Michael & David Easterby
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 520 runners a season, almost all on the flat, winning with 9% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 0.93). Horses in first-time headgear strike at 11% (102 runs, true-first definition).
The record is strongest at Ayr (14.5%, n=117), clear of the yard's 9.3% baseline. Debutants struggle at 4.3% (n=164, Fair A/E 1.06). A horse in first-time headgear are the standout value angle: 10.8% strikes only just above baseline, but Fair A/E 1.30 and +3.33 to a £1 stake over 102 runners — a record the market has persistently underpriced. The market has consistently overbet runners with a claiming rider up: 6.9% strike, Fair A/E 0.81 and −130.15 to a £1 stake over 347 runners — those runners underperform what the price implies. Joanna Mason rides 38% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (10.4%, A/E 0.97) — the market has that partnership priced right. The yard also reads well over 2m1f – 2m4f (14.9%, n=87). One Group or Graded win sits in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Sky Bet Constantine Handicap Stakes at York (Aug 2026, £69,579). The stable star of the record: Eligible (IRE) — 11 wins from 58 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires Jun–Jul.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 9.3% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 9.3% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
SteadyWhen the yard fires
strike by month, 5 seasonsJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2021→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 2,937 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 2,937 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 8 June 2021 to 19 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is Michael & David Easterby's strike rate?
- Michael & David Easterby has won 241 of 2,605 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 9.3% (as at 20 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Michael & David Easterby do best at?
- Carlisle by strike rate: 11 wins from 74 runners (14.9%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Michael & David Easterby?
- Joanna Mason, with 977 runners since 2022 — 38% of the total. That pairing has won 102 (10.4%).
- Is Michael & David Easterby in form?
- In the last 14 days: 26 runners, 3 winners, a strike rate of 11.5%. That is in line with the baseline of 9.3% since 2022.
- What is Michael & David Easterby's Fair A/E?
- 0.93, from 2,588 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.