M Delzangles
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 180 runners a season, almost all on the flat, winning with 10% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 0.93). The yard is in form now — 2 winners in the last fortnight, above its own baseline.
It is weakest at Deauville (AW) (3.7% over 135 runners) — the widest gap in the record. Debutants struggle at 6.5% (n=139, Fair A/E 0.84). The market has consistently overbet a horse in first-time headgear: 7.1% strike, Fair A/E 0.80 and −21.80 to a £1 stake over 113 runners — those runners underperform what the price implies. Right now the yard is firing: 2 winners from 15 runners in the last 14 days (13.3%, 3.6pts above the 9.7% baseline). Gerald Mosse rides 26% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (8.9%, A/E 0.81). The record reads poorly over 6f – 7f — 5.3% over 132 runners, 4.4pts below the baseline. The market has consistently overbet the yard over 1m5f – 2m: Fair A/E 0.52 across 56 runners (5.4% strike, −31.30 to a £1 stake) — runners there underperform what the price implies. 68 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Prix Du Haras De Fresnay-Le-Buffard - Jacques Le Marois at Deauville (FR) (Aug 2010, £303,398). The stable star of the record: Rock Blanc (FR) — 7 wins from 34 runs for the yard.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 9.7% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 9.7% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerGoing
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
In formWhen the yard fires
strike by month, 5 seasonsJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 3,386 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 3,386 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 24 March 2005 to 20 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is M Delzangles's strike rate?
- M Delzangles has won 85 of 875 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 9.7% (as at 21 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does M Delzangles do best at?
- Chantilly by strike rate: 28 wins from 254 runners (11%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for M Delzangles?
- Gerald Mosse, with 224 runners since 2022 — 26% of the total. That pairing has won 20 (8.9%).
- Is M Delzangles in form?
- In the last 14 days: 15 runners, 2 winners, a strike rate of 13.3%. That is above the baseline of 9.7% since 2022.
- What is M Delzangles's Fair A/E?
- 0.93, from 872 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.