Mrs Jane Williams
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 130 runners a season, almost all over hurdles and fences, winning with 14% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 0.93). Debutants are a strength: 16% on first career starts (38 runs).
The record is strongest at Exeter (21.1%, n=76), Hereford (22.6%, n=31) and Warwick (22.2%, n=36) — all clear of the yard's 13.5% baseline. In Group and Graded company the record reads poorly at 5.4% (n=37, Fair A/E 0.86). The market has consistently overbet horses returning fresh after 61+ days: 10.3% strike, Fair A/E 0.72 and −83.56 to a £1 stake over 155 runners — those runners underperform what the price implies. David Noonan rides 48% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (13.9%, A/E 1.00) — the market has that partnership priced right. The yard also reads well on Heavy going (25.5%, n=55). The record reads poorly in Class 1 — 4% over 50 runners, 9.5pts below the baseline. 4 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Ladbrokes Adonis Juvenile Hurdle at Kempton (Feb 2026, £45,774). The stable star of the record: Saint Segal (FR) — 8 wins from 32 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires Nov–Feb.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 13.5% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 13.5% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Jumping record
completion over obstacles · same window as headerHorses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Small sampleWhen the yard fires
strike by month, 5 seasonsJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2011→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 889 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 889 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 5 April 2011 to 17 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is Mrs Jane Williams's strike rate?
- Mrs Jane Williams has won 85 of 628 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 13.5% (as at 20 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Mrs Jane Williams do best at?
- Hereford by strike rate: 7 wins from 31 runners (22.6%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Mrs Jane Williams?
- David Noonan, with 302 runners since 2022 — 48% of the total. That pairing has won 42 (13.9%).
- Is Mrs Jane Williams in form?
- Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 12 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
- What is Mrs Jane Williams's Fair A/E?
- 0.93, from 626 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.