Jamie Snowden
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 270 runners a season, almost all over hurdles and fences, winning with 21% of them — beating the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 1.10). The yard is in form now — 5 winners in the last fortnight, above its own baseline.
The record is strongest at Huntingdon (34.4%, n=61), clear of the yard's 21.3% baseline. It is weakest at Cheltenham (8.3% over 48 runners) — the widest gap in the record. A horse having headgear put back on after a bare run has been a poor signal at 5.7% (n=35, Fair A/E 0.49). The market has consistently overbet in Group and Graded company the record: 10.1% strike, Fair A/E 0.80 and −28.00 to a £1 stake over 109 runners — those runners underperform what the price implies. Right now the yard is firing: 5 winners from 15 runners in the last 14 days (33.3%, 12pts above the 21.3% baseline). Gavin Sheehan rides 70% of the entries and edges the yard's average (24.3% vs 21.3%, A/E 1.15) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The yard also reads well on Good to Firm going (39.1%, n=46). The record reads poorly in Class 1 — 10.2% over 147 runners, 11.1pts below the baseline. 17 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Coral Gold Cup Handicap Chase at Newbury (Dec 2023, £142,375). The stable star of the record: Chapmanshype (IRE) — 8 wins from 26 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires Oct–Nov.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 21.3% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 21.3% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Jumping record
completion over obstacles · same window as headerHorses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
In formWhen the yard fires
strike by month, 5 seasonsJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2008→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 3,607 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 3,607 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 12 September 2008 to 22 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is Jamie Snowden's strike rate?
- Jamie Snowden has won 284 of 1,332 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 21.3% (as at 24 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Jamie Snowden do best at?
- Huntingdon by strike rate: 21 wins from 61 runners (34.4%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Jamie Snowden?
- Gavin Sheehan, with 927 runners since 2022 — 70% of the total. That pairing has won 225 (24.3%).
- Is Jamie Snowden in form?
- In the last 14 days: 15 runners, 5 winners, a strike rate of 33.3%. That is above the baseline of 21.3% since 2022.
- What is Jamie Snowden's Fair A/E?
- 1.10, from 1,329 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.