Phillip Enright
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Rides around 480 times a season, almost all over hurdles and fences, winning on 6% of them — level with the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 0.98). Riding last-time-out winners the record reads 17% (168 rides). The rider is in form now — 3 winners in the last fortnight, above their own baseline.
The record is strongest at Wexford (12.3%, n=130), Cork (11.8%, n=170) and Roscommon (12.7%, n=55) — all clear of the rider's 6.4% baseline. Rides on last-time-out winners have been a positive signal at 16.7% (n=168, Fair A/E 1.28). The market has consistently overbet in Group and Graded company the record: 3.6% strike, Fair A/E 0.68 and −71.50 to a £1 stake over 166 rides — those runners underperform what the price implies. Right now the rider is firing: 3 winners from 22 rides in the last 14 days (13.6%, 7.2pts above the 6.4% baseline). Oliver McKiernan supplies 17% of the rides and matches the rider's average almost exactly (8%, A/E 1.10) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. 32 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the rider has landed: the Pierse Hurdle at Leopardstown (Jan 2007, £78,650). The standout partner of the record: Westerner Point (IRE) — 11 wins from 33 rides together. Seasonally, the rider fires Jul–Aug.
Riding patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 6.4% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 6.4% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. First rides are the first captured pairing of horse and rider; last-time-out winners are horses whose previous captured run was a win; claiming rides are runs where the rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Jumping record
completion over obstacles · same window as headerHorses ridden
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
In formBy month
strike by month, 5 seasonsRiding for
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→Sires of the horses ridden
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 7,939 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 7,939 archived rides, newest first. The full record runs from 13 January 2005 to 18 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is Phillip Enright's strike rate?
- Phillip Enright has won 153 of 2,378 rides since 2022, a strike rate of 6.4% (as at 19 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Phillip Enright do best at?
- Wexford by strike rate: 16 wins from 130 rides (12.3%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most rides on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Which yard does Phillip Enright ride most for?
- Oliver McKiernan, with 399 rides since 2022 — 17% of the total. That pairing has won 32 (8%).
- Is Phillip Enright in form?
- In the last 14 days: 22 rides, 3 winners, a strike rate of 13.6%. That is above the baseline of 6.4% since 2022.
- What is Phillip Enright's Fair A/E?
- 0.98, from 2,377 rides with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.