Patrick Rodford
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sent out around 40 runners a season, almost all over hurdles and fences, winning with 15% of them — beating the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 1.88).
Horses returning fresh after 61+ days have been a poor signal at 8.8% (n=34, Fair A/E 1.49). Runners with a claiming rider up are the standout value angle: 15.4% strikes only just above baseline, but Fair A/E 1.99 and +93.85 to a £1 stake over 130 runners — a record the market has persistently underpriced. Keiran Burke rode 85% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (16%, A/E 2.01) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The yard also read well on Good to Soft going (21.9%, n=32) and over 2m1f – 2m4f (20.9%, n=43). The market has also underrated the yard on Good going: Fair A/E 1.50 across 53 runners (11.3% strike, +51.50 to a £1 stake). The record read poorly over 1m5f – 2m — 11.1% over 36 runners, 3.9pts below the baseline. The stable star of the record was Holmwood Legend (GB) — 6 wins from 19 runs for the yard.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 15% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 15% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Jumping record
completion over obstacles · same window as headerHorses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 324 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 324 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 3 January 2005 to 15 June 2011.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is Patrick Rodford's strike rate?
- Patrick Rodford has won 22 of 147 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 15% (as at 1 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Patrick Rodford do best at?
- Newton Abbot by strike rate: 5 wins from 33 runners (15.2%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Patrick Rodford?
- Keiran Burke, with 125 runners since 2008 — 85% of the total. That pairing has won 20 (16%).
- What is Patrick Rodford's Fair A/E?
- 1.88, from 147 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.