John & Thady Gosden
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 570 runners a season, almost all on the flat, winning with 22% of them — beating the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 1.06). With a claiming rider up the record reads 24% (129 runs). The yard is quiet just now — 4 winners in the last fortnight, below its own baseline.
The record is strongest at Newcastle (AW) (36.2%, n=105) and Chelmsford City (AW) (34%, n=94) — all clear of the yard's 21.8% baseline. It is weakest at Ascot (12.6% over 269 runners) — the widest gap in the record. A horse in first-time headgear has been a poor signal at 14.6% (n=226, Fair A/E 0.90). Right now the yard is in a quiet spell: 4 from 27 runners in the last 14 days (14.8%, 7pts below the 21.8% baseline). Robert Havlin rides 30% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (21.2%, A/E 1.02) — the market has that partnership priced right. The yard also reads well in Class 5 (29.9%, n=626). The record reads poorly on Soft going — 13.9% over 244 runners, 7.9pts below the baseline. 148 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Juddmonte International Stakes at York (Aug 2025, £748,218). The stable star of the record: Trawlerman (IRE) — 11 wins from 19 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires Nov–Dec.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 21.8% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 21.8% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerGoing
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Quiet spellWhen the yard fires
strike by month, 5 seasonsJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2021→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 3,501 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 3,501 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 26 March 2021 to 23 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is John & Thady Gosden's strike rate?
- John & Thady Gosden has won 619 of 2,841 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 21.8% (as at 24 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does John & Thady Gosden do best at?
- Newcastle (AW) by strike rate: 38 wins from 105 runners (36.2%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for John & Thady Gosden?
- Robert Havlin, with 863 runners since 2022 — 30% of the total. That pairing has won 183 (21.2%).
- Is John & Thady Gosden in form?
- In the last 14 days: 27 runners, 4 winners, a strike rate of 14.8%. That is below the baseline of 21.8% since 2022.
- What is John & Thady Gosden's Fair A/E?
- 1.06, from 2,825 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.