Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
KTB Yard Profile
Sends out around 30 runners a season, almost all on the flat, winning with 9% of them — beating the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 1.17). With a claiming rider up the record reads 11% (62 runs).
Deterministic profile computed from 125 archived runs (last 5 seasons) · updated 15 Oct 2026
KTB at a glanceClaiming riders: 11.3%
The read
The yard also reads well in Class 5 (14%, n=57) and off a 15-30-day break (12.5%, n=48). The record reads poorly over 1m2f – 1m4f — 2.6% over 38 runners, 6.2pts below the baseline. One Group or Graded win sits in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Ripon Bell-ringer Handicap at Ripon (Jul 2018, £15,563). The stable star of the record: The Armed Man (GB) — 10 wins from 61 runs for the yard.
Written from the figures on this page — every claim carries its sample. Descriptive, not a tip.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 8.8% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
4.8%−4.0
n=21 · A/E 1.02 · £1 +2.00
Debutants · first career start
11.1%+2.3
n=9 · A/E 6.82 · £1 +42.00
First-time headgear · true-first definition
0%−8.8
n=3 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −3.00
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
0%−8.8
n=3 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −3.00
When favourite
12.5%
n=8 · A/E 0.46 · £1 −5.75
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
11.3%+2.5
n=62 · A/E 1.47 · £1 +92.25
Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 8.8% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baseline
Over 1m2f – 1m4f2.6% vs 8.8% · n=38
In Class 514% vs 8.8% · n=57
Off a 15-30-day break12.5% vs 8.8% · n=48
With Paula Muir11.9% vs 8.8% · n=42
With claiming riders up11.3% vs 8.8% · n=62
On Standard (AW) going6.5% vs 8.8% · n=62
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.
Record by conditions
same window as header
Race type
TypeRWSR£1
Flat120119.2%+161.50
Hurdle300%−3.00
NH Flat200%−2.00
Going
GoingRWSR£1
Standard (AW)6246.5%+62.00
Good2428.3%+29.25
Good to Soft1715.9%−11.50
Good to Firm11327.3%+64.75
Soft10110%+13.00
Heavy100%−1.00
Courses
CourseRWSR£1
Newcastle (AW)3937.7%+80.00
Southwell (AW)2015%−15.00
Ripon10110%+41.00
Pontefract800%−8.00
Doncaster8112.5%+15.00
Redcar7114.3%−4.75
Thirsk600%−6.00
Catterick6116.7%−1.00
Carlisle6116.7%+61.00
Wetherby2150%+1.75
Beverley2150%+3.50
York200%−2.00
Sedgefield200%−2.00
Wolverhampton (AW)200%−2.00
Southwell100%−1.00
Class
ClassRWSR£1
Class 557814%+198.75
Class 64636.5%−20.25
Class 41800%−18.00
Class 3400%−4.00
Market position
In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite9111.1%0.41−6.75
2nd–3rd fav14428.6%1.69+5.25
4th–6th fav4512.2%0.31+6.00
7th+ in betting5758.8%3.52+152.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.
Distance
DistanceRWSR£1
1m2f – 1m4f3812.6%−15.00
6f – 7f35411.4%+74.25
1m – 1m1f35411.4%+43.50
Under 6f9222.2%+61.75
1m5f – 2m500%−5.00
2m1f – 2m4f300%−3.00
By season
By seasonRWSR£1
20226469.4%+68.75
20236158.2%+87.75
Handicaps
HandicapsRWSR£1
Handicaps9588.4%+82.25
Field size
Field sizeRWSR£1
8-10 runners5559.1%+62.50
11-13 runners37410.8%+72.25
5-7 runners19210.5%+35.75
14-16 runners1200%−12.00
17+ runners200%−2.00
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
All 15 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next
Of the 15 horses listed, 1 arrived from another yard in our archive; 14 had their first archived run for this yard.
5 have since run for another yard; 10 have no later run for another yard in our archive.
Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.
When the yard fires
strike by month, 5 seasons
JFMAMJJASOND
8220251080613000
A flat yard: the season runs Mar–Oct. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".
Career highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→
89
Archived wins
1
Pattern / graded wins
£626k
Prize money
2018
Best season · 8 wins
In our archive from its very first year (2005), so this career almost certainly began earlier than our record does. The figures above count 2005 onwards only — what the archive holds, not a full-career total. This card is the full archive census (2005→); the statistics in the header aggregate from 2008 — the floor that guarantees every horse a complete captured career — so this card can legitimately show more wins than the header.
Progeny have won 7.4% of 1,074 runs since 2008 (104 horses). Strongest on Good to Firm going: 10.9% from 201. Weakest on Soft going: 3.9% from 103. Strongest over 1m2f – 1m4f (all codes): 11.4% from 123. Weakest over 1m – 1m1f (all codes): 3.8% from 158.
Progeny have won 8.1% of 1,749 runs since 2008 (123 horses). Strongest at trips under 6f (all codes): 11.7% from 779. Weakest over 1m – 1m1f (all codes): 3.9% from 152.
Progeny have won 9.4% of 7,588 runs since 2008 (492 horses). Strongest on Heavy going: 12.7% from 557. Strongest over 2m5f – 3m (all codes): 12.8% from 109.
Divine Prophet (AUS)11.1% · 1–9
Progeny have won 9.6% of 293 runs since 2008 (20 horses).
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 15 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.
The record
latest 50 of 1,377 · newest first
The latest 50 of 1,377 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 15 January 2005 to 28 September 2023.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
What is Chris Fairhurst's strike rate?
Chris Fairhurst has won 11 of 125 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 8.8% (as at 15 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does Chris Fairhurst do best at?
Newcastle (AW) by strike rate: 3 wins from 39 runners (7.7%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
What is Chris Fairhurst's Fair A/E?
1.17, from 124 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Chris Fairhurst·SR 8.8%·A/E 1.17
KTB
Cookies on Kickthebookies
We use essential cookies to run the site and remember your betslip. No advertising or tracking cookies, ever. By continuing to use this site, you agree. Cookie policy