61 −44.30
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Gamgoom (GB)from Harry Dunlop 9 2 5 4 Oct 23
Asian Pearl (FR)then Henk Grewe 6 0 1 6 Apr 23
Bashking (IRE) 5 0 0 20 Jan 23
Tag (FR)from M Pimbonnet · then M Boutin 5 0 0 23 Jun 22
No Day Never (IRE)from Jamie Osborne · then Stijn Derycke 4 0 1 27 Mar 25
Alparslan (FR)then Jean-Pierre Carvalho 4 0 1 28 Feb 25
Venice (FR)then S Cerulis 4 0 1 1 Apr 23
Serido (GER) 4 0 0 16 Jun 22
Heartbeat (FR)then S Cerulis 4 0 1 10 Apr 22
Zavaro (GER)from Henk Grewe 3 0 0 30 Dec 23
Aljadeed (GB)then Yasmin Almenrader 3 0 0 6 Feb 23
All 29 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 29 horses listed, 5 arrived from another yard in our archive; 24 had their first archived run for this yard.

12 have since run for another yard, most often for Mme Stefanie Koyuncu (3) and S Cerulis (2); 17 have no later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

When the yard fires

strike by month, 5 seasons
JFMAMJJASOND
11000250·00000
A flat yard: the season runs Mar–Oct. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
RiderRWSR£1
Frau Stefanie Koyuncu 23 0 0% −23.00
Gerald Mosse 5 0 0% −5.00
Delphine Santiago 5 1 20% −2.00
Hugo Besnier 5 0 0% −5.00
Ismail Koyuncu 5 0 0% −5.00
Bauyrzhan Murzabayev 3 0 0% −3.00
Tolga Koyuncu 3 0 0% −3.00
Mickael Barzalona 3 1 33.3% +8.70
Cristian Demuro 3 0 0% −3.00
Theo Bachelot 3 0 0% −3.00
Eddy Hardouin 2 0 0% −2.00
Alexis Pouchin 2 0 0% −2.00
Muted rows are under 30 rides.

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2005→
129
Archived wins
16
Pattern / graded wins
£3.58m
Prize money
2013
Best season · 18 wins
In our archive from its very first year (2005), so this career almost certainly began earlier than our record does. The figures above count 2005 onwards only — what the archive holds, not a full-career total. This card is the full archive census (2005→); the statistics in the header aggregate from 2008 — the floor that guarantees every horse a complete captured career — so this card can legitimately show more wins than the header.
Pastorius (GER) — Prix Ganay (4yo+) (Turf) Longchamp (FR) · Apr 2013 · Group 1
£139,366
Smooth Operator (GER) — Criterium de Maisons-Laffitte Maisons-Laffitte (FR) · Nov 2008 · Group 2
£79,632
Flashing Numbers (USA) — Prix Eugene Adam (Straight Course) Maisons-Laffitte (FR) · Jul 2006 · Group 2
£78,621

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Exceed And Excel (AUS) 22.2% · 2–9
Progeny have won 11.9% of 16,025 runs since 2008 (1,161 horses). Strongest on Firm going: 20.7% from 198. Weakest on Soft going: 7.9% from 1,194.
Toronado (IRE) 0% · 0–6
Progeny have won 10.6% of 3,848 runs since 2008 (416 horses). Weakest on Heavy going: 6.9% from 189. Strongest at trips under 6f (all codes): 15.5% from 142.
Equiano (FR) 0% · 0–5
Progeny have won 9.1% of 7,538 runs since 2008 (549 horses).
Progeny have won 5.9% of 1,171 runs since 2008 (132 horses). Weakest on Good going: 2.4% from 124.
Kendargent (FR) 0% · 0–5
Progeny have won 9.6% of 5,213 runs since 2008 (579 horses). Weakest over 2m1f – 2m4f (all codes): 5.9% from 253.
Air Force Blue (USA) 0% · 0–4
Progeny have won 7.6% of 314 runs since 2008 (26 horses). Weakest on Standard (AW) going: 3.6% from 111.
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 20 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 1,273 · newest first

The latest 50 of 1,273 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 13 January 2005 to 8 November 2025.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is Mario Hofer's strike rate?
Mario Hofer has won 2 of 78 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 2.6% (as at 20 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does Mario Hofer do best at?
Chantilly (FR) by strike rate: 0 wins from 30 runners (0%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
What is Mario Hofer's Fair A/E?
0.53, from 78 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 20 October 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).